4000W eBikes (2026): All 9 We Sell, Matched by Use

9 bikes at 4,000 W · $1,269 to $3,750 · 189 listings read · 27 states · 3 machine shapes

Quick Answer — A 4,000W e-bike is an off-road machine: private land, OHV areas, motocross tracks and routes designated for motor vehicles. Federal law defines a bicycle at 750 watts, so a 4,000W machine is registered and ridden as a motor vehicle rather than as a bike. We sell nine, $1,269 to $3,750.

Where you can ride decides this purchase before any specification does. Settle that first, then pick the machine: the nine split into three quite different shapes, and the wattage they share tells you almost nothing about which one suits you. Before you commit, it is worth knowing who near you will service it — the verified e-bike store directory covers 727 storefronts across seven states. All nine are below, each with the riding it is for.

How we verified this guide

We opened all 189 active e-bikes on our own shelf and read what each listing publishes for its motor. On 155 a rating came back; on 34 our listing publishes no specification block we could read, and those are recorded as unread rather than counted as under 4,000 W. The nine here were found that way rather than chosen.

Every decisive figure was then checked against the manufacturer's own product page on 6 September 2026, and where our listing and the maker disagreed we followed the maker.

Two figures on this page come from the maker rather than from our own listing, and both are named in the limitations at the foot. The federal definitions are quoted from the Government Publishing Office's own text rather than a paraphrase of it.

The questions this guide answers were harvested from search suggestions, the headings of the pages currently ranking, AI-search answers and a rider forum — 518 observations, 77 of them questions. We publish no search-volume figures, because no current export was available to measure them.

In this guide

• Rated 4,000W and peak 4,000W are two different machines
• How fast is a 4,000W e-bike?
• Is a 4,000W e-bike street legal in the US?
• Where you can actually ride one: the three federal land systems
• Your state is the other half of the answer
• What a 4000W ebike actually is: three machines, one number
• Terrain and climate: the geography that decides which shape you want
• Which use each shape is actually built for
• Rider type: weight, height and experience
• Which 4,000W bike fits which rider
• How these three picks were chosen
• Every 4,000W bike we sell, in the maker's own words
• The nine, one by one
• What riding one on the road actually risks
• What changed, and what is about to
• 4,000W against 2,000W and 3,000W: what actually changes
• How far does a 4,000W e-bike go?
• What owners worry about at this power
• The pre-purchase checklist: settle these before you order
• Delivery day: the first hour with a 4,000W machine
• After it arrives: the before-you-ride playbook
• What one of these actually costs to run

Rated 4,000W and peak 4,000W are two different machines

Four thousand watts is the number that brought you here, and on our shelf it arrives on nine machines that share almost nothing else. Buy on the number alone and you can pay $3,750 for a machine that does the same job as one at $1,269. This guide reads the word beside the number, then the shape, then the ground you can legally ride.

A rated or continuous figure is the power a motor holds without overheating. A peak figure is what it produces briefly, on a launch or a steep pitch, and peak commonly runs 50% to 100% above rated right across the segment. Both are useful and they answer different questions: peak tells you about the first three seconds, rated tells you about the long climb.

Match the word to your riding. Every bike below is quoted in its maker's own wording, so you can read the figure that matters to you rather than a number we have flattened.

Our e-bike motor guide works through the rated-and-peak distinction across every power class we sell.

The practical consequence is heat. Sustained draw at this level is what makes a controller cut power to protect itself, and a hard climb can pull several times the current of flat ground. A rated figure tells you what the machine will hold on a long ascent; a peak figure tells you what it will do for the first three seconds.

How fast is a 4,000W e-bike?

Between about 28 mph and 55 mph on the makers' own figures, and the spread has nothing to do with the wattage they share. Do not read 4,000W as a speed. Voltage, gearing and where the motor sits decide pace, and the highest figure here comes from a single 72-volt mid-drive rather than from any of the dual-motor machines.

The two ends of the range are far apart. Eunorau publishes 55 mph for the R1, a 72-volt mid-drive, while Eahora publishes 28+ mph (46 mph) for the Romeo Pro II, a 52-volt machine with two hub motors, printing both figures in one row without explaining the bracket.

Same headline wattage, and a spread wide enough that the number tells you nothing about pace.

What separates them is voltage, gearing and how the power reaches the ground. The R1 runs 72 volts through a mid-motor and the chain, which is the arrangement that produces both the highest published speed here and the highest published torque. A hub motor at 52 volts is doing a different job.

Treat any speed figure, ours included, as the manufacturer's claim on their conditions. None of the figures on this page are our own test results, and every one of them is attributed.

Is a 4,000W e-bike street legal in the US?

No. Federal law defines a low-speed electric bicycle at less than 750 watts with fully operable pedals, and a 4,000W machine misses on power by more than five times. A class sticker or a speed limiter does not change that. Twenty-four of the twenty-seven states we have read adopt the same ceiling.

Federal law defines a low-speed electric bicycle at 15 U.S.C. § 2085(b) as:

"a two- or three-wheeled vehicle with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts (1 h.p.), whose maximum speed on a paved level surface, when powered solely by such a motor while ridden by an operator who weighs 170 pounds, is less than 20 mph."

Four elements — wheels, pedals, power and motor-only speed — and a 4,000W machine misses on power by a factor of more than five. Two of the nine here fail an earlier test than power: they have no pedals at all, which puts them outside the definition before wattage is even reached.

One precision worth having, because paraphrase destroys it. The statute says "less than 750 watts", so a motor of exactly 750 watts is outside the federal definition. The National Park Service and BLM regulations say "not more than 750 watts", so exactly 750 watts is inside theirs. Two federal texts, two boundary words, opposite answers at the line. Nothing at 4,000 watts turns on it, but it tells you how precisely these definitions are written and how carelessly they are usually repeated.

A machine outside that definition is not thereby illegal. It is simply not a bicycle, so it is governed by whatever your state calls a motor-driven cycle, moped or motorcycle — categories that carry registration, licensing and equipment requirements a bicycle does not. That is a different purchase, and it is the reason the geography section below matters more than any specification.

Where you can actually ride one: the three federal land systems

If you are buying a 4,000W machine to ride off road, this is the section that decides whether the purchase works. The National Park Service and the BLM each define an electric bicycle at 750 watts; the Forest Service defines one nowhere at all. All three land you in the same place, by three different routes.

