Eahora Romeo II Review 2026: 143 lb, 186 lb Left

52V · 2 × 1,250 W · 2 × 100 N·m · 3,120 Wh · 40 mph published · 330 lb rated · 143.3 lb · 34" fixed seat · $2,299 · verified September 2, 2026

Quick Answer — The Eahora Romeo II is a $2,299 dual-motor moped-style e-bike: 2 × 1,250 W, 3,120 Wh, a published 40 mph, and 143.3 lb. Its 330 lb load rating leaves 186.7 lb for rider and cargo once the bike is subtracted. The seat is a fixed 34 inches and cannot be adjusted.

Two things separate it from the rest of the Romeo family. Its range claim is the most conservative on our shelf — the arithmetic is below. And its charge-time line cannot be met by the charger in the box.

What's on this page

• Who the Romeo II is for
• How we verified this Eahora Romeo II review
• Eahora Romeo II specifications
• The range claim, and why it is the most careful one we sell
• The charge time the charger cannot hit
• 330 pounds rated, 186.7 left over
• One seat height, 34 inches
• The Mercer fit test
• 2,500 watts, 40 mph, and all 51 states
• What "unlocking" actually changes
• Is the Romeo II certified?
• Has it been recalled?
• Brakes, suspension and the parts you can check
• Where the page disagrees with itself
• What owners and testers report
• The warranty, and who files the claim
• Buying it from us
• The honest ledger
• Who should buy it
• Before you buy: the checklist
• Limitations of this review
• The source register
• References
• Frequently asked questions
• The bottom line

Who the Romeo II is for

Buy this bike if you are between about 5'8" and 5'10", you have somewhere to ride a 40 mph machine, and you want the longest honest range in the Romeo family for the least money. At $2,299 it is the cheapest dual-motor Romeo, and its numbers hold together better than the more expensive ones do.

Do not buy it if you are shorter than 5'7" or taller than 5'11", and do not buy it if you and your cargo together approach 190 lb. Both of those are decided by figures Eahora publishes itself, and both are worked through below.

Eahora's own photograph. Look at the rider's leg: the seat is a fixed 34 inches from the ground and there is no seatpost to drop.

How we verified this Eahora Romeo II review

Nobody here has ridden this bike, and we do not pretend otherwise. Everything below is read from a document, and every document is linked.

• The manufacturer's page was retrieved three ways on 2 September 2026 — the rendered product page, the .js endpoint and the .json record — and all three were archived.
• Every specification is quoted verbatim from Eahora's own block, including its spelling and spacing.
• The legality screen is statutory: the published wattage and top speed against the electric-bicycle definition in all 51 US jurisdictions, each row carrying its own citation.
• The safety check was validated before it was believed. Both CPSC routes were run against a brand known to carry open warnings first, and both found them, before the zero for this brand was accepted.
• Third-party findings are attributed to whoever made them, with the date they were published. We ran no test of our own.
• We sell this bike. Read the red flags as carefully as the green ones, and email corrections to support@redtailebikes.com — we publish them.

Written by Milad Ghobadibeygvand, BScN (Western University, 2014), Redtail eBikes. Verified 2 September 2026.

Eahora Romeo II specifications

Every row is Eahora's own published value, quoted from its specification block as read on 2 September 2026.

The range claim, and why it is the most careful one we sell

Eahora publishes four range figures for this bike: "108 - 120 miles with PAS, or 78 - 90 miles w/o PAS". The way to test any of them without a dynamometer is to divide the pack by the miles, which gives the energy consumption the claim assumes.

Our arithmetic on Eahora's numbers. Every bar sits above the shelf median, which is unusual.

This is the finding worth buying the bike for, and it runs the opposite way to most range stories. We ran the same division across every e-bike on our shelf on 1 September 2026. Of 189 active models, 87 publish both a base pack and a range that belongs to it; 29 publish a range for a different battery and were excluded instead of estimated; 73 publish neither. Across those 87, the median claim assumes 12.69 Wh per mile — and 80 of the 87 assume less than the Romeo II's 26.00. Its throttle-only figure of 40.00 Wh/mi is heavier than every single one of them; the census maximum is 38.40.

