The best electric bike San Jose riders can buy depends on which of the city's four grounds you live on, and on who is doing the riding. Most of San Jose is flat enough that the hill never decides the bike. The foothills on three sides are a different city, and so is a rider who has not been on a bicycle in twenty years.
This guide measures every street block in all 297 of the City's own neighborhoods on 1-meter lidar, puts your weight, height, load and riding history into the arithmetic, and ends with a matrix that resolves 2,880 combinations of place, person and use into a machine or an honest gap.
Quick Answer. For most of San Jose, the Eunorau FLASH LITE ST at $1,899 clears more of this city's situations than any other: 82 lb, a 440 lb ceiling, a 4'8"–6'4" rider range, and 9.9 mph up an 8% block at 250 lb. If you are 5'6" to 6'1" riding solo, the Eunorau META275 1.0 does the flat city for $1,399.
In the Almaden, Evergreen and Alum Rock foothills, buy the 68 lb Addmotor Kunlun if the bike must fold or be carried, and the 750 W FLASH LITE 2.0 if it must carry a load, 440 lb against 280. And if you have not ridden in years, the answer has three wheels: the DWMEIGI MG708 Hera at $1,499 stands up on its own at every stop.
The short version. Eunorau FLASH LITE ST, $1,899 for a normal San Jose ride; Eunorau META275 1.0, $1,399 if you fit its range and want the cheapest torque-sensor commuter here; DWMEIGI MG708 Hera, $1,499 if balance is the question. Free shipping to every address in the lower 48, US warranty support, and Shop Pay installments at checkout for buyers who qualify.
Buy the FLASH LITE ST — $1,899297 neighborhoods · 35,632 blocks at 1 meter · 2,880 rider situations run, 1,610 resolved into a machine · 17 bikes matched from 4 makers across 8 rides. Your street, your ride, your body, and the machine that fits all three. Every figure on this page was last verified September 21, 2026, against the file it came from.
Written and reviewed by Milad Ghobadibeygvand, BScN (Western University, 2014), Redtail eBikes. Corrections: support@redtailebikes.com.
What we measured, and how
Every grade on this page comes from USGS 3DEP 1-meter bare-earth lidar, project CA_SantaClaraCounty_2020_A20, sampled along the City of San Jose's own public and private street centerlines. That is 36,649 street segments retrieved, of which 35,632 were graded, 196 were held back because the model was reading a bridge deck or a tunnel roof rather than a road, and 821 were dropped for being freeway, ramp or under 20 meters long.
Sixteen lidar tiles were chosen by computing which cells actually carry city streets; a rectangle would have missed one and bought a gigabyte of empty hillside.
The chain was checked before any number was believed. Eight published USGS point elevations across the city, from 0.9 m to 901.9 m above sea level, were re-read through the same tiles, projection and datum: the worst disagreement was 0.24 m.
The City's own layers supply the rest: 297 neighborhood polygons built from census block groups, the five-year crash file, bikeways by Caltrans class, trail reaches by status, and a pavement condition score for every scored street.
Grades come two ways because they answer two questions, and both are computed on the 1 m lidar. The end-to-end grade is what a block costs you in total. The pitch is the steepest sustained 30 meters inside it, which is what your legs meet at the worst moment.
Before any street was named for its pitch, 463 blocks had that figure withheld: 359 sit on a bridge or over a tunnel, where bare earth reads the slope under the deck; 100 carry a step of more than 1.5 m in five meters, which is a wall or a staircase; and four are dips inside near-flat blocks. Their end-to-end grades stay in every statistic, because both ends of a bridge stand on the ground.
Every machine figure is the maker's own published number, read from its product record, its rendered page, its manuals and its blog, and recomputed here. Where a maker publishes no bike weight, this page computes no speed for it and says so.
The thresholds this page chose, an 8 mph climb floor, the 50 lb and 70 lb carry lines, the 20, 60 and 120 lb loads and an easy effort at half of critical power, are named as choices wherever they appear; every other figure is measured or the maker's.
In this guide
- San Jose is four riding grounds
- What a San Jose grade costs you
- Who is riding, and what that changes — weight, height, age, fitness, riding experience and load
- Heat, rain and the dark commute
- Theft, and the bike that comes indoors
- California's 750-watt line, and San Jose's own rules
- Where a bicycle gets hit
- The decision matrix
- The best electric bike San Jose can buy, by what you are riding for
- Every San Jose neighborhood, measured
- If you call your neighborhood something else
- Every block of the city, measured
- Bikeways, trails and pavement · Bike, light rail, Caltrain and BART · Is there a San Jose e-bike rebate?
- The honest ledger · Questions San Jose riders ask · Before you buy · The bottom line
- Limitations · How we verified this · References
San Jose is four riding grounds
Take the 90th-percentile block grade of each neighborhood, meaning the grade nine blocks in ten sit under, and the city sorts itself into four grounds. The line between them is measured, and the population beside each class is the City's own block-group count for those polygons.
| Ground | 90th-percentile block grade | Neighborhoods | Residents | Graded blocks | What it means on a bike |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat | under 2% | 237 | 855,244 | 22,869 | nothing the motor notices |
| Rolling | 2% to 4% | 21 | 74,630 | 2,445 | you feel it; a 500 W machine does not |
| Hilly | 4% to 8% | 23 | 86,140 | 3,287 | a real climb on the way home |
| Steep | 8% and over | 14 | 38,815 | 2,067 | the grade decides the bike |
The graded-block column sums to 30,668 of the city's 35,632 graded blocks; the other 4,964 lie outside every one of the 297 polygons.
Eighty-one percent of the residents in these 297 polygons live on flat ground, and the rest of the page is built around that fact: for four riders in five, the terrain test is passed by every legal machine buyable on our store today, and the decision moves to the rider, the load, the storage and the law.
The other fifth live where the hills start.
The steep fourteen, in order of their 90th-percentile grade, are Suncrest (13.8%), Mount Pleasant Foothills (13.4%), East Foothills (12.7%), Los Alamitos Creek (10.9%), Sierra Vista Hills (10.5%), Warner Heights (10.2%), Coyote and Senter (9.9%), Noble (8.9%), Almaden Country Club (8.8%), Quicksilver (8.7%), Communications Hill (8.7%), Evergreen Valley High (8.5%), Santa Teresa Hills (8.5%) and Almaden Guadalupe Park (8.3%).
Communications Hill is the most populous of them at 8,493 residents, and the one with the most blocks whose pitch is withheld: 32, 22 of them under the wall-or-stair rule and 10 on a structure.
There is a measured line below which the hill never decides. Every machine on this page that carries a computed speed holds at least 8 mph on its motor alone, with a 280 lb rider aboard, on any grade up to 3.50%. Of the 35,632 graded blocks, 3,844 exceed that on their end-to-end grade or on a pitch that survived the holds above.
Those are 10.8% of the city's blocks, and 39 of the 237 flat neighborhoods hold at least one of them, usually one or two blocks. The list is published lower down, by name.
The one number to carry into the picks. Look up your neighborhood in the table. If its 90th-percentile grade is under 3.5%, buy on the rider, the load and the storage rows of the matrix. If it is over, the grade row is the first one you read.
What a San Jose grade costs you
The physics is the same for every rider: the motor's rated watts, less what the drivetrain and the tires eat, against the weight of rider plus bike being lifted up the grade. The bike's weight is the maker's published figure, the rider's is yours, and the motor figure is the rated one that California law is read against, never a peak.
That arithmetic, on the reference machine, reads as follows, the 750 W Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0 at the maker's 92 lb, on the motor alone, for six rider weights and San Jose's own measured grade bands.
| Block grade | 130 lb | 160 lb | 190 lb | 220 lb | 250 lb | 280 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) |
| 2% | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 20.0 (cap) | 19.7 | 19.1 |
| 4% | 18.9 | 17.9 | 17.0 | 16.1 | 15.2 | 14.4 |
| 6% | 16.0 | 14.8 | 13.7 | 12.8 | 11.9 | 11.1 |
| 8% | 13.6 | 12.4 | 11.3 | 10.4 | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| 10% | 11.7 | 10.5 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 8.0 | 7.4 |
| 15% | 8.4 | 7.5 | 6.7 | 6.1 | 5.6 | 5.2 |
| 27% | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.0 |
Speeds in mph, motor alone. The controller caps assistance at 20 mph as the machine ships (the maker's default is class 2), so on the flat every rider sits on the cap and the uncapped physics, which would put the motor at 25 to 26 mph, is not what you get.
The 27% row is the top of San Jose's measured grade bands: no block that survived the holds reads steeper than 25.5%, and the 34 that read 27% or more were bridge abutments, walls and stairs, whose pitches are withheld (Every block).
Read the 8% row left to right and you have the finding that shapes this guide (Chorley et al. 2020 for the rider's power). The same bike on the same block holds 13.6 mph for a 130 lb rider and 8.9 mph for a 280 lb rider.
Add the rider's own legs at an easy effort and the gap barely moves: at 8%, a 130 lb rider gains 0.4 mph by going from untrained to trained legs, and a 250 lb rider gains 0.7 mph, while the weight difference between them costs 3.1 mph. Across every grade from 2% up, what the rider weighs moves the speed two to eight times as much as how fit they are.
The gap is widest on the 8% blocks that define the hilly and steep grounds.
On the flat the sign reverses, and that is real physics rather than noise (critical power scales with body mass). Sustainable power scales with body mass, so before the cap a heavier rider has more absolute watts and nothing to lift them against: 0.4 mph in the heavier rider's favor at 0%. It matters here more than in San Francisco, because most of San Jose is that flat. The heavier rider is not slower in this city.
They are slower on the 14 steep neighborhoods and on 3,844 blocks, and the matrix names which.
Takeaway
- On flat San Jose, rider weight does not cost speed. Buy on payload, fit and storage.
- On any block over 3.5%, the heaviest rider on the lightest legal motor is the first to drop under 8 mph. From there, torque and a 750 W rating are what you are paying for.
- Fitness buys 0.4 to 0.7 mph on a hill. Weight decides two to eight times more. Neither is a judgment; both are arithmetic.
Who is riding, and what that changes
The Los Angeles and New York guides matched a bike to a neighborhood. Two riders on the same block in Almaden are not having the same ride, so this page matches the bike to the person as well: six things about the rider, each one a row of the matrix, each one from a published number.
Your weight is the biggest single input
The table above is the reason. A rider's mass is most of what climbs the hill, so every speed here is published for a range of rider weights. Read your own weight down the rows below: on the 750 W reference machine at an easy pedal, the gap between a 130 lb and a 250 lb rider is worth two to six times what going from untrained to trained legs buys you.
| Grade | 130 lb rider, untrained legs | 250 lb rider, untrained legs | What 120 lb of rider costs | What trained legs buy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | 23.8 mph | 22.6 mph | 1.2 mph | 0.6 mph |
| 4% | 20.5 mph | 18.2 mph | 2.3 mph | 0.7 mph |
| 8% | 15.2 mph | 12.1 mph | 3.1 mph | 0.6 mph |
| 10% | 13.1 mph | 10.1 mph | 3.0 mph | 0.6 mph |
| 15% | 9.6 mph | 7.2 mph | 2.4 mph | 0.4 mph |
The second half of the weight question is the ceiling. Every payload figure here is the maker's own published maximum for rider plus everything carried (Eunorau, Qiolor, Addmotor, DWMEIGI), and the matrix subtracts your load from it before it lets a machine through.
The ceilings on this slate run from 280 lb (Addmotor Foldtan M-160 and Kunlun) to 550 lb (Addmotor M-380 tandem trike), with 440 lb on the Eunorau FLASH LITE pair, MAX-CARGO and ONE-TRIKE, 400 lb on the Qiolor TIGER RL, 330 lb on the two 750 W DWMEIGI trikes, 300 lb on the Defender, URUS and Hera, and 286 lb on the META range.
A 250 lb rider with a 60 lb child seat and groceries needs 310 lb of ceiling and has eight of the fifteen adult machines to choose from; at 280 lb with a 120 lb cargo load, six remain. The finding is that a heavier rider should buy more torque and a higher ceiling, never that they should be lighter.
Your height is a published range, or it is nothing
Every pick carries the manufacturer's own recommended rider-height range, and the matrix requires that range to contain you before the machine qualifies. Sixteen of the seventeen machines publish one. The widest is the FLASH LITE ST at 4'8" to 6'4"; the narrowest that still spans most adults is the META275 1.0 at 5'6" to 6'1", which is why the cheapest commuter here qualifies in fewer situations than the dearer one.
The Qiolor TIGER RL stops at 5'9". The DWMEIGI MG708 Hera starts at 4'11". No height fit is claimed for the MG2301 Silverado HD anywhere on this page; it sits in the matrix as unconfirmed on that row, and item 2 of the Limitations says why.
One owner's sentence belongs beside the FLASH LITE's range. On the maker's own review page a rider writes, of the 24-inch Flash: "I'm 5'3 and it took some practice to get on it since it's a little tall for me." The range is the maker's; the mount is the rider's. If getting on is the hard part, the Hera starts at 4'11" with a parking brake.
If a low mount is the point, read the three-wheel area, where the Hera's 4'11" floor and a parking brake change the question.
Age is law plus two physical questions
No maker on this slate publishes a rider age; what they publish is a height range, which is the fit constraint a buyer can actually check. Age lives in the law, and California's ages are exact.
Under 18, a helmet is required on any bicycle, electric or not (Veh. Code § 21212(a)). Under 16, a class 3 electric bicycle may not be operated at all, and every class 3 rider of any age wears a helmet (§ 21213).
And since January 1, 2026, "a person shall not sell a class 3 electric bicycle to a person under 16 years of age", an infraction with a fine of up to $250 (§ 21212.5, added by AB 965). That last one binds us as the seller, so the kids' area of this page carries class 2 and lower machines only.
What age changes physically is not converted into a speed here, because the physiology this page cites was measured on twenty men with a mean age of 39 and stretching it across decades would be an invention. What age does change is what a rider can hold up at a stop and what they can carry up a flight, and both are answered below with a machine rather than an adjective.
Fitness is the smallest of the four
The rider's own power is in the model, from a published study. Chorley, Bott, Marwood and Lamb measured the critical power of twenty adult male cyclists: trained riders at 4.17 ± 0.60 W/kg and untrained at 3.19 ± 0.35 W/kg (Eur J Appl Physiol 2020;120:2349–2359, Table 1).
Four things are true every time those numbers are used. Critical power is a maximal sustainable effort, not a commute; a rider producing it arrives wrecked.
The "easy effort" this page models is half of it, which is our editorial choice and not the study's finding. The study's "untrained" group still played sport weekly, so a first-time e-bike buyer is likely below it, and this page says so rather than flattering you. And the sample was twenty men, mean age 39; applying W/kg across sexes and ages is an extrapolation and is named as one.
On San Jose's grades that easy effort is worth 0.4 to 0.7 mph. The motor-alone speeds are published beside it because they are the honest floor for a rider who does not want to arrive sweating, which is why most people buy the bike.
Riding experience is a gate
The matrix has an axis the earlier guides did not: whether you have ridden a bicycle in the last year, or have not ridden in years. A rider in the second group is matched to three wheels only, in every use, and a low step-through is not a substitute. The step-through lowers the mount. It does not lower the balance requirement, and balance is the whole question.
The physics is published. A bicycle balances itself only inside a speed window: for the benchmark bicycle, between the weave speed of about 4.3 m/s and the capsize speed of about 6.0 m/s, which is 9.6 to 13.4 mph (Meijaard, Papadopoulos, Ruina and Schwab, Proc. R. Soc. A 2007;463:1955–1982); the physical experiment that confirmed the model is Kooijman, Meijaard, Papadopoulos, Ruina and Schwab, Science 2011;332:339–342.
Below 9.6 mph the rider does all of the balancing, and below 9.6 mph is where an 80 lb machine is mounted, started, stopped and dismounted.
| Speed | What holds the machine up |
|---|---|
| Below 9.6 mph | You do, entirely: mounting, starting, stopping and dismounting all happen here |
| 9.6 to 13.4 mph | The bicycle itself, inside the benchmark model's window |
| Any speed, three wheels | The third wheel; the balance moment is gone |
The Dutch road-safety institute puts it in one sentence: a bicycle on two wheels is a balance vehicle that falls over at low speed without action by the rider (SWOV report R-2020-22, p. 24). A tricycle has no such window. It stands.
The injury record points the same way, and each source is named with its limits. In an instrumented-bicycle experiment, pedelecs were less stable than conventional bicycles in the transition from standing to balance, regardless of the rider's age, and about 17% of pedelec injuries in that population came from falls while mounting or dismounting (Twisk, Platteel and Lovegrove, Accid Anal Prev 2017;105:109–116).
Among 3,658 Swiss e-cyclists, "inability to keep the balance" was among the crash causes cited most often (Hertach, Uhr, Niemann and Cavegn, Accid Anal Prev 2018;117:232–238), and in a Dutch case-control study e-bike riders were more likely than classic-bicycle riders to need emergency treatment after controlling for age, sex and use (Schepers, Fishman, den Hertog, Klein Wolt and Schwab, Accid Anal Prev 2014;73:174–180).
None of those is a study of tricycles, and this page does not claim a measured outcome for them.
It claims the physics: the third wheel removes the balance moment.
Age is not the trigger. The gap is. Whether you have been on a bicycle in the last year is a fact you can answer about yourself without being told anything about your body, and it is the row the matrix reads.
Five three-wheelers clear California's definition and this page's screen:
- the DWMEIGI MG708 Hera ($1,499, 350 W, 15 mph, a parking brake, 4'11" and up)
- the Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0 ($1,799, 500 W, 440 lb ceiling, folds)
- the DWMEIGI MG1703 ($1,999, 750 W)
- the DWMEIGI MG2301 Silverado HD ($2,899, 750 W, reverse gear, parking brake, folds)
- the Addmotor M-380 tandem ($4,099, two riders)
The three-wheel area matches them to San Jose's grounds.
Every one of those picks carries the maker's own limit. Eunorau: "a trike handles differently from a bicycle and does not lean naturally into turns. New riders should practice in a flat, open area and slow down before cornering." A Hera owner, on the maker's review page, translated from French: "It does not ride like a bike. It takes a while to be comfortable."
The reason a rigid three-wheeler can lift an inside wheel in a fast turn is the same reason a tall vehicle can, and NHTSA defines it: the "Static Stability Factor is one-half the track width of a vehicle divided by the height of its center of gravity" (66 FR 3388, January 12, 2001).
No maker on this slate publishes a center-of-gravity height, so this page computes no tipping speed for any named trike; it tells you to take the first corners slowly in an empty lot, which is what the makers say too.
Load is a row of the matrix
The matrix runs every situation three ways: solo with a 20 lb kit, a child seat or groceries at 60 lb, and a cargo or two-kid load at 120 lb.
The load is added to your weight and checked against the maker's ceiling before the climb is computed, because a 190 lb rider with two children aboard is a 310 lb rider as far as the hill is concerned, and the 8% row of the table above moves from 11.3 mph to 8.3 mph when it happens.
On this slate, the machines built for the third load level are the Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0 at 440 lb, the two FLASH LITEs and the ONE-TRIKE at the same 440 lb, and the M-380 at 550 lb; the cargo area sets out who they fit.