The Park Service definition reads "an electric motor of not more than 750 watts", and its regulations expressly carve an electric bicycle out of "motor vehicle". A 4,000W machine does not reach that carve-out, so inside a park it is a motor vehicle and goes where motor vehicles go.

The BLM rule is the one most often described backwards. Its exclusion of e-bikes from the off-road vehicle definition is conditional, and the conditions are joined by "and" — all three must hold, including an authorized officer having expressly decided that e-bikes should be treated as non-motorized bicycles. A machine over 750 watts never reaches those conditions in the first place.

The Forest Service text is the shortest answer of the three. Its definitions section carves out only rail vehicles and mobility devices for mobility-impaired persons. There is no e-bike exception in it at all, so a 4,000W machine is a motor vehicle and belongs on the routes the Motor Vehicle Use Map designates for one.

The practical version. BLM's Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area in southeast California is the clearest example of the kind of place these machines are for: a designated off-highway vehicle area where BLM requires a safety flag on a whip mast. Singletrack signed non-motorized is not open to this machine, and neither is wilderness.

The pedal-less shape exists for ground like this and is wasted anywhere else. Geometry, travel and clearance are what you are paying for.

Your state is the other half of the answer

Your state decides what a 4,000W machine becomes once it leaves the bicycle definition, and in twenty-four of the twenty-seven we have read that is a motor-driven cycle, moped or motorcycle with registration and licensing attached. Oregon tests by class and speed with no wattage cap at all. Find your state's row below, then read its page before you buy.

Most states answer it the same way. Of the twenty-seven with a published e-bike statute on our shelf of state pages, twenty-four define an electric bicycle at 750 watts or below.

A 4,000W machine clears that ceiling by more than five times, so in those twenty-five it falls out of the bicycle category and into whatever the state's vehicle code calls a motor-driven cycle, moped or motorcycle. Those categories bring registration, licensing, insurance and equipment rules a bicycle never triggers.

Three of the twenty-seven do not read that way. Oregon's definition carries no wattage cap at all: ORS 801.258 tests an electric bicycle by class and speed, so wattage is not the question there, and our Oregon page works through what is. For Minnesota and New Jersey our own record carries no wattage figure in the definition, which is a gap in our record rather than a finding about either statute — the Minnesota and New Jersey pages carry the current text, and those are the ones to read before you buy in either state.

Each row below links to our page for that state, where the statute is quoted rather than summarized. Frameworks and citations are as we recorded them on 19 August 2026.

The states that do something different

The ceiling is uniform. The machinery around it is not, and four differences are worth knowing before you buy.

New Jersey rewrote its categories outright. P.L.2025 c.285 replaced the Class 1/2/3 system with three statutory categories of its own, signed 19 January 2026, with a grace period that ended 19 July 2026. If you learned New Jersey's rules before that, you learned the old ones. Our New Jersey page works through the new categories.

North Carolina is mid-transition. It is single-tier today and moves to a three-class system on 1 December 2026 under S.L. 2026-46 § 19. A machine's treatment there can change between the day you order and the day it arrives. Our North Carolina page carries both states of the law.

Minnesota runs four categories. Minn. Stat. § 169.011 adds a "multiple mode" category alongside Class 1, 2 and 3, which is a distinction most national guides flatten away. See our Minnesota page.

Pennsylvania never adopted classes at all. It regulates a "pedalcycle with electric assist" as a single tier, so there is no class label to argue about — only whether the machine is inside the definition or outside it. Our Pennsylvania page has the detail. Washington tightened its own definition through ESSB 6110, effective 11 June 2026, and New York caps Class 3 at 25 mph and confines it to New York City.

New Jersey is worth a second look for a different reason: its third category, "electric motorized bicycle", is defined by a motor above 750 W together with assist above 28 mph, so a high-power machine has a named place in the statute rather than falling into a general motor-vehicle class. A national summary flattens that kind of detail, which is why the state page matters more than any national summary, this one included.

What a 4000W ebike actually is: three machines, one number

One number, three machines. A 4,000W e-bike is a pedal-less dirt bike, a moped-style bike with pedals, or a fat-tire dual-motor bicycle, and the shape decides where it can be ridden, who it fits and what it costs to run. The wattage they share decides almost nothing, which is the trap this whole page exists to name.

1. The pedal-less dirt bike. A motocross layout with footpegs where cranks would be, a mid-motor driving a chain, and long-travel suspension. It is not a bicycle in any sense — legal or physical — and it is bought for tracks, private land and OHV areas. Our best electric dirt bikes guide covers this shape on its own.

2. The moped-style bike with pedals. Fat tires, a long saddle, hub motors and a very large battery. It pedals, and the pedals are there to get you home and to keep it the shape of a bicycle rather than to make the miles. It is built for distance and load.

3. The fat-tire dual-motor bicycle. A recognisable bicycle with a motor in each wheel, and the most affordable route to this power. It looks like a bike-lane machine and it is not one, so settle your riding ground first: OHV areas, private land and designated motorized routes.

The three shapes, head to head

The bottom row is the one that surprises people: the cheapest shape is also the one most likely to be mistaken for a legal e-bike, and the most expensive is the one whose legal position is clearest.

Terrain and climate: the geography that decides which shape you want

Where you ride is really two questions. The legal one the sections above answer; the physical one decides which shape you want. Soft ground rewards float and two driven wheels, sustained climbs reward a continuous rating and gearing, heat removes headroom, and distance is decided by watt-hours. Match the ground to the shape before you match the price.

Sand and snow. Soft ground rewards float and traction over outright power. Wide tires at low pressure spread the load and keep the machine on top of the surface instead of digging into it, and two driven wheels help more than a bigger single motor when the front end wants to wash out. The moped-style and fat-tire shapes are built for this; a moto tire on a dirt bike is cut for hard ground and bites rather than floats.

Wide tires at low pressure spread the load and let the machine float instead of digging in. This is the shape you want when the surface will not hold you.

Mountains and sustained climbs. This is where a rating beats a peak. A long ascent is minutes of continuous draw rather than seconds, and a motor quoted only at its brief maximum has no published answer for what it holds at the top of a fire road. Gearing matters as much: a mid-drive puts its torque through the chain and the gears, which is why the mid-drive on this page publishes the highest single-motor torque figure of the nine.