A heavier assumed consumption means a claim that expects the bike to use more energy per mile, which is what an honest number looks like on a 143 lb machine with two motors. The whole gap between the Romeo II's best and worst published figures is 1.54×. On the Juliet Pro II, from the same maker on the same page template, that gap is 3.7×.

None of that makes 120 miles a tested number. No published review of any Romeo build includes a full range test of the Romeo II. The closest measured figure in the record is BikeRide's note that "While testing the single-motor Romeo Pro, a 220lb reviewer gets 77.2 miles of riding range on pavement" — a different bike, on a smaller battery.

The charge time the charger cannot hit

Eahora publishes both halves of this arithmetic in the same block, and they do not meet.

The charger is a "58.8V 7A Quick charger". Volts multiplied by amps gives watts: 58.8 × 7 = 411.6 W at full output. The pack is 3,120 Wh. 3,120 ÷ 411.6 = 7.58 hours — and that is with no conversion losses, no heat, and no taper at the top of the charge, none of which any lithium pack avoids.

The published figure is "6-7.5H". The theoretical floor sits above the published ceiling by about five minutes, which means the real charge cannot land inside the stated window.

This is not our arithmetic against Eahora's word. BikeRide's own facts table for the Romeo family, compiled from every published review, lists the charge time as "7.5, 9 Hours" — reviewers timing it landed above the claim, in the place the division predicts.

Two practical notes. Plan an overnight charge, and treat 6 hours as the number for a pack that is not empty. Eahora's warranty also asks you to "Use only Eahora-approved parts and chargers", so the 58.8 V unit in the box is the one to keep using.

The electricity is cheap either way. A full charge is 3.12 kWh, which at the EIA's June 2026 US residential average of 18.34 cents per kilowatt-hour is 57 cents — about 0.48 cents a mile at the 120-mile figure.

330 pounds rated, 186.7 left over

Eahora publishes a 330 lb maximum load and a 143.3 lb bike. Subtract one from the other and 186.7 lb remains.

Whether that subtraction is the right one depends on a definition Eahora does not give. "Max load" can mean the load the bike carries — 330 lb of rider and gear on top of the machine — or the total the tires, frame and brakes are rated to hold, machine included. The page does not say which. The same ambiguity sits on the Eahora DL2000, which publishes the same 330 lb ceiling on a machine 21 lb heavier.

Read the conservative way, a 190 lb rider is already over the number before adding a backpack. A 190 lb rider is not a rare rider. It is worth an email before you order, and it is the kind of question we will put to Eahora for you.

For scale inside the same family: the Romeo Ultra II is rated to 500 lb and weighs 174.17 lb, which leaves 325.8 lb on the same reading. If the payload number is the one that decides your purchase, that is the bike to look at.

One seat height, 34 inches

This is the section to read before any of the performance ones, because it eliminates more buyers than anything else on the page.

Eahora publishes a seat height of 34 inches as a single value, not a range. The components block says why, in its own words: "No Seatpost for motorcycle-style seat." There is no post to raise or lower. What the bike ships at is what you ride.

A motorcycle-style saddle bolted across the frame. It is comfortable and it is not adjustable — the two facts are the same fact.

Eahora is more consistent here than on its other pages: both of its rider-height statements say 5'4" – 6'2", where its Juliet Pro II publishes three ranges that disagree. But one fixed saddle has to serve that whole 10-inch band, and the record says it does not.

• At the bottom. A rider at 5'4" typically has an inseam near 29 to 30 inches. A 34-inch saddle is four inches above that, and it cannot come down. The 24.4-inch standover means you can get on and off comfortably; sitting and pedalling is the different test.
• At the top. BikeRide's tester found the ceiling too: "A tester thinks riders over 5'10" won't be able to pedal comfortably despite the bikes being rated for up to 6'2" (Romeo II)."

Eahora's own drawing. Ⓒ is the seat height, and it carries one number where most geometry tables carry two.

Practically: this is a bike for riders around 5'8" to 5'10". If you are outside that, ask us for measurements in writing before you order, and look at the Juliet Pro II, which has a 32.6-to-40.5-inch adjustable saddle on a step-through frame.

The same fixed seat, from the drive side. There is no post between the saddle and the frame.