Heat, rain and the dark commute
San Jose's season is mild enough that it rarely stops a ride, and specific enough that it decides three specifications. The numbers are NOAA's 1991–2020 normals for San Jose International Airport (station USW00023293) and the station's own daily observations from 2021 through 2025, 1,825 of 1,826 days present.
| Month | Normal high (°F) | Normal rain (in) | Days with 0.1 in or more | Sunset, mid-month |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | 59.8 | 2.80 | 5.0 | 5:14 pm |
| February | 62.4 | 2.69 | 5.6 | 5:47 pm |
| March | 65.9 | 2.08 | 5.3 | 7:15 pm |
| April | 69.2 | 1.07 | 3.4 | 7:42 pm |
| May | 73.8 | 0.39 | 0.8 | 8:09 pm |
| June | 79.1 | 0.18 | 0.3 | 8:29 pm |
| July | 80.8 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 8:27 pm |
| August | 81.4 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 7:59 pm |
| September | 80.7 | 0.07 | 0.2 | 7:15 pm |
| October | 75.8 | 0.53 | 1.2 | 6:30 pm |
| November | 66.1 | 1.33 | 3.1 | 4:57 pm |
| December | 59.5 | 2.29 | 5.3 | 4:51 pm |
Rain is a season. The airport's normal year carries 13.48 inches, and 90.9% of it falls from November through April. In the five observed years there were 242 days with measurable rain, about 48 a year, almost all of them in that window. The specification that follows is fenders and sealed electronics for one third of the year, and a chain you wipe down in February.
Heat is a battery question. The daily record shows 95 days at or above 90 °F in five years, nineteen a year, and eleven days at or above 100 °F. Lithium packs are charged indoors and parked in shade on those days; read the manual's charging temperature window, because a July garage is where it matters.
Freezing is close to absent: three nights at or below 32 °F in five years, against a normal of 3.2 a year concentrated in December and January. No pick here needs a winter battery strategy.
| Season | Days a year, measured | What it changes on the bike |
|---|---|---|
| Rain | about 48 days with measurable rain, 90.9% of the year's 13.48 inches from November through April | fenders, sealed electronics, a chain wiped down in February |
| Heat | 19 days at or above 90 °F, 2 at or above 100 °F | the pack charges indoors and parks in shade |
| Freezing | 0.6 nights at or below 32 °F | nothing; no winter battery strategy |
| Dark | 119 evenings with the sun down before 6 pm | § 21201(d) lights, and a check of what the box holds |
The dark is the specification that matters most, and it is a law. Computed at the city's centroid, the sun is down before 6 pm on 119 days a year (NOAA daily summaries and normals), a third of the calendar.
The count runs from the day the clocks go back on November 1, 2026 (sunset 6:10 pm the day before, 5:09 pm the day after) until February 27, with the earliest sunset of the year at 4:49 pm on December 6.
The City's crash file puts the daily peak for bicycle-involved collisions at 5 pm (144 of 1,638 over five years) and 6 pm (136), and the peak months are October (183) and November (162), the month the evening commute crosses into darkness.
Vehicle Code § 21201(d) requires, during darkness on a highway, sidewalk or bikeway, "a lamp emitting a white light that, while the bicycle is in motion, illuminates the highway, sidewalk, or bikeway in front of the bicyclist and is visible from a distance of 300 feet", a red rear reflector or light visible from 500 feet, pedal or ankle reflectors and side reflectors.
Read the maker's page for the light kit before the first dark ride: the URUS lists front and rear lights as not included, the EKIDS20 and EKIDS24 list a wheel reflector, and § 21201(d) sets what a night ride needs whatever the box holds, so the pedal and side reflectors are yours to check on delivery.
Takeaway
- November through April: fenders on, and a dry place for the charger.
- Nineteen 90 °F days a year: charge indoors, park in shade, read the manual's temperature window.
- 119 evenings a year in the dark, and 5 pm is the crash file's peak hour: your lights are equipment under § 21201(d).
Theft, and the bike that comes indoors
Where the frame sleeps outside, the pack sleeps inside.
Crime, for a bicycle buyer, is one question: where does the bike get stolen, and therefore does it sleep indoors. San Jose's police calls-for-service file cannot answer it, because the file does not distinguish a stolen bicycle from anything else stolen. The one source that records bicycle thefts to a place is Bike Index, the national registry of voluntarily registered bikes whose owners reported them stolen.
It is not a police record and not a census of theft; it skews toward the riders who registered before the theft and toward the brands those riders buy. It is, however, countable, and it records the location to the ZIP code.
Retrieved on September 16, 2026, the registry held 2,554 bikes reported stolen within ten miles of San Jose, retrieved in full against its own count. Of those, 2,443 carry a readable ZIP and 1,405 fall inside the 35 ZIP codes the City's own boundary layer places within San Jose. Since the start of 2021 that is 554 registered thefts; 40 of the 1,405 name the bike as electric.
Divided by each ZIP's Census population (ACS 2023 five-year, ZCTA totals) and by the 5.7 years of the window, the rate runs from nothing registered at all to 13.6 per 10,000 residents a year:
| ZIP | Registered thefts since 2021 | Per 10,000 residents per year | Quarter among San Jose ZIPs | Neighborhoods it covers (share of their land) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95113 | 19 | 13.60 | highest | Ballbach and SOFA 60%, Downtown and SOFA 48% |
| 95002 | 3 | 3.20 | highest | Alviso 23% |
| 95110 | 34 | 3.06 | highest | Goodyear Mastic, Guadalupe Washington, Coleman |
| 95134 | 47 | 2.72 | highest | Tasman and Zanker, Coyote Creek North |
| 95126 | 56 | 2.56 | highest | Alameda, O'Connor Park, Rose Garden, Stokes |
| 95112 | 79 | 2.43 | highest | Hyde Park, Japantown and Luna Park, Northside-Grant |
| 95133 | 23 | 1.41 | highest | Commercial, Berryessa Flea Market-BART |
| 95125 | 40 | 1.30 | highest | Cherry, The Willows, River Glen, South Stokes |
| 95128 | 23 | 1.20 | third | Fruitdale and Sherman Oaks, Parkmoor, Burbank |
| 95131 | 21 | 1.19 | third | Brokaw, North Valley, Flickinger, Vinci Park |
| 95129 | 24 | 1.03 | third | Mitty, Rogers, Strawberry Park, Country Lane |
| 95118 | 13 | 0.71 | third | Reed, Muir, Dentwood, Hammer |
| 95136 | 14 | 0.52 | second | Skyway and Monterey, The Woods, Pinehurst |
| 95123 | 19 | 0.47 | second | Palmia Park, Calero and Oak Ridge, Sakamota |
| 95124 | 14 | 0.47 | second | Steindorf-Doerr, Cambrian Park, Oster |
| 95122 | 12 | 0.40 | second | Owsley, Tropicana and Lanai, Valley Palms |
| 95127 | 12 | 0.34 | second | Park Pleasant and Mount Pleasant, Lyndale, La Pala |
| 95132 | 6 | 0.26 | lowest | Sierramont, Piedmont Hills and St Victor, Majestic |
| 95111 | 5 | 0.15 | lowest | Los Arboles, Seven Trees and Lairon, Coyote and Senter |
| 95148 | 2 | 0.08 | lowest | Norwood, Valle Vista, The Glens, Quimby Oak |
| 95120 | 0 | none registered | lowest | Los Alamitos, Holy Spirit, Graystone, Singer Park |
The full 35-ZIP table, built on the City's ZIP boundary layer, is in the neighborhood table.
The median San Jose ZIP registers 0.52 thefts per 10,000 residents a year; the top quarter starts above 1.20. Downtown's 95113 stands alone at 13.6, and the honest reading of that figure is not "downtown is dangerous" but "downtown is where bicycles are left locked in public all day, by people who register them".
A neighborhood's figure is its ZIPs' rates weighted by land share, which assumes theft is spread evenly inside a ZIP; nobody has measured that, so the page calls it the registry rate for your ZIP and never your neighborhood's theft rate.
Two City rules attach. Every bicycle "placed or left unattended on a street or other public place shall be securely locked by the operator thereof" (San Jose Municipal Code § 11.72.100), and no retailer may sell a new bicycle in the city without a serial number stamped or cast on the frame (§ 11.72.080).
The registry shows why the serial matters: 78.2% of the 2,554 stolen bikes had one on file, and 39 of them, 1.5%, were later marked found.
Register the serial on the day the box opens.
| Where the bike sleeps | What the matrix requires of the machine |
|---|---|
| A garage or a ground floor | Nothing on storage; the climb, the ceiling and the fit decide |
| Outside, in a lower-theft ZIP | § 11.72.100's lock; no machine is excluded |
| Outside, in a highest-quarter-theft ZIP | The maker states that the battery comes off, so the pack sleeps indoors |
| Up a flight of stairs | The maker's bike weight at or under 70 lb, a two-person lift; 50 lb is the one-person line; both are this page's editorial lines |
What the theft band changes about the bike. In the matrix, a rider who keeps the machine outside in a highest-quarter ZIP is matched only to a machine whose maker states that the battery comes off, so the pack sleeps indoors and the frame is worth less to a thief.
Seven of the fifteen adult machines say so in their own words: the Qiolor TIGER RL, the Eunorau FLASH LITE ST, the Eunorau URUS 2.0, the Addmotor Foldtan M-160, and all three DWMEIGI trikes. The others may well have removable packs; the makers' pages do not state it, so the page does not claim it, and those machines appear in that column as unconfirmed rather than excluded.
The harder case is the rider who cannot leave the bike outside at all: someone on a rough block who carries the bike up the stairs every night. Then the maker's published weight outranks every other row. Nothing on this slate is a one-person carry; the lightest adult machine on this page is the 61.7 lb URUS.
Five machines sit under the two-person line this page draws at 70 lb: the URUS 2.0 (61.7 lb), the META20 (63.4 lb, folds), the Defender (66 lb), the Kunlun (68 lb, folds) and the META275 1.0 (68.4 lb). Both thresholds are this page's editorial lines.
If the flight is yours alone, buy the folder that fits a closet on the ground floor and the lock that fits the railing outside it.
California's 750-watt line, and San Jose's own rules
What an electric bicycle is in California
The Vehicle Code defines it in one sentence and three classes. § 312.5(a): "An 'electric bicycle' is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor that does not exceed 750 watts of power." Read the verb. A 750-watt motor does not exceed 750 watts, so 750 W is inside the definition, and every 750 W machine on this page was screened on that reading.
A class 1 assists only while pedaling and stops at 20 mph; a class 2 may be propelled by its motor alone and stops at 20 mph; a class 3 assists only while pedaling, stops at 28 mph, and carries a speedometer. The class is a limb of the same section, so a 20 mph throttle machine is a class 2 and a 28 mph throttle machine fits no class at all.
Three wheels count. § 231 defines a bicycle as a device "having one or more wheels" and closes with four words that settle the trike question: "An electric bicycle is a bicycle." Every tricycle on this page clears § 312.5(a) on the same limbs as the two-wheelers.
What the definition buys you is in § 24016(b): "A person operating an electric bicycle is not subject to the provisions of this code relating to financial responsibility, driver's licenses, registration, and license plate requirements, and an electric bicycle is not a motor vehicle." No license, no plate, no registration, no insurance mandate. The same section requires the manufacturer to certify compliance and label the class, and requires the motor to cut when the brakes are applied.
Above 750 W or 28 mph a machine stops being a bicycle and becomes something the Code registers and licenses; some machines we stock are built for private land at 2,000 W and more, and none of them appears on this page for that reason.
Ages, helmets and the seller's own rule
Under 18, a helmet on any bicycle, and a violation is an infraction with a fine of up to $25 (§ 21212).
Under 16, no class 3 at all, and a helmet on a class 3 at every age (§ 21213). And, since January 1, 2026, a rule on us: "A person shall not sell a class 3 electric bicycle to a person under 16 years of age", an infraction with a fine up to $250 (§ 21212.5).
Four of the machines here carry a class setting the rider can change, in the makers' own words: the FLASH LITE 2.0 page reads "Class 2 Speed limited Unlockable", the MAX-CARGO and URUS pages read "Class 3 Speed limited Unlockable", and the FLASH LITE ST page reads "Class 1/2/3/3C/4, Default: Class 2". All four ship with assistance stopping at 20 mph.
Two of them carry the maker's class 3 label as sold. On § 312.5(a)'s own limbs a throttle machine whose assist stops at 20 mph is a class 2, and § 21213's under-16 bar and all-ages helmet rule attach to class 3.
The label is what § 312.5(c) puts on the frame and what an officer reads, so until the maker relabels it this page treats both as class 3: no operator under 16, and a helmet at every age on the rider and on any passenger. A class 4 setting is outside § 312.5(a) altogether; a machine set that way is no longer an electric bicycle on a California street.
A rider who changes the setting has changed the class, the age floor and the label the law expects on the frame.
A passenger rides only on a separate seat attached to the bicycle, and a passenger "four years of age or younger, or weighs 40 pounds or less" rides in a seat with "adequate provision for retaining the passenger in place" (§ 21204(b)). That sentence is the cargo area's child-seat rule.
What San Jose adds, and the one thing it does not say
The City's code contains no electric-bicycle vocabulary at all. Swept on September 16, 2026, across the full Code of Ordinances (supplement of June 16, 2026): "bicycle" returns 56 sections, and "electric bicycle", "electric bike", "e-bike", "motorized bicycle" and "moped" return none.
What governs an e-bike in San Jose is the state code above plus the City's general bicycle and park rules, and the state code says a local authority may regulate bicycle registration, parking and operation on pedestrian and bicycle facilities so long as it does not conflict with the state (§ 21206).
One drafting gap is stated and left unresolved. The City defines "bicycle" for its own chapter as a device "propelled exclusively by human power" (San Jose Municipal Code § 11.04.021). Whether Chapter 11.72's bicycle rules therefore reach a class 1, 2 or 3 electric bicycle is unsettled on the face of the code.
This page treats the City's bicycle rules as applying to you, because the state code makes an electric bicycle a bicycle and a rider who treats a drafting gap as permission is making a bet with a police officer.
| Section | What it says | What it means for your ride |
|---|---|---|
| § 11.04.021 | a bicycle is "propelled exclusively by human power" | the chapter's reach over an e-bike is unsettled; this page applies it to you |
| § 11.72.190 with § 11.04.031 | no riding on a sidewalk "within any designated area" | five downtown blocks; everywhere else the sidewalk is open to you |
| § 11.72.200 | exemptions for police, anyone twelve or under, an accompanying adult, an obstructed bike lane | a parent riding beside a child is inside the exemption |
| § 13.44.100(C) and (D) | park paths and trails where posted, "a speed greater than fifteen miles per hour" unlawful | the creek trails at 15 mph |
| §§ 11.72.080 and 11.72.100 | keep the serial; lock an unattended bicycle | the theft section's two rules |
| Ord. 28855 (2010) | repealed the bicycle license, former §§ 11.72.020–.070 | no San Jose license exists |
Sidewalks are legal in San Jose, except on five downtown blocks. § 11.72.190 forbids riding on a sidewalk "within any designated area", and § 11.04.031 defines that area exhaustively: San Fernando Street from Cahill to Eleventh, and First, Second, Third and Fourth Streets from St. John to San Carlos, including their outer sidewalks.
§ 11.72.200 exempts police on duty, "any person twelve years of age or under", an adult accompanying a child of twelve or under, and anyone on a stretch where the adjacent bike lane is obstructed.
Everywhere else in the city the sidewalk is not prohibited to a bicycle, and the lighting rule of § 21201(d) applies there too.
Parks and trails are permission-by-posting, at 15 mph. § 13.44.100(D): the director "may designate" the paths and trails where riding is permitted, and "no person shall ride" on any park path or trail "unless such activity is permitted by notices posted by the director". § 13.44.100(C) sets the ceiling where nothing is posted: "a speed greater than fifteen miles per hour" is unlawful.
The state gives the City that power over its trails (§ 21207.5(b): a local authority "may prohibit, by ordinance, the operation of an electric bicycle or any class of electric bicycle on that trail"). Fifteen miles an hour is a specification decision on this page: it is the number the trail picks are chosen against, and it is why a 15 mph machine like the Hera is not at a disadvantage on the creek trails.
No San Jose bicycle license exists. The licensing sections (former §§ 11.72.020–.070) were repealed by Ordinance 28855 on November 30, 2010. The lock rule (§ 11.72.100) and the serial rule (§ 11.72.080) are what remain, and both are quoted above.
Takeaway
- 750 W is legal in California; the word is "exceed". Every machine here is 750 W or under.
- A trike is a bicycle (§ 231). No license, plate, registration or insurance (§ 24016(b)).
- Under 16: no class 3, and we may not sell you one (§ 21212.5). Under 18: helmet.
- Sidewalks are legal outside five named downtown blocks. Park trails: where posted, at 15 mph.
Where a bicycle gets hit
The City publishes every crash it recorded for the last five years, geocoded. Retrieved on September 16, 2026, the file holds 24,648 collisions from 2021 through 2025, and the count of bicycle-involved crashes depends on which of its three "bicycle" fields you read: 1,571 by collision type, 1,335 by "involved with", 1,611 by party category.
The union is 1,638, and that is the figure used here, with the spread published rather than the flattering limb.
Of those, 33 killed someone and 192 killed or severely injured someone. 1,306 of the 1,638, four in five, were at an intersection.
| When and where | Bicycle-involved crashes, 2021–2025 |
|---|---|
| 5 pm hour | 144 (the daily peak) |
| 3 pm and 6 pm hours | 136 each |
| 8 am hour | 123 |
| October | 183 (the monthly peak); September 166; November 162 |
| March | 95 (the monthly low) |
| In daylight | 1,145 (70%) |
| Dark, street lit | 367 (22%) |
| Dusk or dawn | 63 |
| Dark, no street light | 15 |
The neighborhood table carries each polygon's five-year bicycle crash count from the City's crash file and its rate per square mile per year, computed on the City's own polygons and the City's own crashes, so a reader can see where bicycles are hit and not have to infer it from a reputation. This axis is exposure, not character.
A neighborhood with many bicycle crashes is usually a neighborhood with many bicycles, an arterial, and a transit station; the table shows the count and the rate, and lets you decide the route.
Two things in that record are specifications. The evening peak lands in the same hours the season section put in the dark for a third of the year, which is the lighting rule again.
And four in five crashes are at intersections, which is where a machine's stopping and restarting happen: the brakes (§ 21201(a) requires one that "will enable the operator to make one braked wheel skid on dry, level, clean pavement"), the standover, and, for a rider who has not ridden in years, the third wheel that makes the restart a non-event.
The decision matrix
Every axis above is a row, and the matrix runs all of them at once, on the maker-published figures and the measured grades.
A situation is one ground: flat, rolling, hilly or steep, run at 2%, 4%, 8% and 13.75%, the last being the highest 90th-percentile grade among the steep fourteen. It is one riding history (rides now, or has not ridden in years), one rider weight (130 to 280 lb in six steps) and one height (5'0" to 6'4" in five).
And it is one load (solo, a child seat or groceries at 60 lb, cargo or two kids at 120 lb) and one place to keep the machine: a garage or ground floor, outside in a lower-theft ZIP, outside in a highest-quarter-theft ZIP, or up a flight of stairs.