A sustained climb is minutes of continuous draw. It is the condition a peak figure has nothing to say about. One tier up, that same rated-versus-peak test leaves only two machines standing, and our 5000W e-bike guide names both.

Heat. Desert and southern summer riding compounds the same problem from the other direction. Sustained high current makes heat, and ambient heat removes the machine's ability to shed it. Plan long climbs in the cool part of the day and treat a peak figure as unavailable in August.

Heat works from both directions: the motor makes it and the air will not take it away. Ride the long climbs early.

Distance and rural riding. Watt-hours are what count here. A 3,640 Wh pack is what turns a heavy machine into one you can take somewhere and get home from; a 1,200 Wh pack at this power is a short ride. If your nearest legal riding is a two-hour drive and a full day once you are there, buy the battery.

Watt-hours are the number that decides how far you get home from. At this power the packs on our shelf run from 1,200 to 3,640 Wh.

Wet and mud. Hydraulic brakes and real tire clearance, and an ingress rating if the maker publishes one. Eunorau publishes IP65 for the R1, which rates both dust and water. Eahora publishes IPX6 for the Romeo Pro II's motors, and the X means dust was not rated — a useful figure for rain, not the one you want for a dune day.

Wet ground is where brakes and clearance earn their money, and where a published ingress rating stops being a footnote.

Which use each shape is actually built for

Each shape is built for a different job. The dirt bike is for tracks, dunes and moto practice; the moped-style machine is for land work, distance and carrying load; the fat-tire bicycle is for sand, snow and loose ground on a budget. None of the three is built for bike lanes, and the section ends with where those riders should look.

Dunes, tracks and moto practice. A pedal-less dirt bike, every time. It is the only one of the three shapes with the geometry, the suspension travel and the ground clearance for jumps and berms, and the only one whose weight is where a moto rider expects it. Sand riding wants a safety flag on a whip mast wherever you ride sand, required or not.

Land work and property patrol. A ranch, a large property, a hunting lease. Here the moped-style machine wins on range and load, and the silence is a genuine advantage over a combustion quad. Our Eunorau FAT-HS review covers the lower-power version of the same job if 4,000 watts is more than you need.

Land work is the quiet argument for this power: the load, the range and no engine noise across a paddock at dawn.

Distance on motorized routes. Forest roads, OHV networks, desert two-track. The limit is the battery and the seat. The motor is not what stops you. This is the one use where the biggest pack on the page is worth its weight.

Sand, snow and loose ground on a budget. The fat-tire dual-motor bicycle, which is six of the nine machines here and the whole $1,269 to $1,999 tier. Two driven wheels keep it moving where a single hub spins, wide tires at low pressure float where a moto tire digs, and the pedals get you home. It is the shape most often mistaken for a bike-lane machine, and it is not one.

Two-up riding. Only the moped-style shape offers it, and only where the load rating supports it. A 500 lb maximum load is what makes carrying a passenger a published capability rather than a hope.

Two-up is a load-rating question before it is a comfort question, and a legal question before either.

What none of them is for. Commuting, bike lanes, multi-use paths and the school run. Those are 750-watt jobs and our 750W guide covers them properly.

Rider type: weight, height and experience

Three fit questions decide this more than any spec: how much you weigh with gear on, how tall you are, and how much powered riding you have done. The published load rating sorts heavy riders first, seat height sorts short riders, and experience should push a first-time buyer toward the compact frame and the lower published speed.

Heavy riders. Look at the published maximum load before anything else, then at brakes. The gap is wide: Eunorau publishes 220 lb for the R1 and Eahora publishes 500 lb for the Romeo Pro II. A 240 lb rider in gear is over the R1's published figure and well inside the Romeo's, and that single number moves the recommendation more than any other on this page. Our e-bikes for heavier adults guide covers the same question inside the legal definition.

Tall and short riders. Standover and seat height decide comfort more than frame size does at this weight. Eunorau publishes a 30.7-inch seat height for the compact R1 frame and describes it as suiting shorter and younger riders; the full-size frame runs larger wheels and a taller stance. Eahora publishes a 5'6" to 6'4" rider range for the Romeo Pro II. Our tall riders guide covers fit across the wider shelf.

Riders new to this much power. Two honest cautions. A machine that reaches 45 mph does it faster than a rider's judgement adapts, and 130 to 161 lb of machine behaves nothing like a bicycle when it gets away from you. If this is your first powered two-wheeler, the compact frame, the lower published speed and a large open area to learn in are all worth more than the extra torque.

Younger riders. The categories a 4,000W machine falls into carry motor-vehicle minimum ages rather than bicycle ones, and those vary by state. Ridstar's own page states its machines are not for sale to persons under 18. Read your state page before buying one for a teenager, and our e-bikes for kids and teens guide covers what is appropriate at each age.

Which 4,000W bike fits which rider

Three machines carry this page's picks, one for each of the shapes above. One of them comes in two frame sizes at one price, so there are four product pages and three decisions. All are verified at the manufacturer and buyable today.

If you ride tracks, private land or OHV areas: the Eunorau R1

Eunorau R1 — $3,750. Eunorau publishes a 72V 4,000W mid-motor with 8,000W peak, 330 N·m of peak torque, 55 mph, a 72V 35Ah battery, 130 lb, four-piston hydraulic brakes on 203mm discs, 203mm of fork travel, IP65, and a 220 lb load capacity.

That last figure is the one to read first if you are a heavier rider. At 220 lb published, a rider in gear can reach it, and the Romeo Pro II's 500 lb rating is the answer if you do.

This is the dirt bike of the group, and the only mid-drive at this power on our shelf. Torque reaches the rear wheel through the chain and the gearing, which is the arrangement that lets a machine multiply torque on a climb instead of asking the motor for it directly.

It has no pedals — footpegs where a bicycle has cranks, as Eunorau's own photographs show — so the legality question is settled before wattage is reached: this is a private-land and OHV machine. Our full R1 review goes through the rest of the specification.

Two frame sizes at one price. The R1 Compact is the same motor, battery and price on smaller wheels — 80/100-17 front and 80/100-16 rear against the full-size 70/100-19 — with a 30.7-inch seat height Eunorau publishes and describes as suiting shorter and younger riders. Motor, battery, peak torque, weight and price are identical across the two frames — the wheels and the standover are the whole difference. Choose the compact for standover and handling, the full size for reach and stability at speed.