The Mercer fit test

The Mercers are our editorial cast: seven fixed people of known age and height that we hold every bike against, so "does it fit?" gets the same test every time. They are fit archetypes, never testers. Every verdict below reads a published number or an age rule, and none of them has ridden this bike.

The contrast that matters is Dana and Ruth. Two inches of height separate them on one fixed saddle, they shop from the same page, and one fixed saddle makes this bike right for one and wrong for the other. A bike with no seatpost does that: it turns a preference into a filter.

2,500 watts, 40 mph, and all 51 states

This is the section that decides where the bike can be ridden, so it is built from statutes on top of the federal definition, and every one is cited.

Eahora publishes 2 × 1,250 W — 2,500 W, the figure in its own page title — a 40 mph maximum, and a twist throttle. Those were screened against the electric-bicycle definition in all 51 US jurisdictions on 2 September 2026, in a table where every row carries its own statutory citation.

The federal reference point is 15 U.S.C. § 2085(b), which defines a low-speed electric bicycle as one with a motor of less than 750 watts and a top motor-powered speed under 20 mph on level ground with a 170-pound rider. That decides how the Consumer Product Safety Commission treats a machine; where you may ride it is decided by your state.

It is worth seeing the other side of that line to understand what this bike gives up. Our review of Eunorau's 20-inch children's e-bike covers a 250 W, 15.5 mph machine that clears all three limbs of the same definition with room to spare — and the legal simplicity that buys is most of its appeal.

The result: 0 QUALIFIES · 49 OUTSIDE DEFINITION · 2 NO STATUTORY DEFINITION.

The two are Alaska, which publishes no e-bike definition in AS 28.90.990(a)(20)-(22), and Kentucky, which publishes none in KRS 189.010.

Sitting outside a definition is not the same as being unusable. It means the machine is regulated as whatever else that state's code covers, and those codes differ: California, Texas and Florida each set a 750 W ceiling.

New York caps assisted speed at 25 mph, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts at 20, and Rhode Island writes its ceiling as 1,492 watts. That is why bikes like this are sold for private land and permitted trail, and why our state-by-state e-bike law guide exists.

This is a category fact before it is an Eahora fact. Every moped-style machine at this power meets the same 750 W ceiling and fails it. What separates makers is whether they publish figures you can check against a statute, and Eahora publishes both in its own page title.

What "unlocking" actually changes

"How to unlock eahora romeo 2" is one of the things people actually type — it came back in our own autocomplete harvest on 2 September 2026. So here is the honest answer, and it contains no instructions.

Eahora's speed line already publishes both numbers: "28+ Mph(40mph) for both pedal-assist and throttle". The 28 is what the display ships set to; the 40 is what the machine will do. Nothing about the hardware changes when the display setting does.

What changes is nothing legal. The bike's published nominal wattage is 2,500 W either way, and wattage alone puts it outside 45 of the 49 states that publish a definition — before speed is considered at all. A machine that sits outside a definition at 28 mph sits outside the same definition at 40.

BikeRide puts it more bluntly, and we quote instead of paraphrasing: "With top speed and power unlocked, none of the Romeo builds can be ridden legally on public roads or trails."

We publish no method, and the reason is not squeamishness: the number that decides where you can ride this bike is the wattage, and no display setting moves it. Read your state's row and buy the bike for the ground you actually have.

Is the Romeo II certified?

Eahora publishes nothing about certification for this model. Not on the product page. Not in the specification block. Not in the geometry block. No standard is named, no certificate number, no issuing body.

An empty page proves nothing on its own, so we went looking in four places before accepting the silence. The product page was only the first:

• Eahora's own site search returns 0 results for "UL 2849", 0 for "UL 2271" and 0 for "UN38.3". That same search box returns 57 results for "Juliet", which is how we know it was working when it returned nothing.
• eahoraebike.com/pages/certification returns HTTP 404. So does eahoraebike.com/pages/ul-certification.
• The strings "UL/CE", "UL 2849" and "UL 2271" appear nowhere in the rendered Romeo II page we deposited.
• The only certification sentence anywhere on the site is a single line in an FAQ post dated 12 April 2024: "Yes, all our batteries have passed UL certification, so you can use them safely without safety concerns."