That is 4 × 2 × 6 × 5 × 3 × 4 = 2,880 situations, every one in the matrix file behind this page with its outcome, available from us on request.
Fifteen adult machines run through each situation in a fixed order, on the maker figures and the measured grades, and a machine either clears a gate, fails it with a named reason, or is unconfirmed on it because the maker publishes nothing to test. The order is the logic of this whole guide:
- Riding history. Not ridden in years: three wheels only. Ten of the fifteen are eliminated here for that rider, by design.
- Payload. The maker's ceiling must cover your weight plus the load.
- Height. The maker's range must contain you. No range published: unconfirmed.
- Storage. Up a flight: 70 lb or under. Outside in a highest-quarter-theft ZIP: the maker must state the battery comes off. No weight or no statement: unconfirmed.
- Climb. The motor alone must hold 8 mph on the ground's test grade with you aboard, on the maker's published bike weight. No weight published: unconfirmed.
The 8 mph floor and the 70 lb line are this page's editorial thresholds, stated as such. Eight miles an hour is a brisk jog; below it a climb on the motor alone is a walk with a heavy bicycle.
| Outcome | Situations | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Resolved (at least one machine clears every gate) | 1,610 | 56% |
| Unconfirmed only (no machine eliminated outright, but every survivor has a limb the maker does not publish) | 930 | 32% |
| Unresolved (every machine eliminated by a named gate) | 340 | 12% |
The pattern inside those numbers is the page in miniature (2,880 rows, one per situation). For a rider who rides now, 1,064 of 1,440 situations resolve. For a rider who has not ridden in years, 546 do, and 694 more are held at unconfirmed on two of the five three-wheelers, the DWMEIGI MG1703 and MG2301, which carry no computed climb and, for the MG2301, no height fit (Limitations, items 1 and 2).
Those two are not eliminated anywhere; they are the machines the page cannot finish the arithmetic for, and it says so.
By ground: flat situations resolve 534 of 720, rolling 528, hilly 434, steep 114. By storage: a garage, a ground floor or a lower-theft ZIP resolves 527 of 720 each; a highest-quarter-theft ZIP 392, because only seven machines state a removable battery; a flight of stairs 164, because only five machines sit under 70 lb and none under 50.
How often each machine clears everything. Of 2,880 situations: FLASH LITE ST 900, Addmotor M-380 816, DWMEIGI MG708 Hera 552, Eunorau URUS 2.0 512, Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0 504, FLASH LITE 2.0 480, Addmotor Kunlun 468, Eunorau Defender 384, Qiolor TIGER RL 360, Eunorau MAX-CARGO 360, Addmotor Foldtan M-160 351, Eunorau META20 270, Eunorau META275 1.0 180.
The ST leads because it publishes the widest height range on the page and a 440 lb ceiling; the META275's 180 is the cost of a 5'6" floor and a 286 lb ceiling, on a bike that is otherwise the best value here. The M-380's 816 is a tandem trike qualifying as a solo machine on payload and wheels, which is true and which the cargo area puts in its place.
Read your own row
Three situations, read straight from the file:
| Rider | Flat | Rolling | Hilly | Steep |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has not ridden in years, 160 lb, 5'4", solo, garage | Hera $1,499 · ONE-TRIKE $1,799 · M-380 $4,099 | the same three | ONE-TRIKE · M-380 (the Hera holds 6.3 mph on 8%) | none computed: MG1703 and MG2301 unconfirmed, the rest under 8 mph |
| Same rider, bike kept outside in a highest-quarter-theft ZIP | Hera only (the ONE-TRIKE and M-380 do not state a removable battery) | Hera only | none resolved | none |
| Rides now, 250 lb, 6'0", child seat, up a flight, flat | unconfirmed only: nothing under 70 lb carries 310 lb; the two DWMEIGI trikes carry no computed climb (Limitations, item 1) | same | same | same |
And the grid every reader wants, for a solo rider who rides now, 5'8", garage storage: the number of machines that clear every gate.
| Ground (test grade) | 130 lb | 160 lb | 190 lb | 220 lb | 250 lb | 280 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat (2%) | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 9 |
| Rolling (4%) | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 8 |
| Hilly (8%) | 12 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Steep (13.75%) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
For the rider who has not ridden in years, same columns: flat 3 at every weight; rolling 3 to 280 lb where it drops to 2; hilly 2, then 1 from 190 lb, then 0 at 280; steep 0.
Where the matrix runs out
The 340 unresolved situations are named by the gate that closed them, and each gap is an instruction rather than a shrug.
The steep fourteen at 190 lb and over. No machine with a computed speed holds 8 mph on the motor alone up a 13.75% block with a 190 lb rider.
The actual speeds are published in full, motor alone with a 190 lb rider on the 13.75% test:
| Machine | Motor alone, 13.75% grade, 190 lb rider |
|---|---|
| Addmotor Kunlun | 7.9 mph |
| Eunorau FLASH LITE ST | 7.5 mph |
| Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0 | 7.5 mph |
| Addmotor Foldtan M-160 | 7.5 mph |
| Qiolor TIGER RL | 7.4 mph |
| Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0 | 7.3 mph |
| Addmotor M-380 | 6.1 mph |
| Eunorau URUS 2.0 | 5.5 mph |
| Eunorau META20 | 5.4 mph |
| Eunorau Defender | 5.4 mph |
| Eunorau META275 1.0 | 5.3 mph |
| Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0 | 5.0 mph |
| DWMEIGI MG708 Hera | 3.5 mph |
Add an easy pedal and every one of the 750 W machines crosses 8 mph; a rider in Suncrest, Mount Pleasant Foothills or East Foothills who wants the motor to do all of it is buying a walking-pace climb on the worst block, or choosing a route that avoids it. The MG1703 and Silverado HD sit in these rows as unconfirmed rather than placed; item 1 of the Limitations says why.
The 5'0" rider. Ninety-two situations close on height (the makers' own ranges). Two machines publish a floor at or under 5'0": the Hera at 4'11" and the FLASH LITE ST at 4'8".
A 5'0" rider who has ridden recently and lives on flat ground has the ST; one who has not ridden in years has the Hera; on hilly ground with no recent riding, nothing here is confirmed to fit, and the page says so.
The 6'4" rider. Twenty-eight situations. The Kunlun, both FLASH LITEs, the Defender, the URUS and the M-380 publish a ceiling of 6'4"; the trikes stop at 6'3" (MG1703), 6'2" (Hera) or 6'1" (ONE-TRIKE). A 6'4" rider who has not ridden in years has the M-380, and only the M-380.
Up a flight, with a load. A flight of stairs with a 60 lb child seat needs a machine under 70 lb whose ceiling covers rider plus 60. The five sub-70 lb machines top out at 300 lb, so a rider over 240 lb with a child aboard has no resolved row, and the honest advice is a ground-floor arrangement or a lock; the lighter bike does not exist.
Two wheels for a rider who has not ridden in years. 136 unresolved situations are simply that gate doing its job: the rider needs three wheels and the terrain, weight or height left no trike standing. Every one of those rows points at the three-wheel area and its limits.
Takeaway
- 2,880 situations, 1,610 resolved into a machine for you, and every gap named by the gate that closed it.
- The single most decisive row is riding history, then payload, then the 13.75% steep test.
- Two machines sit at "unconfirmed" across hundreds of rows; item 1 of the Limitations says why.
The best electric bike San Jose can buy, by what you are riding for
Eight areas, each with a distance and a frequency, each with budget, mid and upper tiers where the screen leaves enough machines to fill them, and each stating who should read another of our picks instead. Every price is our price on September 19, 2026, read from the store that morning; where a maker's own list price is higher, it is printed beside ours.
Seventeen machines from four makers were approved for this page across eight rides; every one clears California's § 312.5(a), is buyable on our store today, and was screened against the city-guide denylist before any area was drawn.
Area 1 — The flat commute
Maya Torres in a downtown separated bikeway at dusk: the § 21201(d) lights are on, and the shoulder check comes before the turn.
Your ride: 5 to 12 miles each way, five days a week, across the 237 flat neighborhoods where 81% of the city lives, on the 565.6 miles of bikeway measured below. What decides it for you: fit (the maker's height range and payload ceiling), then the rider's storage row. The hill does not.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Eunorau META275 1.0, $1,399 (maker's price $1,699) | a torque sensor and 68.4 lb, for riders 5'6" to 6'1" and under 266 lb loaded |
| Mid | Qiolor TIGER RL, $1,599 | 750 W, 85 N·m and a 400 lb ceiling, for riders up to 5'9" |
| Mid | Eunorau FLASH LITE ST, $1,899 | 4'8" to 6'4", 440 lb, a removable pack: the widest fit on the page |
| Upper | Addmotor Kunlun, $2,599 | 68 lb, 750 W and a fold, for the rider who also wants Area 4 |
Four picks, three brands. The META275 is the cheapest machine here with a torque sensor and it comes at $300 under the maker's own price, which is why it is the budget row despite a height range that starts at 5'6".
If you are shorter, the TIGER RL and the ST take over; if you are heavier than the META's 286 lb ceiling allows with a bag, the TIGER RL's 400 lb and the ST's 440 lb are the reason to spend more. Anyone whose commute crosses one of the 3,844 deciding blocks reads Area 2 first.
Area 2 — The foothill climb
A foothill block on the city's eastern edge: what your legs meet is the pitch of the steepest 30 meters, and the tables print it.
Your ride: 4 to 10 miles each way, home in one of the 37 hilly or steep neighborhoods, with at least one block over 8% on the way back. What decides it for you: motor-alone speed on the 8% test grade with your weight aboard, on the maker's published bike weight.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Qiolor TIGER RL, $1,599 | 9.7 mph up 8% at 250 lb on a 400 lb ceiling |
| Mid | Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0, $1,899 | 9.6 mph up 8% at 250 lb on a 440 lb ceiling |
| Upper | Addmotor Kunlun, $2,599 | 10.2 mph up 8% at 250 lb, the lightest 750 W machine here at 68 lb |
Three picks, three brands. The Kunlun climbs fastest because it is 24 lb lighter than the FLASH LITE 2.0 with the same rated motor; the FLASH LITE 2.0 carries 160 lb more ceiling and the torque figure.
The TIGER RL matches both on the hill and stops at 5'9" in the maker's range. On the steep test grade of 13.75% with a 190 lb rider all three fall under the 8 mph floor (7.4, 7.3 and 7.9 mph) and need your legs; on the 8% grade that defines hilly San Jose, all three clear it at every weight to 250 lb.
A rider over 6'3" is the Kunlun's or the FLASH LITE's; the URUS in Area 3 has 120 N·m for the rider who wants a mid-drive and will pay $3,999 for it.
Area 3 — The creek trails
A paved creek trail at the 15 mph ceiling § 13.44.100(C) sets.
Your ride: 10 to 30 miles on a weekend along the creek trails the City marks open, 105.5 paved miles of them, the Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek trails among them, at the 15 mph ceiling § 13.44.100(C) sets where nothing is posted. What decides it for you: tires and suspension for the unpaved reaches, then weight for the car.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Eunorau Defender, $1,599 | full suspension, fat tires, 66 lb, 300 lb ceiling |
| Mid | Addmotor Kunlun, $2,599 | fat tires, 68 lb, folds into a trunk |
| Upper | Eunorau URUS 2.0, $3,999 | 120 N·m mid-drive, 61.7 lb, full suspension |
Two brands across three picks, with Eunorau supplying two: the trail screen (fat or trail tires and suspension) leaves the Qiolor cruiser and the trikes out, and that shortfall is declared rather than padded. On a trail capped at 15 mph the 500 W Defender and URUS give away nothing to the 750 W bikes; what the URUS's $2,400 premium buys is torque at the crank and 4.3 lb less to lift onto a rack.
Anyone who wants the trail on three wheels reads Area 6: the MG1703 is the fat-tire trike.
Area 4 — Bike plus VTA, Caltrain or BART
The fold buys the platform; the maker's published weight decides whether it also buys the stairs at the far end.
Your ride: 2 to 5 miles at each end of a train, most days. What decides it for you: a fold, then weight. VTA admits six bicycles per light-rail car and Caltrain carries bikes aboard; BART allows a folded bike in every car at all times and an unfolded one in all but the first or a crowded car, and publishes its elevator dimensions for the larger machines. The transit section has the sentences.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Addmotor Foldtan M-160, $1,599 | folds, 750 W, 81.6 lb, removable pack |
| Mid | Eunorau META20, $1,699 | folds, 63.4 lb, the lightest folder here |
| Upper | Addmotor Kunlun, $2,599 | folds, 68 lb, 750 W for the hill at the far end |
Two brands across three picks, with Addmotor supplying two: only five machines on the page fold, and two of them are trikes. The META20 is the one to carry up a Caltrain step; the Foldtan and the Kunlun are the ones with 750 W for the climb home. None of the transit pages we read mentions tricycles either way, so a trike on the train is not confirmed here in either direction.
Area 5 — The school run and the cargo trip
The 120 lb load level: a child seat and the week's groceries, added to your weight before the climb is computed.
Your ride: 2 to 6 miles, twice a day, with 60 to 120 lb aboard. What decides it for you: the maker's payload ceiling minus you, then a seat that meets § 21204(b) for a passenger of four or under or 40 lb or less.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0, $1,699 | 440 lb ceiling, 750 W, 85 lb |
| Mid | Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0, $1,799 | 440 lb ceiling on three wheels, folds |
| Mid | DWMEIGI MG2301 Silverado HD, $2,899 | 330 lb, reverse gear, parking brake, folds |
| Upper | Addmotor M-380 tandem, $4,099 | 550 lb, two adults, 750 W |
Four picks, three brands. The MAX-CARGO is the two-wheel answer: 440 lb on the maker's ceiling for $1,699, on a long-tail deck built to take the child seat that § 21204(b) requires for a passenger of four or under; the seat is an accessory.
The ONE-TRIKE carries the same ceiling standing still; the MG2301 adds a reverse gear for backing out of a garage with a load; the M-380 is the machine for two adults, or one adult and a passenger who cannot pedal.
Area 6 — Three wheels
One foot down, nothing to hold up: the third wheel removes the balance moment.
Your ride: any of the above, for a rider who has not been on a bicycle in years, or who wants to put both feet down and have nothing to hold up. What decides it for you: the ground first, because the trike's motor is doing the climbing while the rider is still learning it; then the parking brake and the reverse gear that make mounting, dismounting and backing out of a driveway into non-events.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | DWMEIGI MG708 Hera, $1,499 | 350 W, 15 mph, 88 lb, parking brake, 4'11" to 6'2"; holds 8.2 mph on a 4% block at 250 lb |
| Mid | Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0, $1,799 | 500 W, 80 N·m, 440 lb; 8.0 mph on 8% at 190 lb |
| Mid | DWMEIGI MG1703, $1,999 | 750 W, 20 mph, 330 lb, fat tires, removable pack; no computed climb (Limitations, item 1) |
| Upper | Addmotor M-380 tandem, $4,099 | 750 W, 550 lb, parking brake, 5'2" to 6'4" |
Four picks, three brands. The Hera is the flat-city trike: at 350 W and 15 mph it is the machine the matrix hands to a rider who last rode twenty years ago, on any of the 237 flat neighborhoods and most of the rolling ones.
Its owners are plain that it takes a while to be comfortable, which is the point, and also why the first rides belong in an empty lot. It arrives in two sections that mate at the middle; budget an hour with a second pair of hands, or ask us about assembly before it ships.
On hilly ground the ONE-TRIKE's 500 W is the floor; on steep ground the 750 W MG1703 and Silverado HD are the only three-wheelers rated for it, and this page carries no computed climb for them (Limitations, item 1). The MG1703 drives one rear wheel, so take the first braking practice in the same empty lot as the first corners.
The maker's cornering instruction quoted above rides with every one of these, and Eunorau adds, of the ONE-TRIKE, that "it is an electric trike—not a medical mobility device."
Area 7 — Kids
Under 18, a helmet on any bicycle (§ 21212); under 16, class 2 or lower.
Your ride: a child's, on the sidewalk outside the five downtown blocks, in a park where riding is posted, with a helmet under § 21212. What decides it for you: the maker's height range, and § 21212.5, which lets us sell a child under 16 a class 2 or lower machine and nothing faster.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Eunorau EKIDS20, $899 | 250 W, 15.5 mph cap, 37.4 lb, riders 3'5" to 5'0" |
| Mid | Eunorau EKIDS24, $899 | 250 W, 15.5 mph cap, 44.1 lb, riders 3'5" to 5'5" |
One brand, two sizes, and no upper tier: only Eunorau on our shelf builds an electric bike sized for a child, so the spread rule is waived here on that screen and stated. The 200 lb ceiling and the 5'5" top of the range are the two numbers that decide which size, and both are the maker's.
Area 8 — The bike that comes indoors
The 70 lb two-person line is where a flight of stairs decides the bike.
Your ride: anything, for a rider in a highest-quarter-theft ZIP who cannot leave the machine outside and has a flight of stairs between the door and the closet. What decides it for you: the maker's published weight, over everything.
| Tier | Pick | The deciding figure |
|---|---|---|
| Budget | Eunorau META275 1.0, $1,399 | 68.4 lb |
| Mid | Addmotor Kunlun, $2,599 | 68 lb, and a fold that fits a closet |
| Upper | Eunorau URUS 2.0, $3,999 | 61.7 lb, the lightest adult machine here, removable pack |
Two brands across three picks: the 70 lb screen leaves five machines and four of them are Eunorau's, which is declared. Nothing here is a one-person carry under 50 lb. If the stairs are yours alone, the META20 at 63.4 lb folds and the Kunlun folds; the URUS and the FLASH LITE ST state a removable pack, so the battery comes up the stairs and the frame stays locked to the railing.
The machine that clears the most San Jose situations, 900 of 2,880: a 4'8" to 6'4" range, a 440 lb ceiling, a removable pack for the highest-theft ZIPs, and 9.9 mph up an 8% block with a 250 lb rider. Free shipping in the lower 48, US warranty support, Shop Pay installments at checkout.
FLASH LITE ST to cart — $1,899The seventeen machines in full
Every figure below is the maker's own published specification, re-read on September 19, 2026, and every price is ours on that day. Where the maker's list price is higher than ours, both are shown.
Eunorau FLASH LITE ST
$1,899The machine that fits the most San Jose riders. The maker's product page publishes the widest rider-height range on this page, 4'8" to 6'4", a 440 lb total payload ceiling, a maker-published 82 lb and a battery that comes off the frame.
It is a 750 W rear hub with 92 N·m, a 52V 16Ah pack, hydraulic disc brakes, a thumb throttle and a UL-certified system, shipped as a class 2 at 20 mph.
On the hill: 14.0 mph up an 8% block with a 130 lb rider, 9.9 mph with a 250 lb rider, motor alone. What decides it for you: the fit range and the ceiling. It is the only two-wheeler here a 5'0" rider and a 6'4" rider can both buy on the maker's own numbers.
Who should buy something else: if you carry it up a flight (82 lb is past this page's two-person line), read the META20; if your ride is mostly the steep fourteen, read the Kunlun; if a low mount is the point, the Hera starts at 4'11" with a parking brake.
Ivory or Midnight Black; free shipping in the lower 48, US warranty support and Shop Pay installments at checkout. Our own review of the FLASH LITE ST covers it in full.