Where it does not belong. Anywhere you have no legal ground to ride, and anywhere a bicycle is what you actually wanted. If that is you, our electric bike buying guide is the better starting point, and our best electric mountain bikes guide covers trail-legal machines.

Footpegs where a bicycle has cranks, and a chain from a motor mounted low in the frame. Nothing on this machine turns under your feet, which is the detail that settles its legal status.

Add the R1 to your cart · free shipping in the lower 48.

If you want distance, load and a machine you can pedal: the Eahora Romeo Pro II

Eahora Romeo Pro II — $2,599. Eahora publishes 2 × 2,000 W in its specification row, with 2 × 120 N·m, a 3,640 Wh battery on 52V 70Ah, 104–200 miles with pedal assist, a 500 lb maximum load, 160.94 lb with the battery in, hydraulic disc brakes with motor cutoff, 26" × 4.0" tires and air suspension at both ends.

The battery is the headline. At 3,640 watt-hours nothing else here comes close, and that is what makes the Romeo Pro II a distance machine rather than a sprint one. The 500 lb load rating is the other reason to choose it: it carries a heavy rider, a passenger or gear without running out of frame.

It has pedals and a rider height range of 5'6" to 6'4". None of that makes it a legal e-bike at 4,000 watts, and the sections above still apply. What it does mean is that this is the one you can pedal home.

If you want to jump, buy the other one. At 161 lb with 100mm of front travel the Romeo Pro II is built for ground rather than air, so a rider who wants berms and lips wants the Eunorau R1 above. If you want this shape inside the legal definition instead, our best electric mopeds guide covers the machines that stay there.

A motor in each wheel, a long bench saddle, and a full crank set. The battery box between the seat and the cranks is where the 3,640 watt-hours live.

Add the Romeo Pro II to your cart · free shipping in the lower 48.

If you want two driven wheels for the least money: the Ridstar Q30 Pro

Ridstar Q30 Pro — $1,269. Ridstar publishes "dual front and rear motors, each with a power of 2000W" for a combined 4,000 W, two 52V 20Ah batteries totalling 40Ah, 28+ mph, up to 180 miles in pedal assist, hydraulic dual brakes, 20" x 4.0" tires, suspension at both ends and a 7-speed drivetrain.

The battery is why it is here. Two 52-volt 20Ah packs come to roughly 2,080 watt-hours, which at $1,269 is the most stored energy per dollar of anything on this page — and the second pack is on the bike as standard rather than as an upsell. Pair that with a motor in each wheel and you have the combination that actually matters on sand, snow and loose gravel, where a single driven wheel spins and a front motor pulls you straight.

It has pedals and a 7-speed drivetrain, so it pedals home. Everything in the legal sections above still applies at 4,000 W: this is an off-road machine.

Where it does not belong. Ridstar publishes no torque, payload or weight figure for this model, so if your decision turns on a load rating the Eahora Romeo Pro II publishes 500 lb and is the one to read. And if you want to jump it, the Eunorau R1 is the machine with the travel.

Ridstar's own page states its machines are not for sale to persons under 18.

The maker's record. The Q30 Pro appears in no regulator's notice as of September 11, 2026. The same maker's Q20 family carries two 2026 US CPSC stop-use warnings. The March 19 notice, citing 11 reports of fire: "The e-bikes' batteries and wires can ignite, posing a fire hazard to consumers." The June 25 notice, citing 32 front-wheel detachments and 31 injuries: "The front wheel can detach without warning, posing a crash hazard to consumers."

A warning is not a recall; per the March notice the manufacturer "has refused to agree to an acceptable recall." On June 19, 2025 the UK Office for Product Safety and Standards rated three Ridstar models' chargers "a serious risk of fire" and recorded "The import has been rejected at the border." Two 2026 complaints, Oregon, against Amazon and Florida, against Walmart, allege a Ridstar front wheel came off; both are undecided. Our Ridstar brand profile covers each model.

A motor in each wheel, a pack in the frame and a second on the rack, and a coil-over shock behind the seat tube. On sand this is the layout that keeps moving when a single driven wheel digs in.

Add the Q30 Pro to your cart · free shipping in the lower 48.

The rider grid

The last two rows are the honest ones. If your riding is on public roads, a 4,000W machine is the wrong purchase however good the specification looks, and the money is better spent on a bike you can legally use.

How these three picks were chosen

Nine machines, three picks. Two things decide that, and the first is not merit: our recommendation module is limited to the brands we stand behind and stock deeply, which is a shorter list than our shelf. The census above is complete regardless, and every machine on it is one we sell and ship.

Within that list, the logic runs like this, because the reasoning is more useful to you than the conclusion.

Step one: start from the rider. At this power the specifications converge — everything here has hydraulic brakes, suspension at both ends and a large battery. What separates them is what they are shaped for, and a rider who wants to jump and a rider who wants to cover eighty miles are not choosing between the same machines at all. So the first cut is by riding case, and the two that come up most at 4,000 watts are track and OHV ground, and distance with load.

Step two: the spec that decides that case. For track and OHV riding it is torque delivery and suspension travel, which is why the mid-drive with 203mm of fork wins that column. For distance and load it is watt-hours and the published load rating, which is why 3,640 Wh and 500 lb win the second. For soft ground on a budget it is driven wheels and stored energy per dollar, which is why two hub motors and roughly 2,080 Wh win the third. No pick is chosen on the wattage they share with the other six.

Step three: verify the deciding spec at the manufacturer. Every figure above was read from the maker's own material rather than from our listing, and where the two disagreed the maker won. That step changed two figures on this page before it was published.

Step four: check it is actually buyable. Both picks are in stock, both prices match the maker's own published price to the dollar, and both cart links were tested.

Step five: read the machine's own photographs against its specification. This matters more than it sounds. A photograph of a bike whose defining feature is a motor in each wheel should show a motor in each wheel, and the first image made for this page did not — it went back and was redone.

Every 4,000W bike we sell, in the maker's own words

Nine machines on our shelf publish 4,000 watts, and each is quoted below exactly as its manufacturer states it, with its published top speed and its shape beside it. Rated and peak describe different machines, and one maker prints the same system both ways on the same page, so the wording is reproduced rather than normalised.

Every line above was read from the manufacturer's own material on 6 September 2026 and is deposited with this page. Where a maker prints the same system two ways — Eahora's specification row reads "2 × 2,000 W" while its summary copy calls the system "peak 4000W" — the specification row is what appears here.