UL 2849 covers the electrical drive system of an e-bike; UL 2271 covers the battery pack itself. They are separate certifications, granted separately, and "UL certification" with no standard named cannot be checked against either.

Now the part worth your attention. Asked about this bike on 2 September 2026, an AI answer reported that it has "full lighting, including turn signals, horn, and a solid safety certification approved by UL/CE standards." The lighting is published. The certification is not, in any form, anywhere.

This is a documentation gap, and neither inference it invites is available. It carries no implication about the pack in either direction. What it means is that the check is unavailable to you, and one document from Eahora — a standard and a certificate number — would make it available.

Has it been recalled?

No, and this is a checked absence and never a failed search.

• The CPSC's complete Product Safety Warning listing — all 359 rows, downloaded on 2 September 2026 — contains no row naming Eahora. The same file returns two rows for a brand carrying open 2026 warnings, so the file and the match were both working when they returned nothing.
• The CPSC recall API returns 0 records for Eahora. A control query on the same endpoint came back with 19 records, so it was awake.

Both routes ran a positive control in the same session — the warning listing returns rows for a brand carrying two open warnings — which is the only reason this paragraph is publishable. A brand can carry warnings and still return zero recalls — separate instruments — so both were run.

Recalls and warnings are issued continuously. Check cpsc.gov/Recalls yourself before buying any e-bike; this page reports the record as it stood on 2 September 2026.

Brakes, suspension and the parts you can check

The specification block names parts rather than describing them, which means you can look them up.

Brakes. "Hydraulic disc brakes with motor cutoff" on 4-piston calipers and 180 mm rotors. That is a smaller rotor than the 203 mm the Juliet Pro II carries, on a bike 5 lb lighter and 3 mph slower. BikeRide's summary records the practical result: "Experts testing the Romeo II are pleased with the stopping power."

Four pistons on a 180 mm rotor. Eahora publishes both figures, which most listings at this price do not.

Suspension. An "Adjustable hydraulic suspension, 80mm travel" fork and an "Air suspension with damping, 50mm travel" rear. Fifty millimetres at the rear is comfort travel on any bike; the air spring is the interesting part, because it can be tuned to rider weight where a coil cannot.

Eahora's photograph of the rear end. The published specification is an air unit with damping at 50 mm of travel.

Drivetrain. Shimano's RD-TY300 derailleur and MF-TZ500-7 freewheel, on a 44T chainring and 170 mm cranks. These are entry-level parts, they are cheap, and every bike shop stocks them — a defensible saving on a machine that does most of its work on the throttle.

The MF-TZ500 stamp is legible on the freewheel. Quote that part number when you order a replacement.

Lighting and cockpit. A 2,000-lumen, 20 W headlight with the horn built into the same housing, and a taillight with a brake blinker. The display is a 4-inch color LCD with a motors switch, Bluetooth and a USB charge port.

Two thousand lumens is a driving light rather than a be-seen light.

The motors switch lives on this display: it is how you choose one-wheel or all-wheel drive.

Twenty by four and a half inches at 28 to 33 psi. Most of this bike's ride comfort is set at the pressure gauge rather than at the shock.

Where the page disagrees with itself

One conflict on the page, and it is small but worth knowing because it is the one an AI answer repeats back to you.

The tire width is published twice, differently, on the same page. The specification block and the INNOVA heading both say "20" x 4.5"". A marketing paragraph two screens up says the bike uses "20" x 5.0" all-terrain extra-fat tires". When we asked an AI engine about this bike on 2 September 2026, it reported 5.0 inches — reading the marketing sentence rather than the specification block.

Take the specification block: 20 × 4.5. It is the row that names the tire maker, gives the pressure range, and is the number a replacement is ordered against.

Two smaller gaps, stated because they are gaps and not errors. No peak wattage is published for this build, where the Juliet Pro II publishes both nominal and peak — so the 2,500 W figure cannot be compared with a peak-only listing. And "max load" is never defined as including or excluding the machine, which is what makes the payload section necessary.

What owners and testers report

This section is other people's words, attributed to each source.