Eunorau META275 1.0
$1,399 (maker's price $1,699)The cheapest torque-sensor bike on the page, at $300 under the maker's own price. Eunorau's product page publishes a torque sensor, 500 W, 55 N·m, a 48V 15Ah pack, hydraulic brakes, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 68.4 lb, a 286 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'6" to 6'1".
On the hill: 10.6 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 7.0 mph at 250 lb. What decides it for you: the sensor and the weight. The sensor makes the assist follow your legs instead of your cadence, which is the difference on a 4% block from a standing start; the weight is what you lift onto a rack or up two steps.
Who should buy something else: you, if you are outside 5'6" to 6'1" on the maker's range (the TIGER RL stops at 5'9" and starts at 5'1"; the FLASH LITE ST runs 4'8" to 6'4").
If you are over 266 lb with a bag, on the 286 lb ceiling, or you ride the hilly 23 or steep 14, where 500 W and a 250 lb rider drop under 8 mph at 8%, read the FLASH LITE 2.0. Black or Gray; US warranty support and free shipping.
Our own review of the META275 1.0 covers it in full.
Qiolor TIGER RL
$1,599The heavy rider's commuter for anyone up to 5'9". Qiolor's product page publishes 750 W, 85 N·m, a 48V 13Ah removable pack, hydraulic disc brakes, 20×4.0 tires, a maker-published 87 lb, a 400 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'1" to 5'9", as a class 2 at 20 mph.
On the hill: 13.8 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 9.7 mph at 250 lb. What decides it for you: the ceiling and the torque. A 280 lb rider with a 60 lb load still has 60 lb of headroom here, which the META range cannot offer.
Who should buy something else: if you are over 5'9" on the maker's own range, read the FLASH LITE 2.0; if you must carry it indoors, read Area 8. Orange or white; free shipping, US support, Shop Pay at checkout.
Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0
$1,899The 750 W climber with the ceiling to carry a load up Alum Rock. Eunorau's product page publishes 750 W, 92 N·m, a 52V 16Ah pack with a second and third optional, hydraulic disc brakes, 20×4 tires, a UL-certified system, a weight the maker gives as "82–92 lbs" (this page computes on 92 lb), a 440 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'4".
Shipped as a class 2 at 20 mph; the maker calls it "Class 2 Speed limited, Unlockable", and a rider who changes that has changed the class and the age floor.
On the hill: 13.6 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 9.6 mph at 250 lb; 7.3 mph on the 13.75% steep test with a 190 lb rider, motor alone. What decides it for you: the battery bays.
It is the only two-wheeler here whose maker sells a second and a third pack for it (the maker's page: "riders can add a second or a third battery"), which is what a foothill commute at full assist consumes; on one pack the lighter ST climbs the same block a shade faster, 9.9 against 9.6 mph at 250 lb.
Who should buy something else: if you are under 5'2", the ST; if you want the same climb 24 lb lighter and folding, the Kunlun; if you have not ridden in years, Area 6. Moon Black or Lunar Dust; free shipping and US warranty support. Our own review of the FLASH LITE 2.0 covers it in full.
Addmotor Kunlun
$2,599The fastest climber on the page because it is the lightest 750 W frame on it. Addmotor's product page publishes a maker-published 68 lb, a 280 lb ceiling, fat tires, a folding frame and a rider range of 5'4" to 6'4", and, in the page's own words, "a powerful 750-watt rear-mounted hub motor".
On the hill: 14.7 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 10.2 mph at 250 lb, 7.9 mph on the 13.75% steep test at 190 lb: the best motor-alone figures of any machine here. What decides it for you: 68 lb. Twenty-four pounds lighter than the FLASH LITE 2.0 with the same rated motor, and it folds into a trunk or a ground-floor closet.
Who should buy something else: if you are over 260 lb with a bag, on the 280 lb ceiling, read the FLASH LITE 2.0 or the TIGER RL; if you are under 5'4", read the ST. Free shipping in the lower 48, US support, Shop Pay installments.
Eunorau Defender
$1,599The trail bike that also clears the two-person stairs line. Eunorau's product page publishes 500 W, a 48V 15Ah pack, full suspension, fat tires, hydraulic disc brakes, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 66 lb, a 300 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'3" to 6'4".
On the trail: at the 15 mph ceiling San Jose posts on its park paths, 500 W gives away nothing. On the hill: 10.7 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 7.1 mph at 250 lb. What decides it for you: suspension and tires for the unpaved reaches, and a weight that lifts onto a car rack.
An owner on the maker's page calls it "the quietest bike I have ever ridden"; another, older, chose it for the step-through "as an older person it's hard for me to swing my leg over the saddle."
Who should buy something else: if you ride the hilly 23 at over 220 lb, read the 750 W picks in Area 2; if you want a mid-drive, read the URUS. Army Green in 17" or 19", or Safari in 19"; free shipping and US warranty support. Our own review of the Defender covers it in full.
Eunorau URUS 2.0
$3,999The lightest adult machine on the page and the most torque at the crank. Eunorau's product page publishes a 500 W mid-drive with 120 N·m, a torque sensor, a 48V 17.5Ah removable pack in a lockable case, four-piston hydraulic brakes, full suspension, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 61.7 lb, a 300 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'3" to 6'4"; front and rear lights are listed as not included, so add a § 21201(d) set before the first dark ride.
The maker labels it a class 3 with the assist speed limited to 20 mph as shipped; on § 312.5(a)'s own limbs a 20 mph throttle machine is a class 2, and this page rides it as the label says: a helmet at every age and no operator under 16.
On the hill: 10.8 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 7.2 mph at 250 lb on the motor alone; with a torque sensor and 120 N·m, this is the machine where your own legs count for the most. What decides it: the weight and the sensor, for a rider who climbs and carries.
Who should buy something else: if you want the motor to do all of a steep climb, read the 750 W hub bikes in Area 2; if you are over 280 lb loaded, read the FLASH LITE 2.0. Cloud White in 17" or 19" is what is buyable today. Free shipping, US support, Shop Pay installments.
Addmotor Foldtan M-160
$1,599 (Addmotor's list price $2,099)The budget folder for the train and the far-end hill. Addmotor lists it at $2,099 and sells it at $1,599 today, the same $1,599 you pay here. Addmotor's product page publishes 750 W, a torque sensor, a 48V 20Ah removable pack, hydraulic disc brakes, a folding frame, a maker-published 81.6 lb, a 280 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'3".
On the hill: 14.0 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 9.9 mph at 250 lb. What decides it for you: the fold and the motor together, for a rider whose last two miles from Caltrain climb.
Who should buy something else: if you carry it up a flight (81.6 lb), read the META20; if you are over 260 lb loaded, read the FLASH LITE 2.0. Sky Blue, Olive Green, Red, Yellow or White; free shipping and US support.
Eunorau META20
$1,699The folder you carry up the Caltrain step and the apartment stairs. Eunorau's product page publishes 500 W, 55 N·m, a torque sensor, a 48V 15Ah pack, hydraulic brakes, a folding frame, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 63.4 lb, a 286 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'1" to 6'1".
On the hill: 10.8 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 7.1 mph at 250 lb. What decides it for you: 63.4 lb and the fold, which put it under this page's two-person line and inside a closet.
Who should buy something else: if your far-end ride climbs the hilly 23 at over 220 lb, read the Foldtan or the Kunlun. Alpine White, Steel Blue, Pastel Pink, Deep Crimson or Dark Charcoal; free shipping in the lower 48, US warranty support. Our own review of the META20 covers it in full.
Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0
$1,699The school run and the grocery trip, on two wheels. Eunorau's product page publishes 750 W, 70 N·m, a 48V 14Ah pack with a second optional, hydraulic disc brakes, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 85 lb, a 440 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'1".
Shipped at 20 mph with a twist throttle, which is § 312.5(a)'s class 2 limb; the maker labels it class 3, and this page rides it as the label says: no operator under 16, and a helmet on the rider and on every passenger, a child in the seat included.
On the hill: 13.9 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 9.8 mph at 250 lb, with 120 lb of cargo still inside the ceiling for a 250 lb rider. What decides it for you: the ceiling.
An owner in a hilly city: "Now I can go to the store and get groceries with ease."
A passenger of four or under, or 40 lb or less, rides in a seat that retains them (§ 21204(b)).
Who should buy something else: if you are over 6'1" on the maker's range, or you want the load to stand still at the curb, read the ONE-TRIKE. Green or White; free shipping, US support, Shop Pay installments. Our own review of the MAX-CARGO 2.0 covers it in full.
Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0
$1,799The three-wheeler for hilly ground and a real load. Eunorau's product page publishes a 500 W rear drive with 80 N·m, a 48V 14.5Ah pack, hydraulic disc brakes, a folding frame, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 85.98 lb, a 440 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'1".
On the hill: 9.9 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 8.0 mph at 190 lb, 6.7 mph at 250 lb on the motor alone; with the matrix's 20 lb solo kit aboard, the 190 lb row drops to 7.5 mph, which is why that row hands the returning rider the M-380. What decides it for you: three wheels with a computed climb.
It is the trike the matrix hands to a returning rider in the hilly 23, because the Hera drops under the floor there and the 750 W trikes carry no computable speed.
Who should buy something else: if you are a returning rider on flat ground who wants the lowest mount and the parking brake, read the Hera; if you are over 6'1", read the M-380. Our own review of the ONE-TRIKE 2.0 covers it in full.
The maker's cornering instruction quoted in the experience section rides with it. Deep Crimson, Dark Charcoal or Snow White; free shipping and US support.
DWMEIGI MG708 Hera
$1,499The machine the matrix hands to a rider who last rode twenty years ago. DWMEIGI's product page publishes a 350 W front hub, 15 mph, a 36V 13Ah removable pack, a parking brake, 24×2.4 tires, a maker-published 88 lb, a 300 lb ceiling and a rider range of 4'11" to 6'2".
On the hill: 11.4 mph up a 4% block at 130 lb and 8.2 mph at 250 lb; 7.1 and 4.7 mph on 8%. What decides it for you: it stands up at every stop, the parking brake holds it while you get on and off, and 15 mph is the ceiling San Jose posts on its park paths anyway.
Its owners are candid, one of them translated from French: "It does not ride like a bike. It takes a while to be comfortable", and "It is not hard to assemble, I am 72 and the hardest part was the mating of the front and rear sections." Budget an hour of assembly with a second pair of hands, or ask us about assembly before it ships, and take the first rides in an empty lot.
Who should buy something else: if you are a returning rider in the hilly 23, read the ONE-TRIKE; if you are over 6'2", read the MG1703 or the M-380. Red or Blue; free shipping in the lower 48, US warranty support, Shop Pay at checkout.
DWMEIGI MG1703
$1,999Three wheels, 750 W and fat tires, for the returning rider who wants the trail or the hill. DWMEIGI's product page publishes 750 W, 20 mph, a 48V 18.2Ah detachable pack, a 330 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'3". This page computes no climb speed for it; its place rests on the maker's published motor, ceiling and height range, and item 1 of the Limitations records why.
What decides it for you: the motor rating, the ceiling and the removable pack, on three wheels. An owner on the maker's page: "this trike is sweet!" and "Rides nice and useful for transportation around town." Two notes ride with it: the drive is on one rear wheel, so take the first braking practice in an empty lot; and it is a 750 W machine built to be ridden with its assist on.
The replacement pack is a part we stock.
Who should buy something else: if you want a computed climb figure, read the ONE-TRIKE; if you are on flat ground and want the lowest mount, read the Hera. Black or White; free shipping, US support, Shop Pay installments.
DWMEIGI MG2301 Silverado HD
$2,899The trike that backs out of the garage on its own. DWMEIGI's product page publishes 750 W, 20 mph, a 48V 14Ah removable pack, a reverse gear, a parking brake, a lockable hydraulic suspension fork, 20×4 fat tires, a folding frame and a 330 lb ceiling.
This page computes no climb for it and claims no height fit; it sits in the matrix as unconfirmed on both rows, never as a fit, and items 1 and 2 of the Limitations record why.
What decides it for you: the reverse gear and the parking brake, which turn the two hardest moments for a returning rider, backing out and getting on, into buttons.
Who should buy something else: if you are over 6'2" and want a height figure to check against, read the MG1703 (5'2" to 6'3"); if you want the lowest mount, read the Hera (4'11" to 6'2"). Green or Blue; free shipping in the lower 48 and US warranty support.
Addmotor M-380 Tandem eTrike
$4,099 (dual battery $4,699)The only machine on the page built for two adults. Addmotor's product page publishes 750 W, a 48V 20Ah pack (a second in the dual-battery version), a torque sensor, a parking brake, Tektro mechanical brakes, a UL 2271 battery, a maker-published 147 lb, a 550 lb ceiling and a rider range of 5'2" to 6'4".
On the hill: 11.5 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 8.4 mph at 250 lb, on the motor alone, and the 550 lb ceiling means those figures hold with a second adult aboard at the right weights. What decides it: a passenger who cannot pedal, or a couple who ride together and one of whom has not ridden in years.
Who should buy something else: if you ride solo, a 147 lb machine is answering a question you did not ask: read the ONE-TRIKE or the Hera. Single or dual battery; free shipping, US support, Shop Pay installments. Our own review of the M-380 covers it in full.
Eunorau EKIDS20
$899The child's first electric bike, with the speed set on the handlebar. Eunorau's product page publishes 250 W, three handlebar speed limits at 7.5, 11 and 15.5 mph, a cadence sensor, a 24V 10Ah pack, 20×1.95 tires, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 37.4 lb, a 200 lb ceiling and a rider range of 3'5" to 5'0".
Class 2 or lower at every setting, which is what § 21212.5 lets us sell to a rider under 16; a helmet at every age under 18 (§ 21212).
What decides it for you: the three limits. A parent sets 7.5 mph on the first day and 15.5 on the day it is earned. An owner on the maker's page praised the responsive support.
Who should buy something else: if your child is over 5'0", read the EKIDS24. Graphite or Cloud White; free shipping in the lower 48 and US warranty support. Our own review of the EKIDS20 covers it in full.
Eunorau EKIDS24
$899The same machine one wheel size up. Eunorau's product page publishes 250 W, the same three handlebar limits at 7.5, 11 and 15.5 mph, a cadence sensor, a 24V 10Ah pack, 24×1.95 tires, a UL-certified system, a maker-published 44.1 lb, a 200 lb ceiling and a rider range of 3'5" to 5'5".
What decides it for you: the 5'5" top of the range, which carries a child through the years the 20-inch does not. An owner filmed "Elliott's first hill climbs" on it; that is the use.
Who should buy something else: if your rider is over 5'5" or 200 lb, they have outgrown the kids' area: read Area 1, where the ST starts at 4'8". Cloud White or Obsidian; free shipping and US support. Our own review of the EKIDS24 covers it in full.
If you have not been on a bicycle in years, this is the machine that stands up on its own at every stop. 4'11" and up, 300 lb, a parking brake, and the 15 mph the park paths post anyway. Free shipping, US warranty support, Shop Pay installments at checkout.
Buy the Hera — $1,499Height, standover and what the makers actually publish
No maker on this slate publishes a standover height, so this page does not print one. What every maker but one publishes is a recommended rider-height range, and it is the fit constraint a buyer can check with a tape measure. The matrix treats the range as a gate: a machine qualifies for you only if the maker's own range contains you.
| Machine | Maker's rider-height range | Maker's payload ceiling | Maker's bike weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eunorau FLASH LITE ST | 4'8" to 6'4" | 440 lb | 82 lb |
| DWMEIGI MG708 Hera | 4'11" to 6'2" | 300 lb | 88 lb |
| Eunorau META20 | 5'1" to 6'1" | 286 lb | 63.4 lb |
| Qiolor TIGER RL | 5'1" to 5'9" | 400 lb | 87 lb |
| Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0 | 5'2" to 6'4" | 440 lb | 92 lb (maker: "82–92 lbs") |
| Addmotor Foldtan M-160 | 5'2" to 6'3" | 280 lb | 81.6 lb |
| Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0 | 5'2" to 6'1" | 440 lb | 85 lb |
| Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0 | 5'2" to 6'1" | 440 lb | 85.98 lb |
| DWMEIGI MG1703 | 5'2" to 6'3" | 330 lb | not published |
| Addmotor M-380 tandem | 5'2" to 6'4" | 550 lb | 147 lb |
| Eunorau Defender | 5'3" to 6'4" | 300 lb | 66 lb |
| Eunorau URUS 2.0 | 5'3" to 6'4" | 300 lb | 61.7 lb |
| Addmotor Kunlun | 5'4" to 6'4" | 280 lb | 68 lb |
| Eunorau META275 1.0 | 5'6" to 6'1" | 286 lb | 68.4 lb |
| DWMEIGI MG2301 Silverado HD | not published | 330 lb | not published |
| Eunorau EKIDS20 | 3'5" to 5'0" | 200 lb | 37.4 lb |
| Eunorau EKIDS24 | 3'5" to 5'5" | 200 lb | 44.1 lb |
Three figures in that table decide more situations than any hill. At 5'0", two adult machines fit on the makers' own numbers and at 5'1" four do; at 6'4", six do; and the DWMEIGI Silverado HD, which publishes no range, is never claimed to fit anyone.
Where two representations of the same maker disagree, the product page's current figure is used and the other is noted: DWMEIGI's blog gives the Hera 5'1" to 6'1" and its product page 4'11" to 6'2"; the page's range is carried.
Range, on San Jose's hills and in its heat
Every range on a maker's page is an "up to" figure at the lightest assist on flat ground, and every one of them shrinks with the rider's weight and the grade for the same reason the speed table shrinks: the battery is lifting rider plus bike. This page does not compute a range, because no maker publishes the assist-level power draw a range computation needs.
What it publishes is the pack, in watt-hours, from the maker's own voltage and amp-hours, and the maker's range sentence where the maker wrote one.
| Machine | Pack (maker's V × Ah) | Watt-hours | The maker's range sentence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addmotor Foldtan M-160 | 48V 20Ah | 960 | not quoted here |
| Addmotor Kunlun | 20Ah (the page names a 20Ah Samsung UL-certified battery and a 48 V charger) | 960 at 48 V | not quoted here (script-rendered table) |
| Addmotor M-380 tandem | 48V 20Ah (second optional) | 960 | not quoted here |
| DWMEIGI MG1703 | 48V 18.2Ah | 874 | "up to 45 miles per charge (pure electric mode), will be longer on PAS mode (60 miles)" |
| Eunorau URUS 2.0 | 48V 17.5Ah | 840 | "Up to 40–65 Miles" |
| Eunorau FLASH LITE 2.0 | 52V 16Ah (second and third optional) | 832 | "Up to 65 Miles" on one pack; the maker quotes 135 with two and 220 with three |
| Eunorau FLASH LITE ST | 52V 16Ah | 832 | not quoted here |
| Eunorau META275 1.0 | 48V 15Ah | 720 | not quoted here |
| Eunorau META20 | 48V 15Ah | 720 | not quoted here |
| Eunorau Defender | 48V 15Ah | 720 | not quoted here |
| Eunorau ONE-TRIKE 2.0 | 48V 14.5Ah | 696 | not quoted here |
| DWMEIGI MG2301 Silverado HD | 48V 14Ah | 672 | "35-55Miles Range" |
| Eunorau MAX-CARGO 2.0 | 48V 14Ah (second optional) | 672 | "Up to 80 Miles (Dual Battery)" |
| Qiolor TIGER RL | 48V 13Ah | 624 | not quoted here |
| DWMEIGI MG708 Hera | 36V 13Ah | 468 | "25 miles (E-Bike Mode) to 35 miles (Assisted Mode)" |
| Eunorau EKIDS20 / EKIDS24 | 24V 10Ah | 240 | not quoted here |
The practical reading for San Jose: on the flat 237 a 700 Wh pack covers a 12-mile commute each way with margin for any rider on this page; in the steep fourteen, where the motor is working against gravity for a 280 lb rider at 8.9 mph, the same pack does not, and the second battery Eunorau sells for the FLASH LITE and MAX-CARGO is the answer to a hill.