The measured point of this table. The same headline number spans $1,269 to $3,750 on one shelf — a 2.96× price range at 4,000 watts. Whatever you are paying for at the top of that range, it is not the wattage. It is voltage, torque, battery size, brakes and suspension, and those are the specifications worth comparing.

Six of the nine drive both wheels; three drive one. Every one of the nine is buyable today.

The nine, one by one

Every machine our shelf publishes at 4,000 watts, in descending price, each with the figure that decides it and the riding it is for. Three carry a pick and six do not; the six are here because this page covers everything we sell at this power. Specifications are each manufacturer's own, retrieved 6 September 2026.

Eunorau R1 — $3,750. The only mid-drive of the nine, and the fastest thing here at a published 55 mph. Also the only one with no pedals, and rated for a 220 lb load. For: tracks, dunes and open private land, for a rider who wants a dirt bike and has ground to ride it on.

Eunorau R1 Compact — $3,750. The same motor, battery, torque, weight and price on 17-inch front and 16-inch rear wheels, with a published 30.7-inch seat height. For: the same riding, for a shorter or younger rider who needs the standover.

Eahora Romeo Pro II — $2,599. Two 2,000 W hub motors, 3,640 Wh, a 500 lb load rating and pedals. For: distance on motorized routes, heavy riders, and carrying gear or a passenger where that is permitted.

Freesky Warrior Pro M-530 — $1,999. Freesky publishes "2 × 2000W Peak Motors, Torque 120N·M *2" on a 48V 30Ah Samsung or LG pack, 40 mph, with a sprung saddle and suspension at both ends. For: loose, steep, short ground where two driven wheels and a comfortable saddle matter more than range.

Freesky Cheetah MT-380 — $1,849. "Dual Motors – 4,000W Peak Power (2×2,000W)" with 240 N·m across the pair and a 48V 60Ah battery, the largest pack of the five Freesky machines, at 40 mph. For: long days on motorized trails where you want two driven wheels and do not want to think about charging.

Freesky Swift Horse Ultra X-6E — $1,599. The only machine of the nine built around a named motor: "4000W Peak BAFANG Motor with 150 N·M" on a 48V 35Ah LG pack, 38 mph, one driven wheel. For: a rider who would rather have a component they can look up than a second motor.

Freesky Eurostar Turbo M-410 — $1,299. "2 × 2000W Peak Motors, Torque 105N·M 2" on a 48V 25Ah pack, 34 mph, two driven wheels. For:* the cheapest route to two-wheel drive, on mixed ground and shorter rides.

Freesky Ranger Air M-540 — $1,299. The same published motor line and pack as the Eurostar Turbo, in a different frame with an air shock. For: the same riding, for a rider who wants adjustable rear suspension rather than a coil.

Ridstar Q30 Pro — $1,269. Ridstar publishes "dual front and rear motors, each with a power of 2000W" and, on the same page, two 52V 20Ah batteries totalling 40Ah, which is the largest battery-to-price ratio of the nine. For: sand, snow and soft ground on a budget, where float and two driven wheels do the work.

Every machine on this page is one we stock and ship. Browse the wider shelf in all our fat-tire e-bikes or every e-bike we sell, or the Eahora range if the moped-style shape is what you are after.

What riding one on the road actually risks

On public roads the exposure is a vehicle-code one rather than an e-bike one. A 4,000W machine is not a bicycle, so riding it without the registration, plate, license endorsement and insurance your state requires of a motor-driven cycle is an offence against those rules. Penalties are set by state code, and none is published here that was not read in a statute.

On public roads the exposure is a vehicle-code one. Riding without whatever registration, plate, license endorsement and insurance your state requires of a motor-driven cycle is an offence against those requirements rather than against any e-bike rule.

The fine, the ticket, and in some states impoundment of the vehicle, are set by your state's own code. We do not publish figures we have not read in a statute, and your state page is where those provisions live.

On federal land the exposure is different and more specific. Inside a national park, 36 CFR § 4.30(i)(2) makes e-bike use in an undesignated location a prohibited act outright, and a machine over 750 watts never reaches the designation question because it is not an electric bicycle there at all. On BLM and Forest Service ground the machine is a motor vehicle and is bound by the area's OHV designation or its Motor Vehicle Use Map.

The insurance point is the one people miss. A policy written for a bicycle does not cover a vehicle the state classifies as a motorcycle, and a claim is where that distinction surfaces.

None of this is an argument against the machines. It is an argument for buying one to use where it belongs, which is what the rest of this guide is about.

What changed, and what is about to

Four dated changes matter to a 4,000W buyer, and one of them has not happened yet. None moved the 750-watt figure; each changed what a machine above it becomes in one particular place. If you are buying in New Jersey, Washington or North Carolina this year, the date on the change matters as much as anything on the specification sheet.

2 November 2020 — the federal land definitions landed. The National Park Service rule (85 FR 69188) and the BLM rule (85 FR 69223) published the same day, each defining an electric bicycle at not more than 750 watts. The ceiling on federal ground became explicit that day.

19 January 2026 — New Jersey replaced its class system. P.L.2025 c.285 substituted three statutory categories for Class 1/2/3, with the grace period ending 19 July 2026.

11 June 2026 — Washington tightened its definition through ESSB 6110.

1 December 2026 — North Carolina moves to three classes under S.L. 2026-46 § 19. If you are buying in North Carolina this autumn, the rules that apply to your machine change during the ownership period.

None of these moved the 750-watt figure. What they changed is what a machine above it becomes.

4,000W against 2,000W and 3,000W: what actually changes

Not the legal answer. A 2,000W machine is as far outside the federal definition as a 4,000W one, so stepping down a tier does not buy you a bike lane. Most people shop this comparison hoping it will, and it is the one thing the comparison cannot deliver.

What does change is heat, weight and battery. More sustained power means more current for the same speed, which means a bigger pack to hold usable range and more mass to carry it. It also means the components that fail first — controller, spokes, brakes — are working harder.

Buy the extra power for torque under load: a heavy rider, a passenger, a long steep climb, soft ground. Those are the conditions where a higher rating is doing real work. For flat ground at moderate speed it mostly buys acceleration you will use briefly and pay for in range.

If the legal question is what actually matters to you, our 750W guide covers the machines that stay inside the definition.