The published third-party record is one aggregated summary and three rated expert reviews, all covering the Romeo family rather than this build alone. BikeRide compiled them on 20 November 2024 under Reda Ashour's byline and scores the family 78/100 from three rated expert reviews.

What it credits. Climbing: experts are "impressed with the Romeo's ability to climb steep hills while maintaining good speed and easily keep up with traffic on the flats." Braking, specifically on this build: "Experts testing the Romeo II are pleased with the stopping power." Suspension: "Reviewers say the adjustable suspension absorbs road impacts well." And a measured range figure on the single-motor build: "a 220lb reviewer gets 77.2 miles of riding range on pavement."

What it counts against. Weight: "The Romeo is extremely heavy at 124.6lb to 150.9lb. This rules out lifting it or pedaling without assistance." Pedal assist, on this build: "A tester of the Romeo II reports it takes four pedal revolutions for PAS to activate." Above 20 mph: "Reviewers report ghost pedaling." The battery gauge: "A reviewer dislikes the fluctuating battery indicator, which is based on voltage sag."

And the one that should decide a nervous buyer, quoted whole because paraphrasing it would soften it: "Many buyers receive defective bikes or report components breaking shortly after purchase. This is worsened by unhelpful and unresponsive customer support." Its bottom line reads: "the apparent quality control issues make the Romeo a risky purchase."

That is a serious assessment from the most complete third-party record that exists, it is about the family rather than this build specifically, and it is dated November 2024. It is also the strongest argument for buying this bike from a US dealer who answers the phone, which is the next section.

The warranty, and who files the claim

Eahora's warranty page has a section headed "1. Warranty Coverage & Duration". It lists exclusions, and it states no duration.

The only period published anywhere on the page sits at the bottom: "Claims deadline: 1 year from purchase date", alongside the site header's "1 Year Warranty".

None of those clauses is unusual for the category. Put a reminder in your phone for the shipping-damage window: it closes ten days after delivery, and it wants photographs and a signed bill of lading. Freight damage on a 143 lb crate is the most common thing that goes wrong with an e-bike purchase, and the clock starts the day it lands.

We give you a shorter window and take the harder half of the job. Inspect inside 48 hours and send photographs; from there the carrier claim is ours to file and not yours.

Buying it from us

Every row cites the document behind it, and one row says what we will not claim.

And the reverse sell, which we mean. On a bike whose published height range is wider than its seat can serve, it earns its place. Email support@redtailebikes.com with your height, your weight, your state and what you want to do with it, and we will tell you straight — including when the answer is a different bike. On this model the answer is a different bike more often than usual, because one seat height cannot serve a 10-inch range.

A term to read before you commit: we take change-of-mind returns only on unopened boxes, inside 72 hours, with a 15% restocking fee. Freight is why. If you are unsure, ask first — that is what the email is for, and it costs nothing.

The honest ledger

What the record supports:

• The most conservative range claim on our shelf: 26.00 Wh/mi assumed at the top figure, against a median of 12.69 across 87 comparable bikes, and 40.00 at the throttle figure — heavier than any of them.
• A published weight that an independent party confirms exactly. BikeRide lists 143.3 lb.
• Two rider-height statements that agree, which the same maker's other pages do not manage.
• Stopping power credited by testers, on four-piston calipers and 180 mm rotors.
• An air rear shock, tunable to rider weight where a coil is not.
• A clean CPSC record, checked against the complete 359-row warning listing and the recall API, both with passing controls.
• A 3,120 Wh pack that recomputes exactly — 52 V × 60 Ah.
• Price parity with the maker, and free shipping on top of it.

What counts against it:

• The charge-time claim cannot be met by the charger in the box: a 7.58-hour lossless floor against a published 7.5-hour ceiling, with BikeRide's own figure at 7.5–9.
• One fixed 34-inch seat height serving a published 5'4" – 6'2" range, with a tester reporting the top end fails above 5'10".
• 186.7 lb of payload on the conservative reading of a rating Eahora does not define.
• Nothing about certification is published, and the AI answers filling that silence assert a standard the record does not support.
• The published 2,500 W and 40 mph sit outside 49 of 51 state definitions.
• The tire width is published two ways on one page, and the marketing figure is the one the engines repeat.
• No peak wattage is published, so the 2,500 W cannot be compared with peak-only listings.
• BikeRide's family record reports defective units and unresponsive support, and calls the Romeo "a risky purchase" on quality-control grounds.
• No full range test of this build exists anywhere, on any of its four published figures.