Heat does not shorten a ride in this city so much as it dictates where the pack sleeps: indoors, per the manual's charging window, on the nineteen days a year over 90 °F.
Every San Jose neighborhood, measured
The set is the City of San Jose's own "Neighborhoods" layer (297 polygons, catalog modified September 11, 2026, retrieved September 16), built by the City from census block groups with the Council offices, which is why it is a true partition: 0.00 square miles of overlap. Two names, Commercial and Guadalupe, appear on two polygons each; their blocks and residents are pooled into one row apiece, so the tables carry 295 rows for 297 polygons.
Measured against the Census Bureau's 2025 gazetteer, the polygons cover 89.07% of the city's land; the 19.75 square miles they do not cover hold zero block-group population, with 86% of that ground in a single council district and 30% of it inside park boundaries; and 25 polygons sit mostly outside the city line, which is why the rows sum to 1,054,829 residents against 978,216 whose block group sits inside the city line.
Each row: residents from the City's block-group join (ACS 2022, independently re-checked against ACS 2023 for all 633 block groups); the 90th-percentile block grade; the steepest named block and its pitch after the holds; bicycle-involved crashes 2021–2025 from the City's crash file; and the theft band of the ZIP the neighborhood mostly lies in.
The last column is how many of the thirteen machines with a computed speed hold 8 mph for a 190 lb rider on that 90th-percentile grade, motor alone.
Steep San Jose: 14 neighborhoods, 38,815 residents
| Neighborhood | Residents | 90th-pct grade | Steepest named block (pitch) | Bicycle crashes 2021–25 | Theft ZIP band | Machines holding 8 mph at 190 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suncrest | 1,550 | 13.75% | Lochinvar Way (21.2%) | 5 | lowest | 0 of 13 |
| Mount Pleasant Foothills | 1,805 | 13.40% | Higuera Highland Ln (23.4%) | 0 | lowest | 1 of 13 |
| East Foothills | 4,699 | 12.70% | Merkley Row (25.5%) | 0 | second | 3 of 13 |
| Los Alamitos Creek | 2,064 | 10.86% | Serene Way (23.7%) | 2 | lowest | 6 of 13 |
| Sierra Vista Hills | 2,154 | 10.48% | Canyon View Dr (17.8%) | 1 | lowest | 6 of 13 |
| Warner Heights | 1,109 | 10.17% | Story Ln (21.3%) | 0 | second | 7 of 13 |
| Coyote and Senter | 3,129 | 9.87% | Snow Dr (18.2%) | 2 | lowest | 7 of 13 |
| Noble | 1,191 | 8.85% | Whitman Way (17.8%) | 2 | lowest | 8 of 13 |
| Almaden Country Club | 1,458 | 8.82% | Rimrock Dr (17.4%) | 0 | lowest | 8 of 13 |
| Quicksilver | 2,531 | 8.73% | Almaden Quicksilver Park (23.9%) | 0 | lowest | 9 of 13 |
| Communications Hill | 8,493 | 8.67% | Carol Dr (19.2%) | 18 | second | 10 of 13 |
| Evergreen Valley High | 5,007 | 8.49% | Chaboya Hills Ct (20.3%) | 5 | lowest | 11 of 13 |
| Santa Teresa Hills | 1,002 | 8.49% | Cinnabar Hills Rd (22.4%) | 1 | lowest | 11 of 13 |
| Almaden Guadalupe Park | 2,623 | 8.27% | Lookout Bend (15.8%) | 0 | lowest | 11 of 13 |
Hilly San Jose: 23 neighborhoods, 86,140 residents
| Neighborhood | Residents | 90th-pct grade | Steepest named block (pitch) | Bicycle crashes 2021–25 | Theft ZIP band | Machines holding 8 mph at 190 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Creek Country Club | 8,026 | 7.77% | M Rd (18.1%) | 4 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Cureton and Joseph George | 3,423 | 7.51% | Watters Ct (20.7%) | 1 | second | 12 of 13 |
| Williams | 2,193 | 7.24% | Echo Ridge Dr (16.3%) | 1 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| The Villages | 2,296 | 7.16% | Heartland Way (13.9%) | 0 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| San Jose Country Club | 2,720 | 6.94% | Canyon Dr (20.9%) | 0 | second | 12 of 13 |
| Stripe Elementary and Great Oaks | 2,006 | 6.70% | Blom Dr (14.6%) | 2 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Calico Creek | 1,735 | 6.55% | Columbine Dr (12.9%) | 2 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Guadalupe | 5,464 | 6.45% | Camino Robles Ct (16.0%) | 1 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Valley Christian | 3,523 | 6.27% | Knightshaven Way (16.9%) | 8 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Villages | 2,394 | 6.05% | Village View Dr (12.9%) | 0 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Canoas Garden and Almaden | 2,290 | 6.01% | Sands Dr (16.9%) | 8 | highest | 12 of 13 |
| Norwood | 11,899 | 5.99% | San Saba Dr (16.3%) | 11 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Linda Vista and Hillcrest | 1,592 | 5.71% | Fairway Dr (11.7%) | 1 | second | 12 of 13 |
| Shady Oaks and Basking Ridge | 6,384 | 5.54% | Fontanoso Rd (16.9%) | 2 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Meadowlands | 1,303 | 5.35% | High Meadow Ct (8.0%) | 0 | lowest | 12 of 13 |
| Fowler Creek | 6,567 | 4.52% | Lazy Ln (21.3%) | 8 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Union | 2,379 | 4.41% | Craig Way (13.5%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Silver Creek High School | 4,870 | 4.36% | Chisin St (13.8%) | 8 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Berryessa Creek | 1,300 | 4.31% | Bloomsbury Way (9.8%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Cadwallader | 7,341 | 4.15% | Pacific Rim Ln (14.8%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Piedmont | 1,074 | 4.15% | Hostetter Rd (6.9%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Almaden Meadows | 1,193 | 4.08% | Corte De Maria (14.0%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Chaboya | 4,168 | 4.02% | Delta Rd (7.5%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
Rolling San Jose: 21 neighborhoods, 74,630 residents
| Neighborhood | Residents | 90th-pct grade | Steepest named block (pitch) | Bicycle crashes 2021–25 | Theft ZIP band | Machines holding 8 mph at 190 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McKean | 1,884 | 3.99% | Valentine Ct (11.9%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Estates | 3,725 | 3.87% | Ashley Way (9.0%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Guadalupe Oak Grove | 2,706 | 3.77% | Kyburz Pl (15.4%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Almaden Lake | 1,983 | 3.74% | Old Quarry Rd (10.4%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Valle Vista | 2,893 | 3.73% | Chapala Dr (15.3%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Boeger and Fernish Park | 3,804 | 3.63% | Guluzzo Dr (5.8%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Castillero and Simonds | 1,593 | 3.53% | Golf Creek Dr (12.2%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Sierramont | 857 | 3.38% | Kimlee Dr (3.8%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Quimby Oak | 6,556 | 3.34% | Heritage Estates Ct (9.7%) | 3 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Coyote Creek | 1,640 | 3.15% | Valley Oak Dr (19.8%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Belwood-Belgatos | 4,737 | 2.97% | Vista Loop (15.1%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| La Pala | 1,731 | 2.97% | Madeline Dr (5.2%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Singer Park | 1,646 | 2.79% | Casterwood Ct (6.0%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Gramercy and Alexander | 3,331 | 2.77% | Madden Ave (4.8%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Mount Pleasant | 4,432 | 2.57% | Harvest Dr (5.3%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Majestic | 5,419 | 2.23% | Stephanie Ct (4.8%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Park Pleasant and Mount Pleasant | 3,884 | 2.22% | Hickerson Dr (3.7%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Almaden Winery | 2,474 | 2.20% | Juarceys Ct (9.1%) | 4 | third | 13 of 13 |
| North Berryessa | 10,025 | 2.13% | Landess Ave (8.3%) | 5 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| John Vianney | 4,662 | 2.02% | Hyland Ave (4.7%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Graystone | 4,648 | 2.00% | Kindra Hill Dr (14.4%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
Flat San Jose: 237 neighborhoods, 855,244 residents
On flat ground the terrain column stops deciding; read the crash count, the theft band and the rider rows. Thirty-nine of these 237 still hold at least one block over 3.5%, listed in the block table below.
| Neighborhood | Residents | 90th-pct grade | Steepest named block (pitch) | Bicycle crashes 2021–25 | Theft ZIP band | Machines holding 8 mph at 190 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Colina | 4,378 | 1.96% | Valroy Dr (15.0%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Trinidad | 2,969 | 1.95% | Old Oak Dr (7.3%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| East Hills and White | 6,797 | 1.84% | Victoria Ct (5.8%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Los Alamitos | 2,237 | 1.81% | Desert Flame Dr (5.5%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Penitencia Creek | 7,806 | 1.81% | Courtyard Berryessa CND Access (6.1%) | 11 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Noddin and Leigh | 1,250 | 1.74% | Del Oro Dr (5.2%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Steinbeck and Allen | 3,551 | 1.72% | Hedlund Pl (16.3%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Piedmont Hills and St Victor | 4,670 | 1.69% | Rockport Ave (5.5%) | 3 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| James Lick and Pleasant Ridge | 1,123 | 1.68% | Pala Ave (3.4%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Lyndale | 5,085 | 1.67% | Colonade Sq (3.6%) | 14 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Kolmar and Ryan | 2,030 | 1.65% | Murtha Dr (3.8%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Gimelli-Delano Manongs | 1,640 | 1.64% | Gimelli Pl (4.8%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Lone Hill | 4,551 | 1.63% | Dalton Pl (7.2%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Farm and Rubino Dr | 5,520 | 1.60% | Wren Dr (3.9%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Sheppard | 3,732 | 1.59% | Nashville Dr (3.1%) | 7 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Golf and Gridley | 5,110 | 1.50% | Cortese Cir (5.1%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Warm Springs | 1,960 | 1.50% | Norita Ct (2.5%) | 8 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Sundown | 4,158 | 1.47% | Park Ln (3.3%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Sunrise Almaden | 1,671 | 1.44% | Lillian Way (3.8%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Forest Hill/Westmont | 4,726 | 1.41% | Westmont Ave (5.3%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Thompson Creek | 8,473 | 1.41% | Murman Ct (6.9%) | 11 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Glider | 2,922 | 1.38% | Snell Ave (12.3%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Redmond | 1,744 | 1.36% | Fleet St (3.8%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Cherrywood | 5,412 | 1.35% | Orangestone Way (4.5%) | 8 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Ruskin | 1,066 | 1.35% | Turlock Ln (3.0%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Wooster and East Ct and West Ct | 1,962 | 1.34% | E Julian St (4.4%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Farnham | 1,636 | 1.33% | Wine Grower Way (4.0%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Toyon | 2,827 | 1.33% | Toyon Ct (3.7%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Dartmouth | 1,989 | 1.31% | Blossom Park Ln (3.6%) | 5 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Baldwin | 2,319 | 1.30% | Brockenhurst Dr (10.1%) | 1 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Brooktree | 5,733 | 1.29% | Via Cinco De Mayo (4.2%) | 6 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Murdock | 8,323 | 1.27% | Johnson Ave (3.2%) | 5 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Westfield Oakridge | 728 | 1.27% | Owens Lake Dr (2.6%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Carlton | 1,588 | 1.26% | Winton Way (2.9%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Kooser | 4,446 | 1.26% | Camden Ave (4.7%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Alta Vista | 604 | 1.24% | Gregg Dr (2.5%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Willow Glen West | 2,430 | 1.24% | Hamilton Way (3.9%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Carden | 2,251 | 1.23% | Heather Dr (3.9%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| La Vey | 1,236 | 1.22% | Monrovia Dr (2.1%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Coleman | 2,135 | 1.21% | W Taylor St (7.2%) | 28 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Country Lane | 3,091 | 1.21% | Teresita Dr (3.2%) | 5 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Alviso | 1,920 | 1.19% | America Center Dr (10.0%) | 8 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Good Samaritan | 1,446 | 1.18% | Samaritan Pl (2.7%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Fairground | 2,338 | 1.17% | Mekler Dr (3.8%) | 9 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Moreland West | 3,887 | 1.17% | Fallbrook Ave (3.1%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Commercial | 4,481 | 1.16% | Junesong Way (3.2%) | 4 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Independence and Jackson | 2,662 | 1.15% | Independence HS Access (5.2%) | 10 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Baker West | 1,441 | 1.14% | Northlawn Dr (2.7%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Houge Parker | 1,244 | 1.14% | Apsis Ave (3.1%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Stokes | 4,211 | 1.14% | Huddersfield Ct (3.2%) | 4 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Westgate Village | 3,836 | 1.14% | Vanderbilt Dr (3.1%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Calabazas | 9,662 | 1.13% | Ventana Dr (4.7%) | 8 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Los Gatos Memorial | 1,238 | 1.13% | Adair Way (2.9%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Mitty | 1,805 | 1.13% | Forest Ridge Dr (2.2%) | 6 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Palmia Park | 4,884 | 1.13% | Cottle Rd (3.8%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Cataldi | 3,000 | 1.12% | Junewood Ave (4.0%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Vinci Park | 4,735 | 1.12% | Erinbrook Pl (3.2%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Burbank | 1,865 | 1.11% | Revey Ave (3.4%) | 0 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Berryessa Flea Market-BART | 2,239 | 1.10% | Creekland Cir (3.4%) | 6 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Luna Park | 1,242 | 1.10% | Pavilion Loop (3.1%) | 6 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Rogers | 2,153 | 1.10% | Dermott Dr (5.5%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| English Estates | 3,165 | 1.09% | English Dr (3.1%) | 1 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Alma | 4,036 | 1.08% | La Rossa Cir (4.5%) | 9 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Flickinger | 4,438 | 1.08% | Goldenlake Rd (3.7%) | 7 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Cambrian | 6,894 | 1.07% | Pauline Dr (8.0%) | 8 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Diridon | 2,021 | 1.07% | Park Ave (6.3%) | 12 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Holy Spirit | 1,384 | 1.07% | El Prado Dr (3.8%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Ocala | 1,876 | 1.06% | Ocala Ave (3.8%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Coyote Creek North | 3,029 | 1.04% | McCarthy Blvd (6.2%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Dahl | 7,740 | 1.03% | Haga Dr (3.2%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Dry Creek | 2,328 | 1.03% | Dry Creek Rd (5.2%) | 1 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Strawberry Park | 1,980 | 1.03% | Mitty Way (2.0%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Tamien | 2,558 | 1.03% | Carmel Dr (3.3%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Cadillac Winchester | 7,165 | 1.01% | Chivas Pl (3.6%) | 6 | third | 13 of 13 |
| North Valley | 6,311 | 1.01% | Marco Dr (3.1%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| YB Lucretia | 4,413 | 1.01% | Deer Meadow Ct (3.0%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Branham | 5,638 | 0.99% | Kirk Rd (5.4%) | 7 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Dentwood | 2,220 | 0.99% | Plaza Way (3.1%) | 0 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Hammer | 4,373 | 0.99% | Villa Park Ct (4.5%) | 6 | third | 13 of 13 |
| West Evergreen | 4,609 | 0.99% | Tully Rd (3.0%) | 11 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Ballbach and SOFA | 2,553 | 0.98% | Park Center Plaza (6.1%) | 32 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| San Tomas West | 9,534 | 0.98% | Jim Elder Dr (3.0%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Oster | 4,419 | 0.97% | Prescott Ave (2.1%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Santa Teresa West | 1,383 | 0.97% | Foothill Dr (5.6%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Walnut and N Bascom | 3,106 | 0.97% | W Hedding St (5.0%) | 4 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Foxchase and Oakridge | 1,502 | 0.96% | Blossom River Dr (3.7%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Playa del Rey | 2,735 | 0.96% | Santa Teresa Blvd (3.6%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Starbird | 5,638 | 0.96% | Moreland APT Access (3.3%) | 12 | third | 13 of 13 |
| The Glens | 4,301 | 0.96% | Scottsdale Dr (4.5%) | 6 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Campbell Village Shamrock | 4,907 | 0.95% | Dry Creek Rd (3.6%) | 4 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Las Plumas | 5,616 | 0.95% | McKee Rd (5.9%) | 10 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Metcalf | 5,977 | 0.95% | Tulare Hill Dr (12.8%) | 5 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Riverbend/Golden Wheel/South Bay | 2,088 | 0.95% | Corie Ct (2.8%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Southwest | 3,242 | 0.95% | Southwest Expy (2.8%) | 7 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Valley Palms | 4,597 | 0.95% | Tully Rd (4.1%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Checkers | 6,352 | 0.94% | Checkers Dr APT Access (2.7%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Seven Trees and Lairon | 4,519 | 0.94% | Ezie St (2.4%) | 7 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Sierra Vista | 2,624 | 0.94% | Lombard Ave (2.8%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Oak Grove | 9,779 | 0.93% | Sumba Ct (4.4%) | 13 | second | 13 of 13 |
| The Plant | 1,020 | 0.93% | Little Orchard St (2.8%) | 10 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Blackford | 7,925 | 0.92% | Orchid Way (2.5%) | 7 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Cambrian Park | 1,453 | 0.92% | Stratford Dr (2.3%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Narvaez | 8,069 | 0.92% | Quarry Park Way (3.4%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Airport | 215 | 0.91% | Airport Blvd (5.5%) | 4 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Berryessa Crossing | 4,054 | 0.91% | River Birch Dr (4.8%) | 4 | third | 13 of 13 |