How far does a 4,000W e-bike go?

Between 75 and 200 published miles across the four machines that publish a figure, and every one assumes a gentle speed. A published range is not a promise. It is a best case measured under restraint, and using 4,000 watts as 4,000 watts will not produce it, so buy the battery and then plan on less than the box says.

Eahora publishes 104 to 200 miles with pedal assist for the Romeo Pro II and 70 to 76 miles without it, on 3,640 watt-hours. Eunorau publishes 75 miles for the R1 on 72V 35Ah, and states the condition attached to it: under 16 mph. That condition is the useful part. A published range is measured at a gentle speed, and 4,000 watts used as 4,000 watts will not produce it.

Independent testing of the Romeo Pro II reported roughly 70 to 120 real-world miles, against a published best case of 200.

A published range assumes restraint, right across the category. Plan around that rather than being surprised by it.

What owners worry about at this power

Riders discussing 4,000W builds raise the same three things, and none of them is speed: motor and drivetrain wear, whether the machine is still a bicycle, and whether a motorcycle would serve them better. Each is a question worth putting to your own purchase before you make it, and the rest of this section quotes the riders who asked them.

The first is wear. One rider put it as "incredible motor wear and tear. Really limited range", and another asked for "assurances from the manufacturer that the bike is made for turbo mode" — which is the rated-versus-peak question arriving from the other direction.

The second is whether the machine is still a bicycle. "If the supplied power compared to the human input is so high...then it is no longer a bicycle" is a rider reaching, unprompted, the same conclusion the statute reaches.

The third is whether it is the right vehicle at all: "if you need more than 45mph speed you should just get a motorcycle." Put that challenge to your own purchase before you spend. A 4,000W machine makes sense when you want a bicycle-shaped vehicle for ground a motorcycle is too heavy for, or when you want the silence. If neither applies, the challenge lands.

The pre-purchase checklist: settle these before you order

1. Settle where you will ride before you choose a machine. Private land, OHV areas and motorized routes are the answer for all nine of these. Confirm the specific unit before you travel.
2. Read your state's definition. The state law hub links every page we have published, with the statute quoted.
3. Check whether it has pedals. It changes the legal analysis before power does, and it changes how you get home.
4. Compare the battery before the wattage. Watt-hours decide range; the motor figure does not.
5. Compare rated against peak. Two bikes advertising 4,000W can be a rated machine and a peak machine, and the maker's own wording tells you which.
6. Budget for gear. At these speeds a helmet rated for a bicycle is the wrong helmet.

Delivery day: the first hour with a 4,000W machine

These arrive in a crate, roughly 90% assembled, and at 130 to 161 lb the unboxing is a two-person job. An hour of care on day one prevents most of what goes wrong later: photograph the crate, torque four fasteners, charge to full, check the brakes standing still, and ride it slowly somewhere empty before you ride it anywhere else.

Get help with the lift. A crated 130 to 161 lb machine is not a solo carry down a driveway. Have a second person and a flat route to the garage before the truck arrives.

Photograph the crate before you open it. If there is freight damage, the picture is the claim. This costs thirty seconds and it is the only evidence that exists.

Torque the four things that matter. Stem, handlebar clamp, axle nuts and brake calipers. Every one of them ships loosened for packing, and at this weight and speed a loose axle is not a small problem. If you do not own a torque wrench, this is the purchase that justifies one.

Charge to full before the first ride, and read the display. A pack that arrives at storage charge will not give you the range the specification promises, and a first ride that ends with a walk home is almost always this.

Check the brakes before you check the throttle. Squeeze both levers hard while stationary and look at the pad-to-rotor gap. Hydraulic systems can ship with air in the line after freight, and the first place you want to discover that is standing still.

Then find an empty space and ride it slowly. Not the trail, not the dunes. A large flat area where you can learn what the throttle does before anything else is happening. These machines deliver their torque instantly and the first application surprises almost everyone.

Register the warranty and keep the serial. Eahora publishes a battery cycle life of at least 1,200 charges to 80% capacity for the Romeo Pro II; a warranty claim on any machine starts with a serial number and a purchase date, and both are easier to record now than to find later.

If anything is missing or damaged, that is what our support address is for, and a photograph attached to the first email resolves it faster than a description.

After it arrives: the before-you-ride playbook

The checklist above is for the decision; this one is for the week the machine arrives, and it assumes you have already bought. Six things in the order they matter, from the vehicle class your state assigns to the insurer who needs to know what you now own. None of it is legal advice.

1. Know which vehicle class your state puts the machine in. Not "it's an e-bike" but the actual category in your own vehicle code. Your state page has it, and the answer decides everything below.

2. Have your riding ground picked before delivery. Private land with the owner's permission, a named OHV area, or a track. "I'll find somewhere" is how a $2,599 machine ends up in a garage.

3. Carry proof of permission if you ride private land. A text message from the landowner is enough and it ends the conversation before it starts.

4. Check the specific unit rather than the agency. BLM, Forest Service and Park Service each delegate to the local office, the Motor Vehicle Use Map or the superintendent. A rule that holds in one district does not hold in the next one.

5. Wear motorcycle gear. A bicycle helmet is certified for bicycle speeds and this is not one. Gloves, boots and eye protection are the rest of it.

6. Tell your insurer what the machine is. Do it before the first ride rather than after an incident.

What one of these actually costs to run

Electricity is negligible; tires, brake pads and getting the machine to your riding ground are where the money goes. A 130 to 161 lb machine at 40 mph wears pads and rubber far faster than a bicycle, and most buyers need a motorcycle-rated carrier or a trailer, which belongs in the purchase price before the sticker does.

Charging. A 3,640 Wh pack is roughly 3.6 kilowatt-hours from empty to full. At typical US residential rates that is small change per charge — the cost of running a machine like this is not the electricity.

Tires and brakes. This is where the money goes. A 130 to 161 lb machine at 40 mph eats brake pads and tires far faster than a bicycle does, and the parts are motorcycle-sized rather than bicycle-sized. Budget for pads as a consumable rather than a repair.

Transport. Every machine on this page is too heavy to lift onto a roof rack alone, and most are too heavy for a standard bicycle hitch rack. A motorcycle-rated carrier or a trailer is part of the purchase if your riding ground is not out your back gate. At 130 lb the Eunorau is the lightest of the three shapes here and still twice a heavy e-bike.