Who should buy it

Buy it if you are around 5'8" to 5'10", you and your gear come in under about 185 lb, and you have private land or permitted trail to ride the Romeo II on. For $2,299 you get the longest honestly-claimed range in the family, brakes testers praise, and a tunable air shock — and you get it from a US address that answers, which the third-party record says matters here more than usual.

Buy something else if the payload is what stops you. The Romeo Ultra II is rated to 500 lb against this bike's 330, and our review of it works through the trade.

Look at the Juliet Pro II if the seat is what stops you. Same maker, step-through frame, and a saddle adjustable from 32.6 to 40.5 inches.

Look at the Romeo Pro II if you want more power in the same shape, and read our review of it first — it has the same charge-time arithmetic problem, further from meeting it.

Look at the Romeo Pro if the price is what stops you. It is the family's entry at $1,899 — one motor instead of this bike's two, 2,880 Wh instead of 3,120, and our review shows the two spec rows Eahora revised on it this year.

And if the words "risky purchase" in a third-party summary are what stops you, that is a reasonable place to stop. We would rather you bought a different bike than a bike you distrust.

New: our Eahora brand profile answers the brand-level questions this page does not — who owns the trademark, where the bikes ship from, the federal safety record, the warranty terms, and all 23 models we stock screened against the 750-watt line.

Before you buy: the checklist

• ☐ Measure your inseam against 34 inches. The seat height is a single fixed number and no adjustment exists.
• ☐ Add up your own weight plus everything you carry, and compare it with 186.7 lb. Ask us which reading of the 330 lb rating applies before you load it.
• ☐ Read your state's row in our e-bike law guide before you order rather than after it.
• ☐ Plan an overnight charge. The charger's own output puts a full charge above 7.5 hours.
• ☐ Plan on 78 to 90 miles if you ride on the throttle. Eahora publishes that figure for throttle-only riding.
• ☐ Photograph the crate before you cut it open, and report any damage to us within 48 hours.
• ☐ Ask us for the certification documents before you order if that matters to you, and let us tell you what we get back.
• ☐ Email us your height, weight, state and use. We will tell you if this is the wrong bike.

Limitations of this review

1. We sell this bike. Every figure here traces to a document you can open, which is the only guard against that conflict that actually works.
2. Nobody at Redtail has ridden, weighed, charged or range-tested this machine. Every performance number is a published claim or another party's measurement, attributed.
3. BikeRide's summary covers the Romeo family, not the Romeo II alone. Where a finding names this build we say so; where it does not, it is reported as a family finding.
4. BikeRide's summary is dated 20 November 2024. Quality-control and support findings from that date may or may not describe what ships today, and neither is a figure we publish as our own.
5. The 7.58-hour figure is a theoretical floor, computed at 100% charger efficiency with no taper. The real charge time is longer than 7.58 hours, which is the point.
6. The Wh-per-mile figures are arithmetic on published claims, not measurements of any bike's real consumption.
7. No search-volume or difficulty figure appears anywhere on this page. Our keyword tool has no dated export inside the freshness window, so the demand behind this page is recorded as observed strings instead of priced numbers.
8. The certification finding describes the published record only. Eahora may hold certificates it has chosen not to put on the page.
9. Expiry conditions. Re-check this page if Eahora changes the specification block, publishes a certificate, revises the charge-time or seat-height figures, or if any independent test of this build appears.

The source register

T5 sources — AI summaries, content farms and unattributed spec aggregators — are not cited anywhere on this page. Where an AI answer appears above, it is reported as a measured artefact of what buyers are being told, never as evidence of a fact.