| North Willow Glen | 6,155 | 0.91% | Brace Ave (2.3%) | 16 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Santa Teresa Country Club | 2,725 | 0.91% | Aaron Pl (4.9%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Stevens Creek | 6,127 | 0.91% | Albany Dr (1.9%) | 4 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Olinder-McKinley | 2,242 | 0.90% | Forestdale Ave (2.0%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Spanish Cove | 5,140 | 0.90% | Yuma Dr (1.7%) | 22 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Gardner | 3,315 | 0.89% | Bird Ave (6.4%) | 6 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Valley View Reed | 3,216 | 0.89% | Chard Dr (3.9%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Julian St James | 4,345 | 0.88% | E St James St (2.1%) | 12 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Steindorf-Doerr | 7,678 | 0.88% | Paseo Ln (2.5%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| The Woods | 4,150 | 0.88% | The Woods Dr (1.9%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Rose Garden | 2,691 | 0.87% | Bel Air Ave (2.0%) | 6 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Santa Teresa | 995 | 0.87% | Norred Ct (5.8%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Alexian and Jackson | 4,340 | 0.86% | Damsen Dr (2.0%) | 9 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Fruitdale | 2,836 | 0.86% | Sunrise APT Access (2.7%) | 5 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Los Arboles | 4,412 | 0.86% | Cas Dr (2.2%) | 8 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Meadow Fair | 4,618 | 0.86% | Edgegate Dr (2.5%) | 11 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Naglee | 3,053 | 0.86% | Margaret St (4.7%) | 19 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Valley Fair | 3,196 | 0.86% | Market Row (5.4%) | 8 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Vendome and Ryland | 3,876 | 0.86% | Empire Aly (1.7%) | 7 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Branham/Pearl and Erikson | 4,977 | 0.85% | Chynoweth Ave (3.7%) | 10 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Northside-Empire Gardens | 5,209 | 0.84% | Jackson St (4.4%) | 4 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Monroe | 6,490 | 0.83% | La Maison Dr (3.3%) | 10 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Rancho Santa Teresa Mobile Homes | 1,570 | 0.83% | Running Bear Dr (2.6%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Hyde Park | 443 | 0.82% | Horning St (2.4%) | 10 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| O'Connor | 955 | 0.82% | O'Connor Dr (2.3%) | 1 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Parkmoor | 2,902 | 0.82% | Wainwright Ave (2.6%) | 8 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Pink Elephant and PAL | 3,664 | 0.82% | Bella Rosa MHP Access (2.5%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Poco | 1,764 | 0.82% | S Sunset Ave (2.0%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Umbarger | 6,103 | 0.82% | Villa Monterey (3.4%) | 2 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Cherry | 3,577 | 0.81% | Nola Dr (3.2%) | 6 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Hayes | 3,207 | 0.81% | Branham Ln (5.2%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Hellyer | 3,482 | 0.81% | Sylvandale Ave (7.7%) | 5 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Mulberry | 720 | 0.81% | Cronwell Dr (3.0%) | 3 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Rosenbaum | 1,856 | 0.81% | Vista Roma Dr (3.7%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Sartortte and Rose | 4,404 | 0.81% | Noreen Dr (2.3%) | 10 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Cahalan | 3,822 | 0.80% | Terrazzo Dr (2.7%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Downtown Lincoln Ave | 2,936 | 0.80% | White Pine Ct (1.9%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Skyway and Monterey | 1,356 | 0.80% | Skyway Dr (3.1%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Valley Medical | 5,045 | 0.80% | Longshore Dr (3.9%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Alameda | 9,439 | 0.79% | Liana Way (5.7%) | 38 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Bonita Park | 4,159 | 0.79% | Spiro Dr (5.0%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Dove Hill | 4,330 | 0.79% | Gardie Place Way (4.3%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Hoffman Via Monte | 4,055 | 0.79% | Coleman Rd (2.4%) | 13 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Japantown and Luna Park | 3,075 | 0.79% | Heinlen Ct (1.8%) | 17 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Little Saigon and Spring Brook | 2,139 | 0.79% | Bevin Brook Dr (4.2%) | 19 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Los Paseos | 2,272 | 0.79% | Sessions Dr (5.6%) | 3 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Magic Sands Mobile Homes | 2,175 | 0.79% | Aladdin Dr (2.5%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Owsley | 2,823 | 0.79% | Millsgate Ln (3.0%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Goodyear Mastic | 4,746 | 0.78% | Pepitone Ave (5.8%) | 7 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Gunderson and Vista Park | 2,983 | 0.78% | Canela Way (2.6%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Northside-Backesto | 1,277 | 0.78% | E Empire St (1.4%) | 3 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| San Tomas Aquino Park | 3,348 | 0.78% | Lemoyne Way (3.1%) | 5 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Winchester | 4,834 | 0.78% | Saratoga Ave (2.9%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Brokaw | 3,802 | 0.77% | Concourse Dr (3.0%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Guadalupe Washington | 3,635 | 0.77% | Willow St (4.6%) | 9 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Lincoln Glen | 2,175 | 0.77% | Faircliff Ct (2.5%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Shasta/Hanchett Park | 1,374 | 0.77% | N Willard Ave (3.8%) | 5 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Thousand Oaks | 3,559 | 0.77% | Hampshire Pl (3.0%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Andrew Hill and Sylvandale | 2,727 | 0.76% | Lantern Way (3.4%) | 8 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Fruitdale and Sherman Oaks | 6,895 | 0.76% | Willowleaf Dr (3.5%) | 13 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Reed | 1,834 | 0.76% | Silva Ave (2.0%) | 0 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Richmond Menker | 2,472 | 0.76% | Douglas Pl (3.3%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Windmill Springs | 2,604 | 0.76% | Loupe Ave (4.1%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Cypress | 5,101 | 0.75% | Alyssum Ln (3.1%) | 0 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Delmas Park | 1,930 | 0.75% | Royal Ave (2.7%) | 11 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| South University | 7,318 | 0.75% | S 8th St (2.0%) | 13 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Winchester Lynnhaven | 6,180 | 0.75% | Trifone Dr (2.7%) | 8 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Mayfair | 8,114 | 0.74% | McCreery Ave (2.5%) | 16 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Parma | 4,882 | 0.74% | Brockenhurst Dr (18.7%) | 3 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Ramblewood/Tuers | 3,589 | 0.74% | E Capitol Expy (3.8%) | 6 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Willow Vale | 2,095 | 0.74% | Sycamore Glen (8.1%) | 1 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Orchard | 5,125 | 0.73% | Schallenberger Rd (3.9%) | 12 | third | 13 of 13 |
| San Pedro and Convention Center | 831 | 0.73% | W William St (1.5%) | 4 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek | 4,715 | 0.73% | Wool Creek Dr (4.5%) | 66 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Welch Park | 2,417 | 0.73% | Swift Ave (2.1%) | 8 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Downtown and SOFA | 3,581 | 0.72% | Paseo De San Antonio (2.2%) | 37 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Japantown and Hensley | 5,364 | 0.72% | N 1st St (5.9%) | 16 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Village Oaks | 7,549 | 0.72% | Hospital Pkwy (4.4%) | 8 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Hamann Park | 1,558 | 0.71% | N Central Ave (2.6%) | 1 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Tasman and Zanker | 20,096 | 0.71% | Southbay Dr (4.9%) | 10 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| The Willows | 3,251 | 0.71% | Sandra Dr (2.3%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Aborn and Silver Creek | 2,195 | 0.70% | E Capitol Expy (5.0%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Bagby | 2,989 | 0.70% | Maykirk Rd (5.9%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Sakamota | 3,757 | 0.69% | Colleen Ct (5.1%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Trimble Business Area | 8,687 | 0.69% | Charcot Ave (5.7%) | 22 | third | 13 of 13 |
| O'Connor Park | 4,736 | 0.68% | McEvoy St (1.9%) | 21 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Stonegate | 5,732 | 0.68% | Tully Rd (4.0%) | 13 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Olinder-Brookwood Terrace | 1,918 | 0.67% | S 23rd St (2.0%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Pinehurst | 1,520 | 0.67% | Bend Ave (2.6%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Virginia and Martha | 4,938 | 0.67% | S 12th St (1.6%) | 20 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Willowmont | 1,773 | 0.67% | Ensalmo Ave (1.8%) | 0 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Dobern and Capitol Park | 3,761 | 0.66% | Excalibur Dr (3.1%) | 11 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Overfelt High | 3,036 | 0.66% | Cunningham Ave (5.3%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Turtle Rock and Meadows | 3,868 | 0.66% | Spokane Dr (2.6%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Palmhaven | 1,307 | 0.65% | Leona Ct (2.2%) | 1 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Cassell and Foxdale | 6,910 | 0.64% | Foxdale Dr (2.4%) | 8 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Davis and Roeder | 2,991 | 0.64% | Edenview Dr (13.0%) | 5 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Five Wounds-San Jose High | 2,532 | 0.64% | E Santa Clara St (4.1%) | 15 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Roundtable | 3,738 | 0.64% | Glenbrook APT Access (3.5%) | 0 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Lido | 0 | 0.63% | Thackeray Ln (2.1%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Blossom Valley | 7,849 | 0.62% | Lathrop Dr (3.7%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Mount Alban and Sunshadow and Olinder Industrial | 2,108 | 0.61% | Felipe Ave (1.9%) | 10 | second | 13 of 13 |
| River Glen | 2,800 | 0.61% | Willow Glen Way (2.0%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Carson and Meadows | 2,291 | 0.60% | Faye Park Dr (2.7%) | 4 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Schallenberger | 1,639 | 0.60% | Old Almaden Rd (3.0%) | 9 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| St James Park | 878 | 0.60% | N 2nd St (1.6%) | 8 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Greylands | 1,003 | 0.59% | Braddock Ct (3.6%) | 2 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Lincoln and Roy | 1,119 | 0.59% | Lincoln Village Dr (3.4%) | 3 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Northside-Grant | 848 | 0.59% | Jackson St (1.2%) | 8 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Greater Santee | 3,334 | 0.58% | Summer Blossom Ave (2.0%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Kirk | 1,719 | 0.56% | San Clemente Ave (1.8%) | 1 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Silver Leaf | 6,127 | 0.56% | Silver Leaf Rd (3.3%) | 4 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Chesbro | 4,071 | 0.55% | Indian Ave (3.1%) | 1 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Roosevelt | 1,165 | 0.55% | Library Ln (1.8%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Willow Glen South | 859 | 0.55% | Denise Way (2.5%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Martial Cottle Park | 3,680 | 0.54% | Avenida Palmas (3.2%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Muir | 1,395 | 0.54% | Branham Ln (1.9%) | 2 | third | 13 of 13 |
| Little Portugal | 3,466 | 0.53% | Alum Rock Ave (2.2%) | 10 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Pacina | 2,124 | 0.53% | Cinderella Ln (1.1%) | 0 | second | 13 of 13 |
| University | 2,958 | 0.53% | E William St (1.5%) | 26 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Briarwood | 1,456 | 0.52% | Meridian Ave (1.1%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Civic Center | 1,530 | 0.52% | Burton Ave (2.2%) | 16 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| South Stokes | 1,907 | 0.52% | Grace Ave (2.1%) | 0 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Rosemary | 4,174 | 0.51% | Airport Pkwy (2.6%) | 7 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Calero and Oak Ridge | 3,064 | 0.47% | Snell Ave (2.3%) | 7 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Horace Mann and SJSU | 4,558 | 0.47% | N 5th St (1.6%) | 22 | highest | 13 of 13 |
| Park View | 5,343 | 0.45% | Monet Cir (2.0%) | 2 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Edenvale | 2,181 | 0.44% | War Admiral Ave (1.2%) | 1 | lowest | 13 of 13 |
| Hillview | 6,527 | 0.44% | Hopkins Dr (1.8%) | 16 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Frost and Herman | 3,199 | 0.43% | Snell Way (3.0%) | 3 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Tropicana and Lanai | 4,329 | 0.43% | Sumatra Ave (2.2%) | 10 | second | 13 of 13 |
| Plata Arroyo | 1,181 | 0.33% | Silcreek Dr (2.3%) | 5 | second | 13 of 13 |
If you call your neighborhood something else
No city has one vocabulary. The City's 297 polygons are one; the 266 neighborhood-association, business-association and homeowner-association boundaries the City also publishes are another, and its 15 planning areas are a third. Every one of those 281 other names was mapped onto the 297 from geometry, by sampling points across its boundary, never from a typed list.
Most land cleanly: North Willow Glen NA is 99.7% the Gardner row, Blossom Valley NA is 99.6% Blossom Valley, Communications Hill NA is 99.5% Communications Hill. Willow Glen as a business district is mostly the North Willow Glen row (55%) with Downtown Lincoln Ave (29%) and Palmhaven (15%). Downtown, as the San Jose Downtown Association draws it, is Ballbach and SOFA (38%), Downtown and SOFA (16%), San Pedro and Convention Center (10%) and seven more rows.
Berryessa, as its citizens' council draws it, spans 31 rows, led by Sierra Vista Hills (22%) and Suncrest (16%), which is the steep end of a name most people use for flat ground.
The 64 names (51 association areas, 13 planning areas) that land less than 60% in any one row are published with every row they touch, three of them lying outside every polygon, so a reader searching the name they use lands on the ground their streets are actually on:
| The name you use | Mostly the row… | …and also |
|---|---|---|
| Almaden (planning area) | Quicksilver (23.4%) | Santa Teresa Hills 19%; Almaden Guadalupe Park 12%; Los Alamitos Creek 8%; Graystone 4% |
| Almaden Golf & Country Club | Almaden Country Club (41.8%) | Castillero and Simonds 28%; Almaden Guadalupe Park 14%; Trinidad 12%; Williams 3% |
| Alum Rock (planning area) | East Foothills (25.1%) | Mount Pleasant Foothills 11%; San Jose Country Club 3%; Mayfair 3%; Las Plumas 3% |
| Alum Rock Santa Clara Business Association | Mayfair (20.4%) | Little Portugal 18%; Five Wounds-San Jose High 13%; Lyndale 10%; Checkers 9% |
| Alum Rock Village Action Committee (ARVAC) | John Vianney (35.3%) | East Hills and White 24%; Cureton and Joseph George 18%; Linda Vista and Hillcrest 14%; La Pala 8% |
| Alum Rock Village Business Association (Latino Business Foundation Silicon Valley) | East Hills and White (41.4%) | John Vianney 31%; Lyndale 21%; James Lick and Pleasant Ridge 7% |
| Arbuckle/Poco Way NA | Poco (38.0%) | Pacina 37%; Lido 23%; Hillview 2%; Dobern and Capitol Park 0% |
| Avana Skyway | Martial Cottle Park (57.7%) | Park View 41%; Skyway and Monterey 2% |
| Berryessa (planning area) | Sierra Vista Hills (22.5%) | Suncrest 16%; Brokaw 7%; Orchard 7%; North Berryessa 6% |
| Berryessa Business Association | Brokaw (11.2%) | Orchard 11%; North Berryessa 9%; Penitencia Creek 8%; Commercial 8% |
| Berryessa Citizens Advisory Council | Sierra Vista Hills (22.3%) | Suncrest 16%; Brokaw 7%; North Berryessa 6%; Penitencia Creek 5% |
| Buena Vista NA | Richmond Menker (51.2%) | Fruitdale 43%; Parkmoor 6% |
| Burbank Community Association | Parkmoor (51.7%) | Burbank 33%; Fruitdale 15%; Valley Fair 0% |
| Cahalan-Canoas NA | Chesbro (56.1%) | Cahalan 43%; Santa Teresa West 0%; Frost and Herman 0%; Steinbeck and Allen 0% |
| Calero (planning area) | Santa Teresa Hills (30.9%) | Coyote Creek 9%; Quicksilver 0% |
| Calle Willow Business Association | Goodyear Mastic (55.8%) | Guadalupe Washington 44% |
| Cambrian Community Council | Cambrian (22.5%) | Oster 15%; Campbell Village Shamrock 8%; Houge Parker 8%; Carden 7% |
| Cambrian/Pioneer (planning area) | Branham (8.3%) | Oster 8%; Kooser 7%; Lone Hill 6%; Sartortte and Rose 5% |
| Central (planning area) | Alameda (7.7%) | Coleman 7%; Rose Garden 4%; O'Connor Park 4%; Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek 3% |
| Country Lane NA | English Estates (54.3%) | Country Lane 45%; Rogers 0%; Moreland West 0% |
| D7 Leadership Group | Communications Hill (15.5%) | Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek 12%; Stonegate 7%; Little Saigon and Spring Brook 6%; Dahl 5% |
| District 5 United | East Foothills (34.3%) | Mount Pleasant Foothills 8%; San Jose Country Club 4%; Mayfair 3%; East Hills and White 3% |
| District 8 Community Roundtable | Fowler Creek (9.4%) | Silver Creek Country Club 7%; Mount Pleasant Foothills 6%; The Villages 3%; Evergreen Valley High 2% |
| District 9 Leadership Group | Steindorf-Doerr (7.1%) | Cambrian 7%; Branham 6%; Oster 6%; Branham/Pearl and Erikson 5% |
| EGOPIC | Stripe Elementary and Great Oaks (34.7%) | Edenvale 34%; Davis and Roeder 21%; Coyote and Senter 9%; Roundtable 1% |
| East Village San Jose Business Association | Horace Mann and SJSU (31.6%) | Roosevelt 23%; University 18%; Naglee 16%; Julian St James 9% |
| Edenvale (planning area) | Shady Oaks and Basking Ridge (25.3%) | Los Alamitos Creek 7%; Village Oaks 4%; Metcalf 4%; Santa Teresa 3% |
| Evergreen (planning area) | Fowler Creek (21.6%) | Silver Creek Country Club 15%; Mount Pleasant Foothills 10%; The Villages 7%; Evergreen Valley High 5% |
| Evergreen Leadership NA | Mount Pleasant Foothills (30.8%) | Norwood 27%; Valle Vista 20%; The Glens 12%; Boeger and Fernish Park 10% |
| Frontier Village | Skyway and Monterey (58.0%) | Hayes 38%; Valley Christian 4% |
| Harwood Hill | outside every one of the 297 polygons | — |
| Hellyer Christopher NA | Hellyer (53.1%) | Coyote and Senter 44%; Stripe Elementary and Great Oaks 1%; Valley Christian 1%; Los Arboles 0% |
| Japantown Neighborhood (Japantown Community Congress, Japantown Business Association, Japantown NA) | Japantown and Luna Park (34.1%) | Japantown and Hensley 22%; Vendome and Ryland 22%; Civic Center 22% |
| Los Paseos NA | Los Paseos (50.3%) | Metcalf 50% |
| Monterey Corridor Business Association | Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek (25.9%) | Communications Hill 25%; The Plant 22%; Alma 9%; Dahl 7% |
| North (planning area) | Trimble Business Area (40.8%) | Tasman and Zanker 22%; Airport 20%; Rosemary 9%; Coyote Creek North 7% |
| North 13th Street/Luna Park Business Association | Northside-Grant (34.0%) | Japantown and Luna Park 34%; Luna Park 17%; Northside-Empire Gardens 15% |
| Northside NA | Northside-Empire Gardens (33.9%) | Northside-Grant 13%; Northside-Backesto 12%; Julian St James 12%; Japantown and Hensley 10% |
| Olinder NA | Olinder-Brookwood Terrace (54.3%) | Olinder-McKinley 39%; Bonita Park 5%; Naglee 1%; Five Wounds-San Jose High 0% |
| Park Almaden HOA | Westfield Oakridge (53.6%) | Steinbeck and Allen 45%; Almaden Lake 2% |
| Rock Springs NA | Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek (50.0%) | Little Saigon and Spring Brook 50% |
| San Felipe (planning area) | outside every one of the 297 polygons | — |
| San Jose Downtown Association | Ballbach and SOFA (38.5%) | Downtown and SOFA 16%; San Pedro and Convention Center 10%; St James Park 7%; Delmas Park 7% |
| Santa Teresa Bernal NA | Baldwin (41.5%) | Parma 30%; Santa Teresa 21%; Village Oaks 7%; Santa Teresa Hills 0% |
| Santa Teresa Foothills NA | La Colina (31.9%) | Sakamota 31%; Glider 22%; Almaden Lake 6%; Santa Teresa West 5% |
| Senter Monterey NA | Dahl (41.9%) | Fairground 31%; Umbarger 22%; Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek 4%; Communications Hill 0% |
| Seven Trees NA | Andrew Hill and Sylvandale (46.0%) | Los Arboles 27%; Seven Trees and Lairon 26%; The Woods 0%; Valley Christian 0% |
| Shasta/Hanchett Park NA | Alameda (59.9%) | Shasta/Hanchett Park 16%; Diridon 14%; Rose Garden 10%; Coleman 0% |
| Silver Oak Estates NA | The Villages (50.0%) | Villages 38%; Silver Creek Country Club 12% |
| South (planning area) | Communications Hill (15.3%) | Spartan Keyes and Wool Creek 9%; Stonegate 6%; Narvaez 5%; Hellyer 5% |
| Story Rd | Hillview (30.4%) | Tropicana and Lanai 12%; Lido 12%; Cassell and Foxdale 12%; Kolmar and Ryan 10% |
| Strawberry Park NA | Blackford (52.1%) | Mitty 25%; Strawberry Park 23% |
| Sunrise Almaden | Sunrise Almaden (59.6%) | Graystone 18%; Los Alamitos Creek 14%; Almaden Lake 8%; Trinidad 1% |
| The Alameda Park NA | Alameda (55.0%) | the other 45% lies outside every polygon |
| Tropicana Lanai NA | Valley Palms (52.4%) | Tropicana and Lanai 47%; West Evergreen 0% |
| University Neighborhoods Coalition (NAC) | Naglee (32.6%) | South University 24%; Horace Mann and SJSU 17%; University 17%; Downtown and SOFA 7% |
| Uvas Road | outside every one of the 297 polygons | — |
| Valley View Reed NA | Valley View Reed (37.3%) | Willowmont 25%; Reed 25%; Branham 13% |
| West San Carlos Street Neighborhood Business Association | Shasta/Hanchett Park (22.3%) | O'Connor Park 22%; Parkmoor 21%; Burbank 15%; Delmas Park 9% |
| West Valley (planning area) | Calabazas (10.3%) | Murdock 9%; Winchester Lynnhaven 7%; Blackford 6%; Monroe 6% |
| Willow Glen (planning area) | Steindorf-Doerr (8.2%) | Cambrian 8%; Fruitdale and Sherman Oaks 7%; North Willow Glen 7%; Valley Medical 7% |
| Willow Glen Business Association | North Willow Glen (55.2%) | Downtown Lincoln Ave 29%; Palmhaven 15%; Gardner 1% |
| Willow Glen NA | Cherry (11.7%) | North Willow Glen 9%; Downtown Lincoln Ave 8%; Dry Creek 8%; The Willows 7% |
| Winchester Row Business Association | Valley Fair (30.8%) | Winchester Lynnhaven 28%; Monroe 19%; Cypress 11%; Cadillac Winchester 11% |
Every block of the city, measured
Of the 35,632 graded blocks, 3,844 exceed 3.50% on their end-to-end grade or on a pitch that survived the holds, which is the line above which at least one machine with a computed speed drops under 8 mph for a 280 lb rider. Below it, the block does not decide the bike, for anyone on this page.