Battery replacement. Eahora publishes a cycle life of at least 1,200 charges to 80% of capacity for the Romeo Pro II. On a pack that size, that is a long horizon, and it is a number worth asking for on any machine that does not publish one.

What you are not paying for. No registration or insurance if you ride private land or an OHV area under a permit rather than on the road, and no fuel. The running cost of an electric machine used off road is genuinely low; the capital cost of getting it there is what people underestimate.

Frequently asked questions

How fast is a 4,000W electric bike?

Between about 28 mph and 55 mph on the makers' own figures. Eunorau publishes 55 mph for the R1; Eahora prints "28+ Mph(46mph)" for the Romeo Pro II and Ridstar prints 28+ mph for the Q30 Pro. Voltage, gearing and motor placement set the speed, and the shared wattage does not.

Is a 4,000W e-bike street legal?

No. Federal law caps a low-speed electric bicycle at less than 750 watts with fully operable pedals, so a 4,000W machine is outside the definition and is treated as a motor vehicle under your state's rules.

Do you need a license for a 4,000W electric bike?

Usually yes, because the machine is not a bicycle. Whichever category your state places it in — moped, motor-driven cycle or motorcycle — carries its own licensing, registration and equipment requirements. Check your state's own statute before you buy.

Can you ride a 4,000W e-bike in bike lanes?

No. Bike lanes are for bicycles, and a machine over 750 watts is not one. Plan your route around OHV areas, private land, and roads where your state allows the vehicle class it places the machine in.

Where can you legally ride a 4,000W ebike?

Private land with permission, OHV areas, motocross tracks, and routes designated for motor vehicles on Forest Service and BLM land. Not on trails signed non-motorized.

Is 4,000W too powerful for an e-bike?

For a bicycle, yes — it is more than five times the federal ceiling. For an off-road machine it is a reasonable amount of power, and the question becomes whether it is rated or peak.

Does higher wattage always mean higher speed?

No. The highest published speed on this page comes from a single-motor 72-volt mid-drive, and the lowest from dual-motor machines with the same headline wattage. Voltage and gearing decide speed.

How long does a 4,000W ebike battery last?

Four of the nine publish a range: 75 miles for the R1 and the same for the R1 Compact, 104 to 200 with pedal assist for the Romeo Pro II, and up to 180 for the Q30 Pro. Published ranges assume gentle speeds; the Eunorau figure states its condition as under 16 mph.

What is the difference between rated and peak power?

Rated is what the motor can hold continuously; peak is what it can produce briefly. Peak figures are commonly 50% to 100% higher. Four of the nine machines here publish 4,000W as a rating and five publish it as a peak.

Is a 4,000W dual motor better than a single motor?

For traction on loose ground, yes — two driven wheels help in sand, snow and gravel. For top speed the single 72-volt mid-drive on this page publishes the highest figure of the nine, and on sustained climbing no machine here has been independently tested, ours included. Six of the nine are dual-motor.

What is the best 4,000W electric bike?

It depends which of the three shapes you need. For tracks and OHV riding, the Eunorau R1. For distance, load capacity and the ability to pedal, the Eahora Romeo Pro II.

What is the difference between the Eunorau R1 and the R1 Compact?

Wheels and standover, and nothing else. Both publish a 72V 4,000W mid-motor with 8,000W peak, 330 N·m, 55 mph, a 72V 35Ah battery and 130 lb, at the same $3,750. The Compact runs 17-inch front and 16-inch rear wheels with a published 30.7-inch seat height; the full-size runs 19-inch front.

Can a 4,000W e-bike carry a passenger?

Only the moped-style shape has the saddle and the load rating for it, and only where two-up riding is permitted where you ride. Eahora publishes a 500 lb maximum load for the Romeo Pro II, which is what makes it a published capability rather than a hope.

Do 4,000W e-bikes need insurance?

If your state classifies the machine as a motor vehicle and you ride it on the road, the answer is whatever that class requires. A bicycle policy will not cover it. On private land the question is your own liability rather than a statutory one.

What size battery does a 4,000W ebike need?

Bigger than you would guess, because sustained power draws current fast. The packs on this page run from 1,200 Wh to 3,640 Wh, and the larger ones are what make a full day's riding possible rather than a short one.

Is a 4,000W electric bike worth it?

Only if you have somewhere legal to ride it. Nothing else in the decision outranks that. If your riding is on roads and bike lanes, the money buys more usable bike at 750 watts.

The bottom line

Nine machines on our shelf publish 4,000 watts, spanning $1,269 to $3,750 — a 2.96× price range behind one number, which tells you the number is not what you are buying. Three of the nine carry our picks, one for each machine shape, and the paragraphs below say which one is yours.

If you ride tracks, private land or OHV areas and you want the machine that climbs hardest, the Eunorau R1 at $3,750 is the mid-drive, and the Compact frame puts the same bike under shorter riders. If you want distance, a 500 lb load rating and pedals, the Eahora Romeo Pro II at $2,599 carries the biggest battery here.

If your budget is nearer $1,300 than $2,600, the Ridstar Q30 Pro at $1,269 puts a motor in each wheel and roughly 2,080 watt-hours under you, which is the most stored energy per dollar here.

And if your riding is on public roads, the machine you want sits at 750 watts, where the whole three-class system is written to let you ride. We sell those too — our 750W guide places every one of them against the rider it fits, and the full shelf is one click from here.

Decide slowly if you want to. Pre-purchase questions go to sales@redtailebikes.com and are answered within a business day. +1 213-444-4020 reaches a person, and every voicemail is returned. Shop Pay instalments are at checkout on every machine here, and shipping in the lower 48 is free. Nothing on this page needs deciding today.