References

1. Eahora. Romeo II product page. Retrieved 2 September 2026. eahoraebike.com/products/eahora-romeo-ii — every specification, geometry and price figure on this page.
2. Eahora. Romeo II product record (JSON). Retrieved 2 September 2026. eahoraebike.com/products/eahora-romeo-ii.json — the second retrieval of price and availability.
3. Eahora. Warranty. Retrieved 2 September 2026. eahoraebike.com/pages/warranty — all quoted warranty clauses.
4. Eahora. Expert Q & A: The Most Frequently Asked Questions About Eahora E-bikes. 12 April 2024. eahoraebike.com/blogs/news/… — the "all our batteries have passed UL certification" sentence.
5. United States Code. 15 U.S.C. § 2085(b), Low-speed electric bicycles. law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/2085 — under 750 W and under 20 mph.
6. Alaska Statutes. AS 28.90.990(a)(20)-(22). akleg.gov/basis/statutes.asp — no e-bike definition published.
7. Kentucky Revised Statutes. KRS 189.010. apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/statutes/… — no e-bike definition published.
8. California Vehicle Code. § 312.5. leginfo.legislature.ca.gov — the 750 W ceiling.
9. Texas Transportation Code. § 664.001. statutes.capitol.texas.gov — the 750 W ceiling.
10. Florida Statutes. § 316.003(23). flsenate.gov — the 750 W ceiling.
11. New York Vehicle and Traffic Law. § 102-c. nysenate.gov — the 25 mph ceiling.
12. Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes. 75 Pa.C.S. § 102. palegis.us — the 20 mph ceiling.
13. Massachusetts General Laws. c.90 § 1. malegislature.gov — the 20 mph ceiling.
14. Rhode Island General Laws. § 31-1-3(g). webserver.rilegislature.gov — the 1,492 W ceiling.
15. US Consumer Product Safety Commission. Product Safety Warning listing (complete). Downloaded 2 September 2026. cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/recall-data/… — 359 rows, none naming Eahora.
16. US Consumer Product Safety Commission. Recall REST service. Queried 2 September 2026. saferproducts.gov/RestWebServices/Recall — 0 records for Eahora.
17. US Energy Information Administration. Electric Power Monthly, Table 5.6.A. June 2026 data. eia.gov/electricity/monthly/… — 18.34 cents per kilowatt-hour, US residential average.
18. BikeRide. 21 Reasons to/NOT to Buy Eahora Romeo. Published 20 November 2024 by Reda Ashour. bikeride.com/eahora-romeo — the 7.5–9 hour charge time, the 143.3 lb weight, the 5'10" fit ceiling and the tester findings.
19. UL Solutions. Electric bicycle (e-bike) testing and certification. Retrieved 2 September 2026. ulsolutions.com/services/… — what UL 2849 and UL 2271 cover.
20. Redtail eBikes. Shipping policy. redtailebikes.com/policies/shipping-policy — free contiguous-US shipping, 1–3 day dispatch.
21. Redtail eBikes. Refund policy. redtailebikes.com/policies/refund-policy — the 48-hour inspection window and the carrier-claim commitment.

Frequently asked questions

How fast is the Eahora Romeo II?

Eahora publishes "28+ Mph(40mph) for both pedal-assist and throttle" — a 28 mph default with a 40 mph maximum. Those published figures sit outside the electric-bicycle definition in 49 of the 51 US jurisdictions we screened, so read your state before planning a route.

How far will the Eahora Romeo II go on one charge?

Eahora publishes 108–120 miles with pedal assist and 78–90 miles without. Divided by the 3,120 Wh pack, those assume 26.00 to 40.00 watt-hours per mile — heavier, and so more believable, than 80 of the 87 comparable bikes we sell. No independent range test of this build exists.

How much does the Eahora Romeo II weigh?

Eahora publishes 143.3 lb with the 30 lb battery installed, and BikeRide's facts table lists the same figure — one of the few weights in this category an independent party confirms exactly.

How long does the Eahora Romeo II take to charge?

Eahora publishes 6–7.5 hours from the 58.8 V, 7 A charger in the box. That charger delivers 411.6 watts, and 3,120 watt-hours divided by 411.6 watts is 7.58 hours with no losses at all — above the published ceiling. BikeRide's own facts table lists the family at 7.5 to 9 hours. Plan an overnight charge.

What is the Eahora Romeo II's payload capacity?

Eahora publishes a 330 lb maximum load. Subtracting the published 143.3 lb bike leaves 186.7 lb for rider and cargo. Eahora leaves the basis of that rating undefined, which is why the answer to "can I carry this?" is an email and not a number.