Among the deciding blocks, 349 carry a surviving pitch of 15% or more, 643 climb 8% or more end to end, and on 557 of them (534 on the pitch, 23 more on an end-to-end grade whose pitch is withheld) no machine here holds 8 mph for a 190 lb rider on the motor alone: those are the blocks you pedal, walk, or route around.
460 of the deciding blocks fall outside every neighborhood polygon; they are the rural roads inside the city line, Mount Hamilton Road among them.
Inside the polygons the deciding blocks concentrate where the grounds table says they should: East Foothills (236), Silver Creek Country Club (236), Norwood (195), Evergreen Valley High (164), Communications Hill (148), Mount Pleasant Foothills (140), Fowler Creek (132), Villages (105), The Villages (97), Shady Oaks and Basking Ridge (94), Los Alamitos Creek (83).
The table lists the sixty steepest blocks with a named street and a surviving pitch, by pitch. A block whose pitch was withheld is not here; the 88 deciding blocks in that state stay in the counts on their end-to-end grade alone. The full 35,632-row file, with every hold and its reason, is available from us on request.
| Block | Neighborhood | Length (m) | End-to-end grade | Pitch (steepest 30 m) | Machines holding 8 mph on the pitch at 190 lb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merkley Row | East Foothills | 394 | 18.3% | 25.5% | 0 of 13 |
| Kenny Ln | East Foothills | 225 | 16.1% | 24.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Echo Knolls Rd | East Foothills | 736 | 13.7% | 24.3% | 0 of 13 |
| Echo Knolls Rd | East Foothills | 416 | 18.3% | 24.0% | 0 of 13 |
| Almaden Quicksilver Park | Quicksilver | 145 | 15.6% | 23.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Serene Way | Los Alamitos Creek | 252 | 14.8% | 23.7% | 0 of 13 |
| Higuera Highland Ln | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 424 | 12.1% | 23.4% | 0 of 13 |
| Deer Park Ct | (outside every polygon) | 205 | 20.2% | 23.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Higuera Highland Ln | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 500 | 17.0% | 22.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Higuera Highland Ln | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 1017 | 12.8% | 22.5% | 0 of 13 |
| Cinnabar Hills Rd | Santa Teresa Hills | 712 | 14.6% | 22.4% | 0 of 13 |
| Merkley Row | East Foothills | 330 | 14.8% | 22.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Harry Rd | Los Alamitos Creek | 256 | 18.5% | 22.0% | 0 of 13 |
| Drysdale Dr | (outside every polygon) | 211 | 16.9% | 21.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Via De La Vista | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 634 | 13.6% | 21.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Fairmont Dr | East Foothills | 265 | 12.0% | 21.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Murietta Ln | East Foothills | 350 | 13.9% | 21.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Rome Dr | Quicksilver | 291 | 14.4% | 21.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Hillpoint Ct | Los Alamitos Creek | 214 | 14.5% | 21.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Timothy Ln | Santa Teresa Hills | 297 | 5.9% | 21.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Barnard Rd | (outside every polygon) | 731 | 13.0% | 21.4% | 0 of 13 |
| Story Ln | Warner Heights | 176 | 10.2% | 21.3% | 0 of 13 |
| Lazy Ln | Fowler Creek | 253 | 8.9% | 21.3% | 0 of 13 |
| Lochinvar Way | Suncrest | 42 | 17.7% | 21.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Alamitos Rd | (outside every polygon) | 448 | 9.9% | 21.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Kenny Ln | East Foothills | 156 | 11.2% | 21.0% | 0 of 13 |
| Perie Ln | Suncrest | 96 | 17.2% | 20.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Canyon Dr | San Jose Country Club | 266 | 15.8% | 20.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Road D | East Foothills | 318 | 12.6% | 20.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Vista Loma | Los Alamitos Creek | 129 | 17.1% | 20.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Mann Oak Ct | Quicksilver | 191 | 14.4% | 20.7% | 0 of 13 |
| Watters Ct | Cureton and Joseph George | 94 | 16.2% | 20.7% | 0 of 13 |
| Perie Ln | Suncrest | 110 | 18.7% | 20.6% | 0 of 13 |
| View Oaks Way | Los Alamitos Creek | 524 | 10.6% | 20.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Arnerich Rd | (outside every polygon) | 330 | 11.4% | 20.5% | 0 of 13 |
| Harwood Ct | (outside every polygon) | 200 | 13.8% | 20.4% | 0 of 13 |
| Chaboya Hills Ct | Evergreen Valley High | 114 | 15.9% | 20.3% | 0 of 13 |
| Valley Ridge Ln | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 255 | 8.6% | 20.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Perie Ln | Suncrest | 133 | 17.7% | 20.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Graystone Ln | Los Alamitos Creek | 436 | 14.1% | 20.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Gum Tree Ln | (outside every polygon) | 301 | 7.0% | 20.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Ridgeview Ave | East Foothills | 97 | 15.0% | 20.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Diduca Way | (outside every polygon) | 370 | 7.0% | 19.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Boulder Dr | Suncrest | 242 | 14.6% | 19.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Perie Ln | Suncrest | 310 | 11.4% | 19.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Simoni Dr | East Foothills | 92 | 16.2% | 19.9% | 0 of 13 |
| Greenridge Ter | (outside every polygon) | 177 | 10.9% | 19.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Valley Oak Dr | Coyote Creek | 1505 | 7.4% | 19.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Deer Park Rd | (outside every polygon) | 323 | 12.9% | 19.8% | 0 of 13 |
| Chaboya Rd | Evergreen Valley High | 68 | 16.4% | 19.7% | 0 of 13 |
| Aborn Rd | Fowler Creek | 226 | 11.1% | 19.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Scenic Vista Dr | Los Alamitos Creek | 324 | 16.1% | 19.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Francis Oaks Way | (outside every polygon) | 258 | 12.6% | 19.6% | 0 of 13 |
| E Dunne Ave | (outside every polygon) | 2504 | 1.2% | 19.6% | 0 of 13 |
| Balcom Rd | Mount Pleasant Foothills | 142 | 11.9% | 19.4% | 0 of 13 |
| Almaden Oaks Ln | Quicksilver | 496 | 11.8% | 19.3% | 0 of 13 |
| Aborn Rd | Evergreen Valley High | 151 | 16.5% | 19.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Carol Dr | Communications Hill | 205 | 14.6% | 19.2% | 0 of 13 |
| Skuse Ct | Los Alamitos Creek | 182 | 10.4% | 19.1% | 0 of 13 |
| Simoni Dr | East Foothills | 225 | 11.8% | 19.1% | 0 of 13 |
Bikeways, trails and pavement
The City's bikeway layer, computed from its own linework segment by segment, measures 565.6 centerline miles of existing bikeway. The layer's own mileage column sums to 610.2, and the difference is not a rounding error: on 171 streets every segment carries the corridor's total, so 10th Street's four segments each read 2.370 miles and adding them counts the street four times. No figure on this page uses that column.
Inside the 297 polygons the measured network is 537.3 miles, and by Caltrans class it runs 70.3 miles of Class 1 path, 287.7 of Class 2 lane, 102.4 of Class 3 sharrow or bicycle boulevard, and 76.3 of Class 4 separated bikeway, with 0.6 miles carrying no class in the layer; 146.6 of those miles are protected.
The densest networks by land area are Downtown and SOFA (26.1 miles per square mile on 0.16 square miles, 29.6% of it protected), Julian St James (15.8) and Dobern and Capitol Park (14.9).
The trail layer carries 232.2 miles, of which the City marks 146.3 open: 105.5 paved, 6.6 interim and 34.2 hiking, with 38.3 planned, 21.1 in study, 19.2 to be identified, 5.6 in design and 1.7 carrying no status. The open paved miles are the creek-trail reaches the trail area is built for, at the 15 mph ceiling of § 13.44.100(C).
Pavement is a tire-width question. The City's Pavement Condition Index, surveyed March 8, 2024, scores 10,827 street segments over 2,374.8 miles at a mile-weighted mean of 72.7 and a median of 76; 322.2 miles, 13.6%, score "Poor".
Among the 170 polygons with at least five scored miles, the worst shares are Cahalan (66% of its scored miles Poor, mean 42), Guadalupe (65%, mean 44), English Estates (62%), Murdock (59%) and Forest Hill/Westmont (58%); 85 polygons score no Poor miles at all, Calabazas (22.7 scored miles), North Berryessa (20.5), Coyote Creek (20.4) and Cadwallader (18.3) the largest of them.
On the worst of those streets the 4-inch tires on the TIGER RL, both FLASH LITEs, the Kunlun, the Defender, the Foldtan and the two fat-tire DWMEIGI trikes are the specification; the META range and the Hera ride narrower.
Bike, light rail, Caltrain and BART
The three agencies' own pages, read in full on September 16, 2026:
VTA light rail (vta.org/go/bike): "The maximum number of bicycles allowed inside a light rail vehicle is six. Up to four bicycles can be accommodated in the racks provided, with two additional bicycles allowed to stand on the floor in the center section (turntable area) of the vehicle." And a sentence every e-bike rider should read before relying on the train: "Only human powered and sealed dry or gel cell electric assisted bicycles are allowed."
Every machine on this page carries a lithium pack.
VTA's published rule names sealed dry or gel cell batteries and does not mention lithium either way; this page does not resolve that for you, and a rider whose commute depends on light rail should confirm it with VTA before buying.
Caltrain (caltrain.com/rider-information/bicycles): "With bikes allowed onboard and eLockers located throughout the system at nearly every station, it's easier than ever to bike and use Caltrain."
BART (bart.gov/guide/bikes/rules): "Folded bikes are allowed in all cars at all times." "Bikes are allowed on all trains except in the first car or any crowded car." "Regardless of any other rule, bikes are never allowed on crowded cars." "Bikes are allowed on elevators, stairs, and escalators", on most escalators since January 1, 2024, and BART publishes an elevator dimension guide because, in its words, "many bikes these days are big."
None of the three pages mentions tricycles, in either direction. A trike on the train is therefore not confirmed here, and the transit area is built on folders. The META20 at 63.4 lb is the one to carry up a Caltrain step; BART's folded-bike rule is what makes the Foldtan and the Kunlun all-hours machines there.
Is there a San Jose e-bike rebate?
Two programs a San Jose buyer will be told about, read at their publishers on September 16 and re-read on September 19, 2026, and one that is not San Jose's.
The California E-Bike Incentive Project has ended. The Air Resources Board's own page says the project "provided up to $2,000 in voucher incentives to low-income California residents", that it "began in December 2022 and concluded in December 2025", and that it "distributed 2,246 e-bike incentives" (ww2.arb.ca.gov). Anyone quoting the $2,000 California e-bike voucher in the present tense in 2026 is quoting a program that closed.
Clean Cars for All is open, and it is not an e-bike rebate. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District's program page reads "Program Status: Open" and says the program "relaunched on 8/19/2025 and is now accepting new applications" (baaqmd.gov).
Its own FAQ: "Grants of $7,500 are available for mobility options (e.g. public transit and e-bikes)".
To qualify, "you must own a model year 2007 or older passenger vehicle that has been registered or operated in California for more than two (2) years, live in the Bay Area within the Air District's jurisdiction, and have a qualifying household income below 300 percent of the federal poverty level", after which "you are required to leave your old vehicle at the dismantler for scrapping" (FAQ).
Santa Clara County is inside the District. It is a scrap-your-car grant with an e-bike option, and the e-bike option is confirmed with the District's administrator, GRID Alternatives, before you count on it.
Silicon Valley Power is the City of Santa Clara's own utility, and its rebates are for its customers. San Jose's electricity program is San José Clean Energy, the City of San Jose's community choice program, so a Santa Clara municipal-utility rebate does not reach a San Jose address.
The honest ledger
What the record supports for each pick, and who each pick is wrong for, in one table.
| What the record supports | Who it is wrong for, and what to read instead |
|---|---|
| Every machine here is 750 W or under, buyable on our store today, and inside § 312.5(a) on the statute's own words | A rider who wants a computed climb figure on three wheels: the ONE-TRIKE carries one; the 750 W trikes are placed on their published limbs (Limitations, item 1) |
| The FLASH LITE ST clears 900 of 2,880 situations on published fit, ceiling and a removable pack | Anyone carrying it up a flight (82 lb): the META20 |
| The META275 1.0 is the cheapest torque-sensor commuter here, $300 under the maker's price | Riders outside 5'6"–6'1" or over 266 lb loaded: the TIGER RL or the ST |
| The Kunlun posts the best motor-alone climb figures on the page at 68 lb | Riders over 260 lb loaded, on its 280 lb ceiling: the FLASH LITE 2.0 |
| The Hera is the trike the matrix hands to a returning rider on flat and rolling ground, with a parking brake and a 4'11" floor | Hilly ground or a rider over 6'2": the ONE-TRIKE or the MG1703 |
| The MAX-CARGO carries 440 lb on two wheels for $1,699 | Anyone who wants the load to stand still at the curb: the ONE-TRIKE |
| Owner feedback was read for every pick on the routes named in Limitations, and nothing read disqualified one | A rider who buys on owner testimony rather than on the makers' figures: the ST, the Hera and the MAX-CARGO are the picks this page quotes owners on |
Why buy it here
Every pick ships free to any address in the lower 48. Warranty support is handled from the United States, by us, and if a machine arrives with a shipping problem we file the claim. Shop Pay installments are offered at checkout for buyers who qualify, and every card above carries the maker's own list price beside ours where the maker's is higher.
The cart links on this page go to the exact variant that is buyable today, read from our store the morning this page was written.
The budget torque-sensor commuter for flat San Jose, $300 under the maker's own price, for riders 5'6" to 6'1". Free shipping, US warranty support, Shop Pay installments at checkout.
Buy the META275 1.0 — $1,399Questions San Jose riders ask
What electric bike should I buy if I live in San Jose?
Read your neighborhood's row in the table. If its 90th-percentile grade is under 3.5%, the hill does not decide and the FLASH LITE ST ($1,899) or the META275 1.0 ($1,399) does; over it, the Kunlun ($2,599) if the bike must fold or be carried and the FLASH LITE 2.0 ($1,899) if it must carry a load. If you have not ridden in years, the Hera.
The matrix resolves 1,610 of 2,880 combinations of ground, rider, load and storage.
Are electric bikes street legal in California?
Yes, when the machine fits § 312.5(a): fully operable pedals and a motor that does not exceed 750 watts, in class 1, 2 or 3. Under § 24016(b) a rider is then not subject to driver's license, registration, license-plate or financial-responsibility rules, and the machine is not a motor vehicle. A 750-watt motor does not exceed 750 watts, so 750 W is legal; above 750 W or 28 mph the machine stops being a bicycle.
Do I need a helmet to ride an e-bike in San Jose?
If you are under 18, yes, on any bicycle (§ 21212). On a class 3 electric bicycle, yes at every age (§ 21213). Over 18 on a class 1 or 2, the Vehicle Code does not require one.
Can a 14-year-old ride an electric bike in San Jose?
On a class 1 or 2, yes, with a helmet on your rider. Not on a class 3: § 21213 bars anyone under 16 from operating one, and since January 1, 2026, § 21212.5 bars anyone from selling a class 3 to a person under 16. The kids' area is class 2 and lower only.
Can you ride an electric bike on the sidewalk in San Jose?
Yes, except on five downtown blocks; outside them your sidewalk ride is legal. § 11.72.190 forbids sidewalk riding only in the "designated area" § 11.04.031 defines: San Fernando from Cahill to Eleventh, and First through Fourth Streets from St. John to San Carlos. Children twelve and under, and an adult accompanying them, are exempt even there (§ 11.72.200). At night the § 21201(d) lights apply on the sidewalk too.
Can I ride an e-bike on the Guadalupe River and Coyote Creek trails?
Where the City has posted that riding is permitted, yes, at 15 mph unless a different limit is posted (§ 13.44.100(C) and (D)). The City marks 146.3 miles of trail open, 105.5 of them paved. The trail area picks your machine for that ceiling.
Are electric bikes good uphill, and can they climb San Jose's hills?
On the motor alone, a 750 W machine holds 13.6 mph up an 8% block with a 130 lb rider and 8.9 mph with a 280 lb rider (FLASH LITE 2.0 at 92 lb). On the 13.75% steep test no machine here holds 8 mph with a 190 lb rider without pedaling. Eighty-one percent of San Jose's residents live where the 90th-percentile block is under 2%, and there the hill never decides.