Limitations

1. We publish no search-volume or difficulty figures on this page. No keyword export inside our 30-day freshness window was available, and an unavailable instrument is not a license to estimate.
2. Every performance figure is the manufacturer's claim rather than our test result. We have not independently measured a speed, a range or a torque figure on any machine here.
3. Our shelf census could not read a motor rating for 34 of the 189 active bikes, because those listings publish no specification block we could parse. Those are gaps in our own listings, not evidence about the bikes, and any of them could later prove to publish 4,000 watts.
4. Third-party range testing is cited for one machine only. The others have no independent testing we could retrieve.
5. State law is summarized here and quoted in full on the state pages. Where the two differ, the state page and the statute behind it govern.
6. Prices, stock and cart links are a snapshot of 6 September 2026 and change without notice.
7. Two figures here come from the manufacturer rather than from our own listing. Ridstar's page states two 52V 20Ah packs for the Q30 Pro where our listing states one, and Eahora prints the Romeo Pro II's top speed as "28+ Mph(46mph)" in a single row. We follow the maker in both cases and our listings are being brought into line.
8. This page carries three in-depth picks and a complete census of all nine. The picks are one per machine shape: track and OHV ground, distance with load, and soft ground on a budget. The census lists every 4,000 W machine on our shelf with its own published figures.
9. Ridstar publishes no torque, payload or weight figure for the Q30 Pro. Those rows are absent from our comparison for that machine rather than estimated.
10. We sell Ridstar, and three of its models named by the US CPSC are listed on our store. The Q20, Q20 Pro and Q20 Lite appear in CPSC's fire warning of March 19, 2026 and crash warning of June 25, 2026; each was buyable here on September 11, 2026. Both are warnings; neither carries a remedy program. The Q30 Pro is named in no notice; the UK report and the Oregon and Florida complaints name other models.

When this page expires. Re-verify if a manufacturer changes a published specification, if a state amends its e-bike definition, or if the federal 750-watt definition is amended.

Source register

This guide was last verified September 6, 2026 by Milad Ghobadibeygvand, BScN (Western University, 2014) for Redtail eBikes. Corrections: support@redtailebikes.com.

References

1. U.S. Government Publishing Office, United States Code, Title 15 § 2085(b), 2024 edition — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2024-title15/pdf/USCODE-2024-title15-chap47-sec2085.pdf (accessed 14 August 2026)
2. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36 § 1.4, 2024 edition — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title36-vol1/pdf/CFR-2024-title36-vol1-sec1-4.pdf (accessed 14 August 2026)
3. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36 § 4.30, 2024 edition — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title36-vol1/pdf/CFR-2024-title36-vol1-sec4-30.pdf (accessed 14 August 2026)
4. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 43 § 8340.0-5, 2024 edition — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title43-vol2/pdf/CFR-2024-title43-vol2-sec8340-0-5.pdf (accessed 14 August 2026)
5. U.S. Government Publishing Office, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36 § 212.1, 2024 edition — https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2024-title36-vol2/pdf/CFR-2024-title36-vol2-sec212-1.pdf (accessed 14 August 2026)
6. Bureau of Land Management, E-Bikes on BLM-Managed Public Lands — https://www.blm.gov/programs/recreation/e-bikes (accessed 6 September 2026)
7. National Park Service, E-Bikes — https://www.nps.gov/subjects/biking/e-bikes.htm (accessed 6 September 2026)
8. Eunorau, R1 72V4,000W Middle Motor Full Suspension Electric Dirt Bike — https://eunorau-ebike.com/products/r1 (accessed 6 September 2026)
9. Eunorau, R1-17 — https://eunorau-ebike.com/products/r1-17 (accessed 6 September 2026)
10. Eahora, Eahora Romeo Pro II 2026 — https://www.eahoraebike.com/products/eahora-romeo-pro-ii (accessed 6 September 2026)
11. Ridstar, Ridstar Q30Pro 4000W Fat Tire Ebike — https://ridstar.net/products/ridstar%C2%AE-q30pro-4000w-fat-tire-ebike-2 (accessed 6 September 2026)
12. Engwe, Rated Power vs Peak Power: E-Bike Motor Performance — https://us.engwe.com/blogs/news/rated-power-vs-peak-power (accessed 6 September 2026)
13. Best-bikes.net, eAhora Romeo Pro II 2025 E-Bike Review: Power and Range — https://www.best-bikes.net/eahora-romeo-pro-ii-2025-e-bike-review-power-range/ (accessed 6 September 2026)
14. Electric Bike Review forums, What would you do with 4000W power? — https://forums.electricbikereview.com/threads/what-would-you-do-with-4000w-power.33234/ (accessed 6 September 2026)
15. Redtail eBikes, All eBikes — the census denominator — https://redtailebikes.com/collections/all-ebikes (accessed 6 September 2026)
16. Bureau of Land Management, Imperial Sand Dunes Recreation Area — https://www.blm.gov/visit/imperial-sand-dunes (accessed 6 September 2026)
17. Freesky, Warrior Pro M-530 (product catalog) — https://www.freeskycycle.com/products/warrior-pro-m-530 (accessed 6 September 2026)
18. Redtail eBikes, Electric bike laws by state — https://redtailebikes.com/blogs/journal/electric-bike-laws (accessed 6 September 2026)
19. Redtail eBikes, Eunorau R1 Review (2026) — the no-pedals confirmation — https://redtailebikes.com/blogs/journal/eunorau-r1-review (accessed 28 August 2026)
20. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Warning 26-337: Ridstar Q20 and Q20 Pro e-bikes, fire hazard, March 19, 2026. https://www.cpsc.gov/Warnings/2026/CPSC-Warns-Consumers-to-Immediately-Stop-Using-Ridstar-E-Bikes-Due-to-Fire-Hazard-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death (accessed 11 September 2026)
21. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Warning 26-584: Ridstar Q20 and Q20 Lite e-bikes, crash hazard, June 25, 2026. https://www.cpsc.gov/Warnings/2026/CPSC-Warns-Consumers-to-Stop-Using-Ridstar-E-Bikes-Immediately-Due-to-Crash-Hazard-Risk-of-Serious-Injury-or-Death (accessed 11 September 2026)
22. UK Office for Product Safety and Standards, Product Safety Report 2506-0011: Ridstar E-Bikes Q20-Plus, Q20-Mini, E26 Pro and Chargers, June 19, 2025. https://www.gov.uk/product-safety-alerts-reports-recalls/product-safety-report-ridstar-e-bikes-and-chargers-2506-0011 (accessed 11 September 2026)
23. Cunanan v. Amazon.com Services LLC, No. 3:26-cv-00692, U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, complaint filed April 7, 2026, RECAP docket. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73159439/cunanan-v-amazoncom-services-llc/ (accessed 11 September 2026)
24. L.E. v. Walmart Inc., No. 9:26-cv-81045, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, filed July 30, 2026 in the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County and removed August 24, 2026, RECAP docket. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/74691512/le-v-walmart-inc/ (accessed 11 September 2026)