Can you adjust the seat height on the Eahora Romeo II?

No. The geometry block publishes 34 inches as a single value and the components block explains why: "No Seatpost for motorcycle-style seat." There is no post to raise or lower, which is why this bike suits a narrower height band than its published 5'4" – 6'2" range suggests.

Is a 2,500-watt electric bike street legal?

Not as an electric bicycle. The federal definition in 15 U.S.C. § 2085(b) caps a low-speed electric bicycle at under 750 watts and under 20 mph, and 45 of the 49 states with a definition set a 750 W ceiling of their own. A 2,500 W machine is regulated as whatever else your state's vehicle code covers.

What does unlocking the Eahora Romeo II change?

Not its legal status. Eahora already publishes both speeds — 28 mph as shipped, 40 mph maximum — and the figure that puts this bike outside 45 state definitions is its 2,500 W nominal wattage, which no display setting changes. We publish no method; read your state's row instead.

Is the Eahora Romeo II UL certified?

Eahora publishes nothing about certification for this model. Its site search returns no results for UL 2849 or UL 2271, both of its certification pages return 404, and the strings "UL/CE", "UL 2849" and "UL 2271" appear nowhere on the product page. The whole record is one 2024 FAQ line saying its batteries "have passed UL certification", with no standard attached.

Has the Eahora Romeo II been recalled?

No. Eahora appears in none of the 359 rows of the CPSC's complete Product Safety Warning listing as downloaded on 2 September 2026, and the CPSC recall API returns no records for it. Both checks were validated against a brand known to carry warnings first.

What is the difference between the Romeo II and the Romeo Pro II?

The Romeo II is the 2,500 W build — two 1,250 W motors on a 52 V, 3,120 Wh pack. The Romeo Pro II is the 4,000 W build at $2,599. Both share the frame, the motorcycle-style seat and the 20-inch fat tires.

What tires does the Eahora Romeo II use?

The specification block says "INNOVA 20" x 4.5" fat tires with tube (28-33 psi)", and a marketing paragraph on the same page says 20 × 5.0. Take the specification block: it names the maker and the pressure range, and it is what a replacement is ordered against.

What brakes does the Romeo II have?

Hydraulic disc brakes with motor cutoff, on four-piston calipers and 180 mm rotors. BikeRide's summary records that "Experts testing the Romeo II are pleased with the stopping power."

What does it cost to charge?

A full charge is 3.12 kWh. At the EIA's June 2026 US residential average of 18.34 cents per kilowatt-hour, that is about 57 cents — roughly 0.48 cents per mile at the 120-mile figure and 0.73 cents at the 78-mile throttle figure.

Is the Eahora Romeo II a good first e-bike?

No. A 143 lb machine with a published 40 mph, a fixed 34-inch seat and figures that sit outside 49 of 51 state definitions is a second or third e-bike. Our buying guide covers what a first one should have.

Does the Romeo II come with lights and a rack?

Lights yes, rack no. Eahora publishes a 2,000-lumen headlight with a built-in horn, a taillight with a brake blinker, and front and rear plastic fenders. The rear rack and basket are listed as optional.

The bottom line

The Eahora Romeo II is the cheapest dual-motor bike in the Romeo family and, on the evidence, the one whose numbers hold together best. Its range claim is the most conservative on our shelf, its published weight is the rare one an independent party confirms, and its two rider-height statements agree with each other.

The reviews index explains the arithmetic behind that judgement: every range claim we publish is divided by the pack it runs on before either number is believed.

Three numbers decide whether it is yours. The seat is a fixed 34 inches and cannot move, which narrows a published 10-inch height range to roughly 5'8"–5'10". The payload leaves 186.7 lb on the conservative reading. And the charge-time line cannot be met by the charger in the box — plan overnight.

If those three come back in your favour, this is a lot of bike for $2,299 — and we will ship it free, file the carrier claim if it arrives damaged, and answer the phone.

---

Written by Milad Ghobadibeygvand, BScN (Western University, 2014), Redtail eBikes. Verified 2 September 2026. We sell this bike; every claim on this page links to the document behind it. Corrections to support@redtailebikes.com — we publish them.