How much does rider weight matter on an e-bike?
On any grade from 2% up, your weight matters two to eight times as much as your fitness. At 8% with an easy pedal on the FLASH LITE 2.0, the difference between a 130 lb and a 250 lb rider costs 3.1 mph, and going from untrained to trained legs buys 0.4 to 0.7 mph; on the motor alone the same weight gap costs 4.0 mph.
On the flat, before the 20 mph cap, the heavier rider is 0.4 mph faster.
The heavy-rider guide goes deeper.
Which electric bikes are best for seniors?
Age is not the row the matrix reads; riding history is. If you have ridden in the last year, you are matched on weight, height and ground like anyone else. If you have not ridden in years, you are matched to three wheels: the Hera on flat and rolling ground, the ONE-TRIKE on hilly ground. The seniors' guide covers the whole shelf.
Are electric bikes safe for seniors?
The balance finding is what the record supports: in an instrumented experiment, pedelecs were less stable than conventional bicycles in the move from standing to balance regardless of the rider's age, and about 17% of pedelec injuries in that population were falls while mounting or dismounting (Twisk et al. 2017). What a tricycle changes is the balance requirement; the rider stays the same. It brings its own rule: slow down before cornering.
Are electric trikes safe for seniors, and do they tip over?
A trike stands up at every stop, which is why a rider who has not ridden in years is matched to one (Meijaard et al. 2007). A rigid three-wheeler can lift its inside wheel in a fast turn, for the same reason a tall vehicle can; the maker's own instruction is to "practice in a flat, open area and slow down before cornering." No maker publishes a center-of-gravity height, so this page computes no tipping speed.
Are adult tricycles easy to ride?
Easy to balance, different to steer. Hera owners say it takes a while to be comfortable. Plan your first rides in an empty lot, use the parking brake to mount and dismount, and take corners slowly.
What is the best electric tricycle for adults, and how much does one cost?
On this page: the Hera at $1,499 for flat and rolling ground, the ONE-TRIKE 2.0 at $1,799 for hilly ground and a 440 lb load, the MG1703 at $1,999 with 750 W and fat tires, the Silverado HD at $2,899 with a reverse gear, and the M-380 tandem at $4,099 for two adults. The national trike guide matches 23 trikes to state law.
Is San Jose bike friendly?
By the City's own layers: 565.6 measured miles of bikeway, 146.3 miles of open trail, a mile-weighted pavement score of 72.7 with 13.6% of scored miles Poor, and 1,638 bicycle-involved crashes in five years, four in five of them at intersections. Read your own row for the density, the crash rate and the pavement.
Is downtown San Jose safe to bike?
The City's crash file records where bicycles are hit; it says nothing about who lives there. Downtown and SOFA carries the highest bicycle-crash rate per square mile (46.1 a year) and 95113 the highest registered-theft rate (13.6 per 10,000 residents a year), because downtown is where bicycles are ridden and parked in public all day. The collision and theft sections give the numbers.
Can electric bikes be stolen, and how do I prevent it in San Jose?
Yes; 1,405 bikes registered as stolen inside San Jose's ZIPs sit in one voluntary registry. The City requires every unattended bicycle to be securely locked (§ 11.72.100). Register the serial the day the box opens, bring the battery indoors where the maker says it comes off (seven machines here), and in a highest-quarter ZIP treat the indoor area as your list.
Can you take an e-bike on VTA light rail, Caltrain or BART?
VTA allows six bicycles per light-rail car and its rule names "sealed dry or gel cell electric assisted bicycles" without mentioning lithium; confirm with VTA. Caltrain allows bikes aboard. BART allows folded bikes in every car at all times and unfolded bikes in all but the first or a crowded car. None of the three mentions tricycles.
Is there an e-bike rebate in San Jose?
The state's $2,000 voucher project concluded in December 2025. The Air District's Clean Cars for All is open and offers $7,500 for mobility options including e-bikes, but only to a household under 300% of the federal poverty level that scraps a 2007-or-older car. Silicon Valley Power is Santa Clara's own utility, and its rebates do not reach a San Jose address.
Where can I buy an electric bike in San Jose?
Every pick here ships free to a San Jose address. If you want to sit on one first, the San Jose shop directory lists seven verified stores.
What is the best electric bike for commuting with hills in San Jose?
The Kunlun (14.7 mph up 8% at 130 lb, 68 lb, folds) or the FLASH LITE 2.0 (13.6 mph, 440 lb ceiling) for the hilly 23 and steep 14; the TIGER RL matches both on the hill for riders up to 5'9". On the flat 237, the FLASH LITE ST or the META275 1.0.
Before you buy: seven checks
Seven checks, each answerable from this page, before the order goes in.
- ☐ Find your neighborhood's row in the table and read its 90th-percentile grade. Under 3.5%: the hill does not decide.
- ☐ If you have not ridden a bicycle in the last year, read only the three-wheel area.
- ☐ Total your weight and your load, then check the sum against the maker's ceiling on the height table.
- ☐ Check the maker's rider-height range contains you; the Silverado HD publishes none.
- ☐ Decide where the machine sleeps. Up a flight: 70 lb or under. Outside in a highest-quarter ZIP: a pack the maker says comes off.
- ☐ Under 16 in the household: class 2 or lower only, and a helmet under 18.
- ☐ Register the serial the day the box opens, and fit the § 21201(d) lights before the clocks go back.
The bottom line
Most of San Jose is flat, so most of San Jose buys on fit and storage: the FLASH LITE ST at $1,899 fits the most riders and the META275 1.0 at $1,399 is the value for a rider it fits. The foothills buy 750 W: the Kunlun for the climb and the fold, the FLASH LITE 2.0 for the climb with a load.
The creek trails buy the Defender at 66 lb, the train buys the META20 at 63.4 lb, the school run buys the MAX-CARGO, and a rider who has not been on a bicycle in years buys the Hera and takes the first rides in an empty lot. Every one of those sentences is a row of the matrix, and the matrix is a file you can read.
The machine that clears the most San Jose situations. Free shipping in the lower 48, US warranty support, Shop Pay installments at checkout.
Get the FLASH LITE ST — $1,899Limitations
What this page could not settle, numbered, with the reason for each.
- Two machines carry no computed climb. DWMEIGI publishes no bike weight for the MG1703 or the MG2301 Silverado HD in its product record, rendered page, FAQ, nine blog posts, three manuals (read as text and by OCR), two archived captures or our own listing. They appear in the matrix as unconfirmed on that row, never as a fit or a failure. The MG708 Hera's 88 lb comes from the maker's blog specification block.
- One machine carries no height fit. The MG2301 publishes no rider-height range anywhere we read; no fit claim rests on it.
- Twenty-four further machines that clear § 312.5(a), 21 Addmotor and 3 Eunorau, are not on this page because a maker-published bike weight had not been confirmed for them when the slate was drawn; Addmotor's specification table renders by script and was not read, and several of those pages carry the weight in their question-and-answer prose. The slate can grow when those figures are read.
- Owner feedback is uneven. Thirteen of seventeen machines had readable owner reviews on the makers' pages or independent video reviews; the Kunlun, the Foldtan (one review), the M-380 (six) and the MG2301 (none returned) did not. Reddit could not be read on either route we tried, and BBB and Trustpilot were not read. Where a maker's review widget groups counts across models (FLASH LITE ST and 2.0; URUS and ONE-TRIKE), no per-model count is printed.
- The theft figures are a voluntary registry, recorded to the ZIP, divided by a Census ZCTA population that is not the City's ZIP polygon, over a 5.7-year window, and apportioned to neighborhoods by land share on an assumption of uniformity nobody has measured. 95192 and 95141 carry no rate.
- 463 blocks have their pitch withheld (bridges and tunnels, walls and stairs, dips), and the road-surface map used to find structures has zero overlap with 6.5% of graded blocks, so some structure blocks may have survived; their end-to-end grades stay in the statistics.
- The fitness figures are twenty men, mean age 39, at a maximal sustainable effort, halved by this page's own choice; the sample's "untrained" group still played sport weekly.
- Four machines carry a class setting the rider can change, in the makers' words: two labelled class 2 and two labelled class 3, all shipped with a throttle and assistance stopping at 20 mph. Every speed here is computed at that cap. The class 3 label sits on two machines whose throttle and cutoff fit § 312.5(a)'s class 2 limb; the conflict is published in the class section, and the page follows the label, which is what § 312.5(c) puts on the frame.
- The motor-alone flat speeds are capped: the physics would put the reference machine at 25 to 26 mph on the flat; the controller stops assistance at 20 mph.
- VTA's battery-chemistry sentence is unresolved on the agency's own page for lithium packs; the page quotes it and does not resolve it.
- Two neighborhood names sit on two polygons each (Commercial, Guadalupe) and are pooled; the tables carry 295 rows for 297 polygons. Rows sum to 1,054,829 residents because 25 polygons overhang the city line; 978,216 residents' block groups sit inside it.
- The City's crash file counts a bicycle three ways (1,571 / 1,335 / 1,611); the union of 1,638 is used and the spread published. 20 of those crashes fall outside every polygon.
- No range is computed for any machine; the watt-hours are the makers' voltage and amp-hours multiplied, and the range sentences are the makers' own.
- The 8 mph climb floor and the 50 lb and 70 lb carry lines are editorial thresholds, stated as such wherever they appear.
- The injury record by age group was read and is held here; it sits beside no pick. Hertach 2018 reports a higher injury risk for older riders and no effect of age on crash risk (doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.021); Boele-Vos 2017 finds cyclists aged 75 and over fall from a bicycle more often than younger riders (doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.016); the CPSC's April 2026 report puts the 65-and-over share of e-bike injuries at 10%, "disproportionately high compared to other micromobility product types", with 75 of the 92 micromobility deaths in that age group from 2017 through 2024 involving an e-bike (pp. 11, 15); DiMaggio 2020 analyses the same US product data (doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043418). None is a study of tricycles, and the page's step from a balance finding to a third wheel is its own.
- One association name is printed with a corrected spelling; the City's layer spells ARVAC's name "Commitee".
When this page goes out of date
Any one of the events below makes a figure on this page stale, and the page is re-read when it happens.
- California amends § 312.5, § 21212.5, § 21213 or § 24016.
- San Jose adds electric-bicycle vocabulary to its code, changes § 11.04.031's designated area or § 13.44.100's 15 mph default, or posts a different trail limit.
- A maker republishes a weight, a payload ceiling or a rider-height range for any of the seventeen.
- A pick changes price or leaves stock; prices and cart links are read from our store on the date above.
- VTA, Caltrain or BART changes a bicycle rule, or VTA states a lithium rule.
- The Air District closes Clean Cars for All, or a new state e-bike program opens.
- USGS publishes a newer lidar collection for Santa Clara County, or the City republishes its neighborhood, street, crash, bikeway, trail or pavement layers.
How we verified this
Every grade was computed on USGS 3DEP 1-meter bare-earth lidar (project CA_SantaClaraCounty_2020_A20, sixteen tiles chosen from the street data) along the City of San Jose's own street centerlines, validated against eight USGS published elevations to a worst disagreement of 0.24 m, and every pitch was screened against the OpenStreetMap road-surface map, a five-meter step test and a dip test before a street was named.
Every neighborhood, crash, bikeway, trail, pavement and ZIP figure is the City's own layer, retrieved on September 16 and 19, 2026, and measured from its geometry. Every machine figure is the maker's own, read from its product record, rendered page, manuals and blog on September 16 and 19, and recomputed; the physics is stated in full above with its cited inputs.
Every statute was read back in full at its publisher, and the seventeen Vehicle Code sections were diffed word for word against an independent retrieval eight days earlier. Owner feedback was read for every machine on the routes named in Limitations. Every figure on this page was verified against a saved file, and the files are named in the references.
The photographs on this page are generated with Playcut (Nano Banana Pro at 2K) from prompts grounded in the City's own trail and bikeway layers and in this page's measured block file, and the cover type is set in real fonts, with the model rendering none of it.
The commuter in the Area 1 photograph is Maya Torres, a member of Redtail's fictional cast, generated with Playcut's custom-actor pipeline. The bicycles and tricycles in the photographs are unbranded stand-ins for the ride each area describes; every figure about a model comes from the maker's page and none from a picture.
Source register
Every source this page rests on, graded by tier; nothing below tier 4 is cited as fact.
| Tier | What it means here | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | Statute, regulation, court or agency primary text | Vehicle Code §§ 231, 312.5, 21201, 21204, 21206, 21207.5, 21212, 21212.5, 21213, 24016; San Jose Municipal Code; 66 FR 3388 |
| T2 | Government data and published measurements | USGS 3DEP lidar and EPQS; City of San Jose open-data layers; Census gazetteer and ACS; NOAA normals and daily summaries; CPSC micromobility report |
| T3 | Peer-reviewed research | Chorley 2020; Meijaard 2007; Kooijman 2011; Twisk 2017; Schepers 2014; Hertach 2018; Boele-Vos 2017; DiMaggio 2020; SWOV reports and fact sheets |
| T4 | Publisher's own statements (makers, transit agencies, incentive programs, registries) | maker product pages, records, manuals and blogs; VTA, Caltrain, BART; CARB and BAAQMD program pages; Bike Index |
| T5 | Aggregators, forums, AI summaries | not cited |
References
Every document cited above, numbered in the order the page first uses it, each linked to the deepest location its publisher addresses.
Statute and municipal code
- California Vehicle Code § 312.5 — leginfo.legislature.ca.gov (read September 16 and 19, 2026)
- Vehicle Code § 231 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 24016 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21201 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21204 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21206 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21207.5 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21212 — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21212.5 (AB 965, Stats. 2025, ch. 65, effective January 1, 2026) — leginfo
- Vehicle Code § 21213 — leginfo
- San Jose Municipal Code §§ 11.04.021, 11.04.031, 11.72.080, 11.72.100, 11.72.190, 11.72.200, 13.44.100 — Code of Ordinances, Municode (supplement of June 16, 2026; swept September 16, 2026)
- NHTSA, Consumer Information Regulations; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Rollover Resistance, 66 FR 3388 (January 12, 2001) — federalregister.gov
Measurement and public data
- USGS 3D Elevation Program, CA_SantaClaraCounty_2020_A20, 1 m bare-earth DEM — USGS 3DEP; point checks via the USGS Elevation Point Query Service
- City of San Jose Open Data: Neighborhoods (layer 549), Public and Private Streets, Crash Locations Last Five Years, Bikeways, Trails, Pavement Condition, Demographics by Census Block Group, Zip Code Boundary — data.sanjoseca.gov (retrieved September 16 and 19, 2026)
- U.S. Census Bureau, 2025 Gazetteer Files (places, California) and ACS 2023 5-year tables B01001 and B01003 — census.gov
- NOAA NCEI, U.S. Climate Normals 1991–2020 and Daily Summaries, station USW00023293 — ncei.noaa.gov
- U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Micromobility Products-Related Deaths, Injuries, and Hazard Patterns: 2017–2024 (April 2026) — cpsc.gov
- Bike Index, stolen-bike registry, search within 10 miles of San Jose, CA — bikeindex.org (retrieved September 16, 2026)
- OpenStreetMap contributors, drivable ways and bridge/tunnel/steps tags, San Jose, via Overpass — openstreetmap.org
Scholarship and manufacturer specifications
- Chorley A, Bott RP, Marwood S, Lamb KL. Physiological and anthropometric determinants of critical power, W′ and the reconstitution of W′ in trained and untrained male cyclists. Eur J Appl Physiol 2020;120:2349–2359 — doi:10.1007/s00421-020-04459-6
- Meijaard JP, Papadopoulos JM, Ruina A, Schwab AL. Linearized dynamics equations for the balance and steer of a bicycle: a benchmark and review. Proc R Soc A 2007;463:1955–1982 — doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1857
- Kooijman JDG, Meijaard JP, Papadopoulos JM, Ruina A, Schwab AL. A bicycle can be self-stable without gyroscopic or caster effects. Science 2011;332:339–342 — doi:10.1126/science.1201959
- Twisk D, Platteel S, Lovegrove G. An experiment on rider stability while mounting: comparing middle-aged and elderly cyclists on pedelecs and conventional bicycles. Accid Anal Prev 2017;105:109–116 — doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.004
- Schepers JP, Fishman E, den Hertog P, Klein Wolt K, Schwab AL. The safety of electrically assisted bicycles compared to classic bicycles. Accid Anal Prev 2014;73:174–180 — doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.010
- Hertach P, Uhr A, Niemann S, Cavegn M. Characteristics of single-vehicle crashes with e-bikes in Switzerland. Accid Anal Prev 2018;117:232–238 — doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.021
- Boele-Vos MJ et al. Crashes involving cyclists aged 50 and over in the Netherlands: an in-depth study. Accid Anal Prev 2017;105:4–10 — doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.016
- DiMaggio CJ et al. Injuries associated with electric-powered bikes and scooters: analysis of US consumer product data. Inj Prev 2020;26:524–528 — doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043418
-
SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. Naar meer veiligheid voor oudere fietsers, R-2020-22 (2020) — swov.nl/nl/publicatie; fact sheet Pedelecs and speed pedelecs (updated May 16, 2022) — swov.nl/en
-
Eunorau: FLASH LITE ST, FLASH LITE 2.0, META275 1.0, META20, Defender, URUS 2.0, MAX-CARGO 2.0, ONE-TRIKE 2.0, EKIDS20, EKIDS24 product pages and records — eunorau-ebike.com (read September 16 and 19, 2026)
- Qiolor: TIGER RL product page — qiolor.com (read September 16 and 19, 2026)
- Addmotor: Kunlun, Foldtan M-160, M-380 product pages — addmotor.com (read September 16 and 19, 2026)
- DWMEIGI: MG708 Hera, MG1703, MG2301 Silverado HD product pages, records, manuals and blog — dwmeigi.com (read September 19, 2026)
- VTA, Bikes on VTA — vta.org/go/bike; Caltrain, Bicycles — caltrain.com; BART, Bike Rules — bart.gov (read September 16, 2026)
- California Air Resources Board, California E-Bike Incentive Project — ww2.arb.ca.gov; Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Clean Cars for All and its FAQ — baaqmd.gov (read September 19, 2026); Silicon Valley Power (City of Santa Clara), home page, Wayback capture of January 1, 2026 — siliconvalleypower.com; San José Clean Energy, About — sanjosecleanenergy.org (read September 21, 2026)
- Redtail eBikes, store product reads via the Shopify Admin API (prices, stock, variants, cart permalinks), September 19, 2026 — redtailebikes.com
Read next
- California e-bike laws, all 483 cities checked
- Electric trikes in the USA: 23 matched to your ride, your body and your state
- Electric bikes for seniors
- Electric bikes for heavy adults
- eBike shops in San Jose: 7 verified stores
- Best electric bike San Francisco: 117 neighborhoods
- Best e-bikes for Los Angeles: all 114 neighborhoods
- The electric bike buying guide
Image credit: cover plate and scene photography generated with Playcut and composited in-house; Maya Torres, Redtail's cast commuter, is generated with Playcut's custom-actor pipeline for face consistency.





Share:
Delaware Electric Bike Laws 2026: 20 MPH Moped Line
Best Electric Bike Columbus: All 41 Communities